Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,722 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Gujarat High Court · 21 Jul 2014
    The manufacturing activity was earlier carried was given on lease and the assessee earned the rental income from the house property and assessee had claimed the benefit under Section 24 with respect to the rental income

    PHELIX APPLIANCES LTD. Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARR-4(2)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3700 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 24, 70, 71, 143(2)

  2. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 30 Jul 2014
    Whether the estimation of 8% gross profits prescribed u/s 44AD is based on some cogent material and evidences.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-XIII Vs. LOVISH OBEROI

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3699 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 44AD, 144

  3. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 22 Jul 2014
    Whether the assessee would qualify for deduction u/s 80IB(10), even when it has not completed the project within stipulated time.

    CHHAYA VALMIK NIKHADE Vs. THE ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3698 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections 80IB(10), 143(3), 147, 148

  4. Direct Tax ·Karnataka High Court · 14 Jul 2014
    Whether the claim of depreciation can be disallowed, when there are concurrent findings of the lower authorities that the assessee has established its claim.

    M/s WIPRO FINANCE LTD. Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3697 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Income Tax - Section 260A

  5. Direct Tax ·Gujarat High Court · 25 Jul 2014
    Whether the ex-parte order passed by the Tribunal can be allowed to stand, when no malafide intention can be attributed to the assessee for its absence during the hearing.

    VISION CORPORATION LTD. Vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3696 (HC-GUJARAT)

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 04 Jul 2014
    Whether a comparable with abnormal profit margin has to be excluded for the purpose of computing ALP

    ACIT. Vs. M/s BRIGAE CORPORATION INDIA PVT LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3695 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Income Tax - Sections 10A, 10B, 92CA, 143(3), 250

  7. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 09 Aug 2014
    S. 153A: No addition can be made in respect of an unabated assessment which has become final if no incriminating material is found during the search

    CIT. vs. Murli Agro Products Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3694 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 153A

  8. Direct Tax ·Karnataka High Court · 11 Aug 2014
    S. 80-IB: If the undertaking satisfies the conditions for eligibility in the initial year, it must get deduction for 10 years & non-compliance in a subsequent year is irrelevant

    Ace Multi Axes Systems Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3693 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Section. 80-IB

  9. Direct Tax ·ITAT Agra · 11 Aug 2014
    S. 57(iii): Interest paid on a loan taken to avoid premature encashment of a fixed deposit is deductible against the interest earned on the fixed deposit

    Raj Kumari Agarwal vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3692 (ITAT-AGRA) · Section. 57(iii)

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Ahmedabad · 05 Aug 2014
    It was not open to the A.O to decide the objection to notice u/s/ 148 by a composite assessment order

    M/s. Bharuch Enviro Infrastructure Ltd. Vs. The Dy. Comm. Of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3691 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · 147

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 31 Jul 2014
    Whether administrative and managerial expenses incurred for making investment could be disallowed u/s 14A, on which no dividend income was earned

    M/s DOUBLEDOT FINANCE LTD. Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3690 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income tax - Section 14A

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 30 May 2014
    Whether residential units exceeding the prescribed limit of 1500 sq.ft u/s 80IB(10) were eligible for benefits of exemption under such section

    G K DEVELOPERS Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3689 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income Tax - Sections 80IB(10), 80IB(14)(a), 143(3), 263

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 30 May 2014
    Whether the AO's entertainment of application of the assessee u/s 154 for interest on refund was within its jurisdiction and all subsequent proceeding, emanating from it is was justified.

    ALPS INDUSTRIES LTD. Vs. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3688 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 154, 244 244A, 244A(1), 263, 264

  14. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 08 Aug 2014
    Whether when it is established that the payments made to the non-resident were FTS, the same was tax-exempt as per proviso to Sec 9(1)(vii) as the agreements entered into were dated prior to April 1, 1976 - YES: Bombay HC

    CIT. Vs. M/s MONTEDISON OF ITALY

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3687 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income tax - Sections 9(1)(vi) & (vii)

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 08 Aug 2014
    Whether when such investments are from internal accruals, even then some TP adjustment with respect to interest is required to be made.

    M/s PRITHVI INFORMATION SOLUTIONS LTD. Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3686 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 2(24)(x), 10A, 14A, 36(1)(va), 40(a), 43B, 115JB, 133(6), 143(3), 144C, 194C, 194I, 200

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 08 Aug 2014
    The AO allowed a deduction 5% of the total receipts under sec. 44C. Accordingly, the AO determined the total income of the assessee at Rs.21,54,31,390/-.

    ITO. Vs. LINKLATERS AND PAINES

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3685 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 44C, 234B

  17. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 08 Aug 2014
    Whether when the Revenue has not examined various terms used in the relevant tax treaty as per various judicial decisions given with respect to the same tax treaty, no wrong will be committed if the Tribunal remands the case back to the AO.

    ACNIELSEN CORPORATION Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3684 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Section 9(1)(vi)

  18. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 01 Aug 2014
    Whether a part of franchise fee can also be treated as capital expenditure.

    CIT. Vs. JUBILANT FOODWORK PVT LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3683 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Section 37

  19. Direct Tax ·Karnataka High Court · 09 Aug 2014
    S. 153A: AO is required to assess the “total income” and is not confined only to income which was unearthed during search. Law laid down in All Cargo Global Logistics disapproved

    Canara Housing Development Co vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3682 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Section 153A

  20. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 09 Aug 2014
    S. 23(1)(a): Entire law on determination of “annual value” explained

    CIT vs. Tip Top Typography

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3681 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 23(1)(a)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.