Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,722 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Allahabad High Court · 06 Aug 2014
    HC prohibits Non advocates from appearing before VAT Authorities

    Tax Lawyers Association Lko. Throu General Secy. & Anr. Vs. State Of U.P.Thru. Prin. Secy. Tax & Registration U.P. Lko. & Ors

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3680 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  2. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 31 Jul 2014
    The discretionary and equitable jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is, therefore, not available to question the order passed.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3679 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Section 154(1A)

  3. Direct Tax ·AP High Court · 02 Jul 2014
    Whether when the assessee has paid advance tax in certain financial years but chooses not to file returns for many years, the income of the years for which no returns were filed, partakes the character of undisclosed income

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AP-II Vs. MR VIMAL CHAND JAIN

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3678 (HC-AP)

  4. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 01 Aug 2014
    Whether the disallowance under rule 6D should be computed with reference to the total travel expenditure incurred by an employee or other persons during the entire year and not with reference to the expenditure incurred during each trip separately.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/s MAFATLAL DYES AND CHEMICALS LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3677 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections 37(3), 40A(8), 256(1)

  5. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 09 Jul 2014
    Whether the mere fact that it may finally be concluded that the appeal is not maintainable, would not prior to such a finding, lead to a conclusion that no appeal was pending.

    AVANTIKA PRARAP SINH MORARJI Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3676 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Section - 95(i)(c)

  6. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 16 Jul 2014
    Whether reopening of assessment is based on mere change of opinion where a query had been raised with regard to a particular issue and the Assessing Officer had duly applied his mind to the queries raised and taken a view on the matter.

    ARONI COMMERCIALS LTD. Vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3675 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax – Sections 143(3), 147, 148

  7. Direct Tax ·AP High Court · 01 Jul 2014
    Whether in case, no TDS was deducted on the same, the employee can be held responsible for the same.

    SRI V VENKAT REDDY AND OTHERS Vs. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3674 (HC-AP) · Income Tax - Section 10(10C)

  8. Direct Tax ·Madras High Court · 14 Jul 2014
    Whether in case bonds were not available till the last date for investment, capital gain exemption u/s 54EC can be granted to the assessee beyond the period of 6 months.

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. AKBAR ALI DHALA

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3673 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax - Section 54EC

  9. Direct Tax ·Kerala High Court · 09 Jul 2014
    Whether penalty proceedings concluded beyond three years from the date of detection of the offence is sustainable and where no extension was granted by the Deputy Commissioner.

    BALASO KAKASO NIKAM ALIAS BALU SAIT Vs. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF INCOME TAX (INV)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3672 (HC-KERALA) · Income tax - Section 67

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 18 Jul 2014
    ITAT - Once DRP confirm’ s TPO’s action, Revenue cannot appeal against DRP order

    DCIT vs. Rolls Royce Marine India Pvt. Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3671 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 144C

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 07 Aug 2014
    Whether payment made in respect to franchise fees is capital in nature, when no transfer of ownership with respect to the process and the know-how under the agreement has taken place in favour of the assessee.

    ACIT. Vs. JUBILANT FOODWORKS LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3670 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 143(3), 154, 254

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 08 Aug 2014
    Whether when the AO himself accepted that income of only the assessee is to be assessed in his hands and not the income of family members, a different view can still be taken in the second assessment order in the absence any material evidence

    RAM KUMAR Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3669 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 132, 143(2), 158BC, 1558BFA

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 08 Aug 2014
    Whether when the AO himself accepted that income of only the assessee is to be assessed in his hands and not the income of family members, a different view can still be taken in the second assessment order in the absence any material evidence

    RAM KUMAR Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3668 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 132, 143(2), 158BC, 1558BFA

  14. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 14 Jul 2014
    Whether the legislature by introducing Ss 153A to 153C has given a go-by to the dual assessment systems of block assessment and normal assessment

    FILATEX INDIA LTD. Vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3667 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 115JB, 153A, 158BA(2), 260A

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 08 Aug 2014
    Non-existence of written agreement cannot be sole base for disallowance of commission

    M/s. India Fashions Ltd. vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3666 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 14A, 41(1) & 195

  16. Direct Tax ·Rajasthan High Court · 06 Aug 2014
    Statutory body like the ITAT is expected to show consistency. Change in constitution of Bench does not mean diametrically opposite views can be taken by the Members

    M/s Unique Artage vs. UOI

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3665 (HC-RAJASTHAN)

  17. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 06 Aug 2014
    No S. 271(1)(c) penalty for failure to compute capital gains as per s. 50C. Direct judgements on the topic have to be followed

    Harish Voovaya Shetty vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3664 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 271(1)(c), 50C

  18. Direct Tax ·Kerala High Court · 10 Jun 2014
    Whether while exercising powers u/s 226, the Income-tax Officer should not act as a mere tax gatherer but as a quasi-judicial authority vested with the power of mitigating hardships to the assessee.

    MOTHER INDIA EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL CHARITABLE TRUST Vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-III, THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE BRANCH MANAGER FEDERAL BANK LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3663 (HC-KERALA) · Income Tax - Sections 220, 226

  19. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 16 Jul 2014
    Whether securities retained by a nationalized bank to maintain the Statutory Liquidity ratio as prescribed by the RBI guidelines, shall be treated as stock in trade.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX –V Vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3662 (HC-DELHI)

  20. Direct Tax ·Gujarat High Court · 21 Jul 2014
    Whether in case commission expenditure incurred by the assessee was not having color of business expenditure but was incurred as a measure of diversion of income and legitimate tax liabilities, disallowance u/s 40A can be warranted.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SANDIP KIRITBHAI PATEL

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3661 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 40A(2)(b), 143(2)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.