-
Whether the assessee is eligible for deduction u/s 80IC if it is engaged in the manufacture of a product
CIT. Vs. PAWAN AGRAWAL
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4108 (HC-HP) · Income Tax - Section 80IC
-
Whether netting up of profits from all the overseas project is mandated for ascertaining quantum of deduction u/s 80HHB
CIT. Vs. HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LTD.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4107 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income tax - Section 80HHB
-
Whether in case, the building which is leased out by the assessee is nothing else but a building simplicitor and is not a building, which is equipped with specialized plant and machinery, the same can be treated as a 'plant'.
HOTEL ARTI DELUX PVT LTD. Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4106 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 14, 22, 260A
-
Whether when there is common shareholder for two companies, certain payments made towards deputation costs by one company to another can necessarily be construed as a colourable device
DYNATRON SERVICES PVT LTD. Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4105 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax – Sections 127(2), 132, 142(1), 143(2), 153A
-
Whether when the assessee incures certain expenditure in the run up to the commencement of income such expenditures are to be treated as revenue in nature
JCDECAUX ADVERTISING INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4104 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 3, 4
-
Whether when an exporter on ground of receiving advance payment allows discount to a non-resident buyer without having any contractual obligation for the same, he is liable for tax deduction at source u/s 195 on amount of discount allowed on such sales
DCIT. Vs. M/s KOTHARI FOOD AND FRAGRANCES
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4103 (ITAT-LUCKNOW) · Income tax - Sections 40(a)(i), 194 C, 194 H, 195
-
SC - Proviso to Sec. 113 to operate prospectively; proviso cannot be treated as declaratory/statutory or curative in nature
CIT vs Vatika Township Private Limited
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4102 (SC)
-
AOP not formed by volition of the parties, Income from compulsory acquisition not business income
CIT Vs GOVINDBHAI MAMAIYA
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4101 (SC)
-
S. 253: Filing appeals in disregard & wilful disobedience to the law laid down constitutes gross abuse of power and deserves to be punished for contempt of court and by award of exemplary costs. Action not pursued in view of written apology of concerned officials
ACIT vs. M/s. Veena Developers
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4100 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 253
-
S. 263: TPO’s acceptance of ALP shows two views are possible & CIT has no jurisdiction to revise assessment
CIT vs. SAP Labs Pvt. Ltd
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4099 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Section 263
-
AO’s action of giving effect to a quashed s. 263 revision order termed “assault on rule of law” & “contempt of court”
DCIT vs. SAP Labs India Pvt. Ltd
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4098 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
-
S. 254(1): Unnecessary remand by the ITAT causes prejudice and amounts to a failure to exercise jurisdiction
Coca-Cola India Private Limited vs. ITAT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4097 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 254(1)
-
ITAT – Disallowance of business expenditure not a ground for reassessment beyond period of four years
ITO Vs ESBEE HOLDINGS PVT. LTD
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4096 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
ITAT – Long term capital loss resulting from adjustment of advances not a sham transaction
CONSOLIDATED FINVEST & HOLDINGS LTD Vs ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4095 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
S. 143(2)(ii): Fact that case is selected for scrutiny under CASS does not mean s. 143(2) notice & assessment order are void for non-application of mind by AO
U.P. State Industrial Development Corp (UPSIDC) vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4094 (ITAT-LUCKNOW) · Section 143(2)(ii)
-
S. 145: Even if assessee is following mercantile system, income cannot be assessed, on “real income” vs. “hypothetical income” theory, if its collection/ receipt is not certain
Maruti Securities Ltd vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4093 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 145
-
S. 68: Purchases cannot be treated as “bogus” only on the ground that the suppliers are not traceable
CIT vs. Nangalia Fabrics Pvt. Ltd
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4092 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section 68
-
Deduction U/s. 80-IB(10) available on additional income offered u/s 132(4) in return filed u/s 153A
Malpani Estates Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4091 (ITAT-PUNE) · Sections. 80-IB(10), 132(4), 153A
-
For f indexation, date should be reckoned from the date from which the original owner held the property
ITO. Vs. Mrs. Bibi Siddiqua Husaini
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4090 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Can High Court Interfere with discretion of Settlement Commission?
M/s. Vinay Wire & Poly Product Pvt. Ltd. And Anr Vs. Director General Of Central Excise And 2 Ors.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4089 (HC-ALLAHABAD)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.