Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,722 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 15 Sep 2014
    Whether depreciation is allowable with respect to the block of assets and not the individual assets

    ACIT. Vs. SOUTH ASIA TYRES LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4148 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income Tax - Sections 2(11), 32, 43, 143(3)

  2. Direct Tax ·AP High Court · 22 Sep 2014
    HC – Conditions for allowability of Secret Commission

    CIT vs M/s.Transport Corporation of India

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4147 (HC-AP)

  3. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 04 Sep 2014
    Whether when no part of the work was undertaken outside Singapore which was to be carried out on a turnkey basis, the appellant ONGC's claim for deduction of taxes is legally sustainable when no taxes were payable as per the provisions of the Indian Income Tax Act

    ONGC LTD. Vs WESTERN GECO INTERNATIONAL LTD

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4146 (SC)

  4. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 30 Jun 2014
    Whereas, the assessee claimed that the said amount was not taxable in the hands of the assessee company in India as the marketing services for which the said amount was given did not make available (technical knowledge, skill, know-how etc.) within the meaning of the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and the USA.

    KANBAY INCORPORATED. Vs. DDIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4145 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income Tax - Sections 5(2), 9, 143(3), 144C(13)

  5. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 30 Jun 2014
    Whether AO could refer a matter of international transaction to the TPO without arriving at a conclusion of objective necessity for referring such matter u/s 92CA(1)

    NIHILENT TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4144 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income tax - Sections 92C, 92CA

  6. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 14 Aug 2014
    Whether even if the transaction had been structured in the manner as suggested by the Revenue, the gains arising to the shareholders of Copal-Jersey from sale of their shares in Copal-Jersey to Moody UK would not be taxable under Section 9(1)(i), as their value could not be stated to be derived substantially from assets in India

    DIT. Vs. COPAL RESEARCH LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4143 (HC-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 9(1)(i), 90(2), 115JB, 195, 201A, 245N, 245R

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 29 Aug 2014
    Whether when the assessee has failed to furnish complete data relating to allocation of costs between the AEs, no benchmarking of international transactions can be done in such circumstances

    CONTITECH INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4142 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 10(34), 14A, 92CA(3), 143(3), 144C

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 28 Aug 2014
    Whether when the assessee has inadvertently included any company in the list of comparables, the same can be made a reason to bar the assessee from claiming that it was wrongly included

    UNITED HEALTH GROUP INFORMATION SERVICES PVT LTD. Vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4141 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax – Sections 143(3), 144C

  9. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 22 Aug 2014
    Whether companies involved in the business of investment, merchant banking and corporate finance can be compared to a company engaged in the business of investment advisory activities

    CARLYLE INDIA ADVISORS PVT LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4140 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 92C(1), (2), 143(3), 144C

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 28 Aug 2014
    Whether when selling expenses incurred by assessee has not led to brand promotion of such product sold by it, can it be brought within the purview of AMP expenses for determining the cost of the international transactions

    SHARP BUSINESS SYSTEMS INDIA LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4139 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 37(3A), (3B)

  11. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 21 Aug 2014
    Whether any TDS obligation arises on part of the bank when no capital gain liability arises out of investments made made by non-resident individual in government securities

    DIT. Vs. ICICI BANK LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4138 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income tax - Sections 90

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Jaipur · 28 Aug 2014
    Whether interference by the Tribunal is warrented in any case where the issue regarding deduction of TDS on remmittances made to a non-resident towards sales commission and advertisement charges, was already decided by the Coordinate Bench and the facts are same as of the present case

    ADIT. Vs. SUMIT GUPTA

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4137 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · Income tax - Sections 9(1)(vii)(b), 195, 201(1), 201(1A)

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 28 Aug 2014
    Whether any TDS liability u/s 195 arises, when the tax authorities have failed to show that the payment received by the non-resident party is liable to tax in India either in terms of Indian Income tax Act or in terms of Indo-US DTAA

    RICH GRAVISS PRODUCTS PVT LTD. Vs. ADDL. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4136 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 9(1)(vii), 37(1), 40(a)(i), 195

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 29 Aug 2014
    Whether the DR can be allowed to raise a new ground that receipt in question is FTS, although neither the AO nor the CIT(A) have considered the receipt in question as FTS

    SWIBER OFFSHORE MARINE PTE LTD. Vs. ADIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4135 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 44BB, 271B

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 03 Sep 2014
    Whether if any disallowance is wrranted the remedy lies with the CIT u/s 263

    PURNIMA DUTTA. Vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4134 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · Income Tax - Sections 40(a)(ia), 41(1), 143(3), 147, 148, 195, 263

  16. Direct Tax ·Madras High Court · 25 Aug 2014
    Whether services rendered by a non-resident agent for facilitating the export of assessee, can be treated as "fees for technical services"

    CIT. Vs. KIKANI EXPORTS PVT LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4133 (HC-MADRAS) · Income tax - Sections 9, 9(1)(i), 143(3), 195, 263

  17. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 27 Aug 2014
    Whether when the agreement was not entered into nor service was made nor payment was received in India, even then disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) can be made

    DCIT. Vs. EL FORGE LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4132 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Income tax - Sections 9, 40(a)(i), 195(2), 201

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 05 Sep 2014
    Whether when the non-resident assessee fails to furnish all the agreements relating to offshore equipment supply and supervisory contract, the AO cannot be expected to make an objective assessment

    SHANGHAI ELECTRIC GROUP COMPANY LTD. Vs. DDIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4131 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 28, 44BBB

  19. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 09 Sep 2014
    The case was selected for Scrutiny and the AO assessed income at Rs. 16,89,06,810/- under section 143(3) read with section 144C(1). Assessee filed objections before the DRP which dismissed the same.

    ENSCO MARITIME LTD. Vs. ADIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4130 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 44AB, 44BB(1), 142(1), 143(2), (3), 144C(13)

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 05 Sep 2014
    Whether the assessee will be eligible for deduction u/s 54EC, when investment made, in the relavant AY was not within six months from handing over of the possession to the developer by virtue of joint development agreement

    S R MADHAVAN (HUF). Vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4129 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax - Sections 54, 54EC, 148

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.