Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,722 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 20 Oct 2014
    Fraud in determination of LIBOR/ EURIBOR no reason to discard it as ALP

    Vijay Electricals Limited vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4288 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)

  2. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 20 Oct 2014
    Transfer Pricing: Turnover filter is an important criteria in choosing comparables

    Trilogy E-Business Software India vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4287 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  3. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 21 Oct 2014
    Grant given to safeguard the interests of depositors, though used for meeting SLR requirements of RBI relatable to its banking activity, is still capital in nature

    The Nanded District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4286 (ITAT-PUNE)

  4. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 24 Oct 2014
    S. 41(1): Unclaimed & unproven liabilities are deemed to have ceased and are assessable as income

    ITO. Vs. Sajjankumar Didwani

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4285 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 41(1)

  5. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 24 Oct 2014
    No S. 14A/ Rule 8D Disallowance if accounts not examined. Consent fee paid to SEBI is not penalty for infraction of law

    ITO. vs. Reliance Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4284 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 14A

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 28 Oct 2014
    S. 50C: AO cannot straightaway adopt stamp duty value as consideration for capital gains but must offer assessee benefit of reference to DVO for valuation

    ITO vs. Onkarmal Kajaria Family Trust

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4283 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · Section. 50C

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Cochin · 24 Oct 2014
    Charter hire payment is not assessable as royalty, there is no obligation to deduct TDS and no disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) can be made

    Mathewsons Exports & Imports vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4282 (ITAT-COCHIN) · Section. 40(a)(i)

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 24 Oct 2014
    S. 2(1A): Gains from sale of agricultural land is exempt even though purchaser intends to use the land for commercial purposes

    DCIT. vs. M. Kalyan Chakravarthy

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4281 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 2(1A)

  9. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 24 Oct 2014
    Various arguments on the applicability of s. 14A & Rule 8D where the AO has not recorded satisfaction, where the shares are held in strategic/ subsidiary companies, held as stock-in-trade, where there are surplus funds and the quantum of disallowance under Explanation (f) to s. 115JA/ 115JB considered

    HSBC Invest Direct (India) Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4280 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 14A, 115JA, 115JB

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 24 Oct 2014
    Transfer pricing principles on right of TPO to collect info u/s 133(6), exclusion of high profit comparables, adjustment for limited risk environment, exclusion of reimbursement costs for computing operation margins explained

    HSBC Electronic Data Processing India vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4279 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section. 133(6)

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 24 Oct 2014
    Law on the tests to distinguish whether gains on sale of shares is short-term or business profits explained

    Harsha L. Tahilramani vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4278 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  12. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 28 Oct 2014
    S. 2(24)(x) r.w.s 36(1)(va) & 43B: Even employees' contribution to PF etc is allowable if deposited before due date of filing ROI

    CIT. vs. Ghatge Patil Transports Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4277 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 2(24)(x)

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 28 Oct 2014
    Second proviso to s. 40(a)(ia) inserted w.e.f. 1.4.2013 should be treated as retrospectively applicable from 1.4.2005 and no disallowance for want of TDS can be made if payee has paid tax thereon. Assessee must be given opportunity to file Form 26A

    G. Shankar vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4276 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section. 40(a)(ia)

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 29 Oct 2014
    Foreign exchange fluctuation gain arising on realization of trade debtor’s, payment to creditors etc is operational income. Tests for distinguishing secondment contract with technical services agreement

    Cisco Systems Services B.E vs. ADIT (IT)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4275 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 29 Oct 2014
    “Umbrage” taken in Casio that BMW did not follow L. G. Electronics is based on “wrong head note”. L. G. does not deal with a case of distributor and so there is no conflict with the law laid down therein

    BMW India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4274 (ITAT-DELHI)

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 24 Oct 2014
    Rule 8D(ii) & 8D(iii) do not apply to shares held as stock-in-trade. Loss arising out of derivatives from the income arising out of buying and selling of shares

    DCIT. vs. Baljit Securities Private Limited

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4273 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  17. Direct Tax ·ITAT Jaipur · 24 Oct 2014
    Bogus purchases: Filing of confirmation of suppliers with PAN and TIN number are not sufficient to prove the purchases are genuine if they are not supported by other facts including delivery of goods & presence of suppliers

    Anuj Kumar Varshney

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4272 (ITAT-JAIPUR)

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 22 Oct 2014
    In view of the finding of the service-tax authorities that services were rendered, argument that amount paid is a reimbursement of actual cost without profit element is not acceptable and it is chargeable as “fee for included services”

    AMD Research & Development Center vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4271 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)

  19. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 16 Oct 2014
    S. 271(1)(c): Wrong claim for depreciation by showing a finance or loan transaction as a lease transaction attracts penalty

    Times Guaranty Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4270 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 271(1)(c)

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 14 Oct 2014
    TPO cannot question commercial expediency of payment to AE. RBI approval to a transaction implies it is at arms' length price

    DCIT. Vs. Owens Corning Industries (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4269 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.