Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,699 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 16 Apr 2015
    HC - Since software development centres added under each license were only extensions of the original undertaking, therefore they could not consequently be treated as separate undertakings. Sec 10A-benefit treating assessee’s 31 units as separate-undertakings is denied.

    HCL Technologies vs ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6188 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 10A

  2. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 16 Apr 2015
    SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had held that demerger scheme of Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd had bonafide commercial purpose

    Department of Income Tax vs. Vodafone Essar Gujarat Ltd & Anr.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6187 (SC)

  3. Direct Tax ·ITAT Ahmedabad · 19 Mar 2015
    ITAT - As per provisions of section 50C(2), the AO was not justified in adopting the value of the property as adopted by the “stamp valuation authority” without referring to the DVO for ascertaining the fair market value of the property.

    Nikunjkumar H. Jariwala vs ITO

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6186 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section. 50C(2)

  4. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Despite documentary evidence and broker’s confirmation, genuineness of penny stock transactions has to be determined on the basis of ‘preponderance of human probabilities’. If assessee is unable to explain ‘intriguing’ facts and circumstances, genuineness of transaction cannot be accepted

    ITO vs. Shamim M. Bharwani

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6185 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 68

  5. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Only credits received during the year can be assessed as unexplained cash credits. Credits of earlier years, even if unexplained, cannot be assessed

    Rita Stephen Pinto vs. ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6184 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 68

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - For penalty proceedings initiated on issues unrelated to assessment of income (such as for s. 269SS/ 269T & TDS defaults), time limit runs from date of initiation of penalty proceedings and not from date of CIT(A)'s order

    ITO vs. JKD Capital & Finlease Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6183 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 275(1)(a)

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - In a cross-objection, a new legal issue can be raised for the first time before the ITAT

    ITO vs. Jasjit Singh (ITAT Delhi)

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6182 (ITAT-DELHI)

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - S. 2(22)(e) is a deeming provision and has to be strictly construed. Assessee can discharge onus by pointing to 'preponderance of probability' and If explanation is not found to be false then, even if amounts are assessed as 'deemed dividend', penalty cannot be levied

    ITO vs. Dipti Nikhil Modi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6181 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 2(22)(e), 271(1)(c)

  9. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 16 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Amounts credited to Thyrocare Service Provider (collection centers for patient samples) by assessee (an accredited laboratory) is covered by provisions of Sec 194H.

    ITO vs. Thyrocare Technologies Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6165 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 194H

  10. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Legal consequence of applicability of proviso to Sec 2(15) on registration of an entity as charitable institution - Seeks Larger-bench reference

    Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6164 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 2(15), 12A

  11. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2015
    HC - Order of Tribunal granting set-off of business loss of AY 2002-03 against the profits of erstwhile 10A unit for AY 2005-06 is confirmed as losses/depreciation set-off arising from AY 2001-02 and subsequent years is allowed.

    CIT vs. Shantivijay Jewels Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6163 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 10A

  12. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 14 Apr 2015
    HC - Non-compete relatable to consideration for sale of division is taxable as business income u/s 28(va)

    Arun Toshniwal and Anr vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6161 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 28(va)

  13. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2015
    HC - Where assessee's claim for depreciation on intangible asset was based on incorrect valuation, notice under section 148 was valid.

    Powerdeal Energy Systems (I) (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 2, Nashik

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6160 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58502&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Cochin · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Loan advanced to other registered trusts from unutilised portion of income which exceeded more than 15 per cent, will not be held as application of income

    Income-tax Officer, Ward-1, Thiruvalla v. Believers Church India

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6158 (ITAT-COCHIN) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39133&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  15. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 15 Apr 2015
    HC - Where tenancy of rental premises belonged to individual partners and not to assessee-firm, Firm could not be assessed for transfer of tenancy rights.

    Commissioner of Income Tax-17 v. Bombay Electric Laundry

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6157 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59246&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 15 Apr 2015
    ITAT - A software product company cannot be regarded as a comparable to a company engaged in software development services.

    Invensys Development Centre India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Hyderabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6156 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=7908&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 24 Mar 2015
    HC - Calculation of Average Investment U/s 14A r.w rule 8D only Tax Free Investment to be Considered

    ABC India Ltd. Vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6155 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 14A

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 14 Apr 2015
    ITAT - CIT(A)’s order rejecting stay petition is appealable before ITAT u/s 253. CIT(A) is empowered to grant stay when appeal is pending disposal before him.

    Employees’ Provident Fund Organization vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6148 (ITAT-DELHI)

  19. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 13 Apr 2015
    HC - CBDT’s order rejecting assessee’s (an IT Park developer) application for issuance of notification u/s 80IA(4)(iii) for availing deduction is set aside since assessee had complied with all the conditions prescribed by the Scheme and also obtained certificate from competent authority.

    Techniplex vs. Central Board of Direct Taxes

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6147 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 80IA(4)(iii)

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 13 Apr 2015
    ITAT - Mistake in claiming deduction of interest expenditure despite s. 43B attracts penalty u/s 271(1)(c)

    Trans Polyurethane Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6146 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 271(1)(c)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.