-
ITAT - Transfer of 'Technical know-how" is distinct from ‘Goodwill’, therefore amount received for sale of ‘technical know-how’ upon transfer of ‘transportation business’ not capital gains for AY 1997-98 absent any cost of acquisition.
ABB Limited vs ACIT
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6802 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
-
ITAT (TM) - No exemption u/s 11 to assessee (an educational institution) for purchasing car in the name of trustee. In the event of Sec 13(1)(d) violation, only income/investment made in violation of Sec 11(5) shall be liable to tax.
Audyogik Shikshan Mandal vs. ITO
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6801 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 13(2)(b)
-
HC - No exemption u/s 10(23C) on failure of assessee to produce audited books of account
Bhupesh Kumar Sikshan Evam Vikas Sansthan v. Director General of Income-tax
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6800 (HC-PATNA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60989&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - If assessee-housing finance corporation had not charged any interest, pending litigation on recovery of housing loans, interest income could not be treated as income accrued or received to assessee.
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Parshwanath Housing Financing Corpn. Ltd.
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6799 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59315&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - Availability of alternate remedy under Act would not be a bar for Court to examine notice issued under section 148 if challenged on ground of no jurisdiction, violation of principles of natural justice, no authority of law and validity or vires of statutory provision being under challenge.
Dell India (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Bengaluru
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6798 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60973&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Where assessee did not have "ownership" but had "transferable tenancy rights" of flat giving possession, control and transferable right in flat, assessee was entitled for exemption u/s 54F.
Archana Parasrampuria v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-24 (1) (3), Mumbai
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6797 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40868&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Where assessee (an NRI) transferred to India his own fund, said fund could not represent his unexplained investment under section 69A.
Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-16 (1), Hyderabad v. Madhusudan Rao
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6796 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40065&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - Unless books of assessee is rejected on some legal or justified basis, no reference can be made to DVO to determine construction cost of factory
Commissioner of Income-tax-II, Amritsar v. Freedom Board & Paper Mills
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6795 (HC-P&H) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61015&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - If assessee is dealing with large volume of shares for which one has to devote considerable time and resources and has to carry out activities in a systematic manner, income from share transactions is taxable as business income.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 25(3), Mumbai v. Vinod K. Sharda
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6794 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40869&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - 'On-Money' received by a builder on sale of flats held as stock-in-trade is taxable only in the year of sale of the flats and not in the year of offer/ disclosure. Unless the title of the assessee was extinguished, the title of the purchaser could not arise. Both could not be the exclusive owners of the same property at the same time.
DCIT vs. Ohm Developers
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6793 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
ITAT - The transaction of allowing credit period to the AE on realisation of sale proceeds is not an independent transaction and has to be considered along with the main international transaction of sale of goods. Goldstar Jewellery Ltd and Kusum Healthcare Pvt. Ltd. followed
ACIT vs. Information Systems Resource Centre Pvt. Ltd
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6792 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
ITAT - As per section 43(5)(d), loss from trading in derivatives is not a speculation loss and can be set-off against normal business profits. R.B.K. Securities (P) Ltd. applied.
ITO vs. Emperor International Ltd
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6791 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 43(5)(d)
-
ITAT - Section 143(2) and 153C notices issued in the name of the non-existent amalgamating company are void and render the assessment order null and void
Computer Engineering Services India (P) Ltd vs. ACIT
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6790 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections 143(2), 153C
-
HC - Meaning of expressions "consultancy services" and "independent personal services" in the context of a DTAA explained
CIT vs. Grup ISM P. Ltd
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6789 (HC-DELHI) · Section 9
-
HC - Whilst the AO is certainly empowered to examine the nature of expenditure in the application of trust, he cannot go behind the certificate issued under Section 12A.
DIT Vs. Ram Kishan Kulwant Rai Charitable Trust
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6788 (HC-DELHI) · Section 12A
-
HC - Assessee did not debit the amount of Service Tax to the P&L as an expenditure nor did the assessee claim any deduction in respect of the amount and considering that the assessed is following the mercantile system of accounting, the question of disallowance u/s 43B would not arise.
Cit vs Noble And Hewitt (I) (P) Ltd.
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6787 (HC-DELHI) · Section 43B
-
ITAT - Reassessment’s made for the assessment years under consideration have become invalid for not having served the mandatory notice u/s 143(2) on the assessee.
ITO Vs. M/s Staunch Marketing Pvt. Ltd.
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6786 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections 143(2), 147
-
ITAT - No expenditure has been claimed by the assessee in its books of accounts. Under such circumstances the question of disallowance u/s 43B does not arise.
ITO vs. Nafe Singh Gahalawat
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6785 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 43B
-
HC - Registry not to accept any appeal where appeals is filed by Revenue with “underlined/marked” certified copies.
M/s. Goldstone Technologies Ltd., Vs Commissioner of Income Tax-II
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6784 (HC-AP)
-
ITAT - Assessee’s counsel (CA) liable for suitable proceedings under ICAI rules for his professional misconduct, misbehaviour, wasting the time of court and unlawfully attempting to interfere in the process of judicial dispensation. Cost also levied under Rule 32A of ITAT Rules.
M/s. Mundra Woolen Mills (P) Ltd. Vs The ACIT
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6783 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.