-
ITAT - Amount of payment of interest are hire purchases cannot be characterized as interest payable and provisions of Section 194A are not attracted in such transactions.
Pearl Drinks Ltd. Versus ITO, Ward-14 (2), New Delhi
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11071 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51222&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Not only profits but also losses from the business have to be taken into consideration while computing deduction u/s 10B .
DCIT-10 (3) (2), Mumbai Versus M/s Phoenix Mecano (I) Pvt. Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11070 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51223&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - Direction of special audit u/s 142(2A) for the assessment year where assessment is not pending or without issuing SCN is not valid.
TAKSHASHILA REALTIES PVT LTD Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND 2
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11069 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=66235&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - A private complaint without any further investigation by the authorities is not a tangible material to enable the AO to form a belief that income chargeable to tax had escaped assessment.
BIYANI IMPEX PRIVATE LIMITED Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11068 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=66236&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The assessee company had directly absorbed the profit derived from the sale of its capital asset in the balance sheet thereby avoided to disclose the same in its profit and loss account in order to escape from the clutches of the provisions of section 115JB.
M/s. PVP Corporate Parks Pvt. Ltd Versus The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-5 (2), Chennai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11067 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51209&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Not passing order u/s 201(1) before initiation of proceedings u/s 271C make imposition of penalty invalid.
INCOME TAX OFFICER, DELHI Versus M/s AIR LIQUIDE NORTH PVT. LTD.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11066 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50622&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The bank account is not books of account of the assessee, therefore, the Form 26AS cannot be made a basis for addition.
VIKASH YADAV Versus ITO, WARD-2, REWARI
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11065 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50628&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Failure of the assessee to comply with notice u/s 142(1) cannot be said to be a default which may justify the levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(b).
M/s. M.P. State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited Versus ACIT, 2 (1), Bhopal
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11064 (ITAT-INDORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51213&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Rental/licence fee received by the assessee in respect of the property given on lease is liable to be assessed as business income and not as income from house property.
M/s. Jyoti Limited Versus Asstt. Commr. of Income tax And Vice-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11063 (ITAT-AMRITSAR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51194&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - The objection was not raised by the appellants within 30 days even from the date of issuance of notice under Section 148. The assessee had lost the right to raise the objection by efflux of time.
M/s. ELITE PHARMACEUTICALS AND ANR. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 46 (1), KOLKATA
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11062 (HC-CALCUTTA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=66065&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
HC - The payment of gratuity was made by the assessee, not on its own but at the instance and on behalf of the employees, whose services, though terminated in the assessee company, were taken over by the transferee company. Allowable.
The Wallace Flour Mills Co. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax Central CircleI
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11061 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=66229&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Since no expenditure (purchase of land shown as stock in trade) having been claimed by the assessee in the profit and loss account while computing its total income, no disallowance u/s 40A(3) can be made.
M/s Tirupati Construction Versus Dy. Commr. of Income tax 2 (1), Ujjain
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11060 (ITAT-INDORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51198&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Legal fiction created U/s 40(a)(ia) cannot be extended for levy of penalty U/s 271(1)(c).
Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2, Jaipur Versus M/s Preeya Home Study Pvt. Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11059 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50996&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - As no portion of the income of non-resident associate companies is arising from the supply of parts etc., therefore not liable for tax in India. No TDS u/s 195.
Honda Cars India Ltd. Versus DCIT (LTU) , New Delhi and Vica-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11058 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51200&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The expression used in the statement given u/s 132(4) cannot be taken as determinative factor for deciding the character of the purchase of shares.
Shri Madan I. Jain Versus DCIT, Circle 4 (1) Inv. Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11057 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51067&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - The paramount consideration of section 40A(3) is to curb and reduce the possibilities of black money transactions and section does not eliminate considerations of business expediencies. Cash payments made to Electricity Company for the supply of Electricity not attracted u/s.40(A)(3).
M/s. Shiv Krupa Tin Containers Versus The ITO, SK Ward-1, Himatnagar
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11055 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50988&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Company was treated as deemed owner for the limited purpose of claiming of depreciation. Therefore, company never became the owner of the land and building. As such, sale proceeds received by Director of the company is taxable in the hands of Director and not in the hands of assessee-company.
DCIT, Circle-1, Kolkata Versus M/s Ajanta Fine Foods Pvt. Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11054 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=50186&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Job work done in the spare capacity is also eligible for deduction u/s 80IB.
M/s. Sri Vasavi Compounding, Yanam Versus ITO, Ward-2, Kakinada and Vica-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11052 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51205&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Higher rate of @ 30% is applicable on plastic moulds used in the premises of various vendors for manufacturing plastic and rubber goods.
Honda Motorcycle & Scooter India [P] Ltd. vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11051 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
S. 80-IB: Fact that the AO allowed s. 80-IB deduction in the year of setting up does not disentitle him from examining the eligibility in subsequent years. As per the CBDT’s low tax effect circular, the tax effect has to be seen each year irrespective of the fact that a common issue arises over several years
CIT vs. Micro Instruments Company
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11050 (HC-P&H) · Section 80-IB
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.