Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,624 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 04 Jan 2017
    S. 143(2)/ 143(3): Proper service of the notice u/s 143(2) is mandatory and its failure renders the assessment order void. The fact that an unauthorized person appeared on behalf of the assessee before the AO does not mean that the notice was properly served

    DCIT vs. M. K. Enterprise

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11813 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · Sections 143(2), 143(3)

  2. Direct Tax ·P&H High Court · 05 Jan 2017
    S. 10(23C)(vi)/ (via)/ 80G: The law laid down in Visvesvaraya Technological University vs. ACIT 384 ITR 37 (SC) is that the generation of surplus is not fatal to the grant of exemption u/s 10(23C)(vi)(via)/ 80G if such surplus is utilized for charitable purposes. The fact that the hospital charges of the assessee, as compared to other commercial establishments, are very nominal, throws further light on its charitable character

    CIT vs. Gulab Devi Memorial Hospital Trust

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11812 (HC-P&H) · Sections 10(23C)(vi)/ (via), 80G

  3. Direct Tax ·ITAT Visakhapatnam · 05 Jan 2017
    S. 50C: The stamp duty value on the date of the agreement to sell has to be adopted and not the value on the date of the deed of sale. The proviso to s. 50C, though inserted by the Finance Act 2016 w.e.f. 01.04.2017, has to be given retrospective effect from 01.04.2003 as it is intended to remove an undue hardship and is curative in nature

    Chalasani Naga Ratna Kumari vs. ITO

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11811 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM) · Section 50C

  4. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - TDS u/s 194C applicable on availing of composite set of services such as stevedoring, loading and unloading, etc. and not u/s 194J.

    DCIT (TDS) -1 (1), Mumbai Versus M/s. CMA CGM Global India Private Limited.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11810 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53903&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  5. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Cost of the services provided by the AEs has been allocated on a formula which has been followed form year to year and there is no merit in disallowance of the cost incurred on receipt of support services from its AE.

    Eaton Industries Manufacturing GmbH Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax (International Taxation) -I, Pune

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11809 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53904&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Nagpur · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Contract of supply of material is a separate distinct contract and on which no deduction is permissible u/s 194C.

    The Income-tax Officer (TDS), Ward-2 (3) , Chandrapur Versus Maharashtra State Power Generation Co. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11808 (ITAT-NAGPUR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53905&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - AO has failed to strike off either of the limbs of section 271(1)(c) of the Act, which are not satisfied by the assessee and consequently, notice issued under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(c) of the Act is bad in law.

    Shri Raviraj Vikas Takawane Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle – 2 (3), Pune

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11807 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53906&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Baggase/husk is not a waste but is a by-product of agriproduce processing industry which was purchased and not collected & processed or treated by the assessee, which is a pre-requisite for claiming deduction u/s.80JJA.

    M/s. Pranav Agro Industries Ltd. Versus DCIT, Circle-4, Pune, ACIT, Circle-4, Pune

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11806 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53907&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Direct Tax ·Karnataka High Court · 05 Jan 2017
    HC - No stay on recovery of demand since assessee has the capacity to pay, may be by out of his movable or immovable properties and inspite of that the ground is contended as of hardship, same cannot be termed as genuine hardship.

    M/s. MOOKAMBIKA ASSOCIATES Versus SSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (1), BENGALURU AND OTHERS

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11805 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68109&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Direct Tax ·MP High Court · 05 Jan 2017
    HC - There is no statutory provision under the Income Tax Act, 1961, which provides that in case search was conducted/assessment proceeding under Section 153A has been initiated then the tax, which remains unpaid by the assessee for the same period cannot be recovered from the assessee.

    Neo Corp International Ltd. through Sunil Trivedi Versus Principal, Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11804 (HC-MP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68161&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Ahmedabad · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Assessee has utilized other funds (apart from sale consideration) for constructing residential house, for this reason only he cannot be denied deduction u/s 54.

    Bhailalbhai N. Patel Versus DCIT, Circle-4, Baroda

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11803 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53910&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - No TDS u/s 194C even if payment is made to an Agent so long as the payment is meant for meeting the expenditure in the form of payment to the railways.

    M/s. Ras Polybuild Products P. Ltd. Versus The DCIT, Circle-3 (1), Hyderabad

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11802 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53706&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Visakhapatnam · 05 Jan 2017
    ITAT - No transfer within the meaning of sec. 2(47) when a partner received his share in the partnership business. No revision u/s 263 as the order passed by the A.O. is not prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

    Desu Babu Rao Machilipatnam Versus CIT, Vijayawada

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11801 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53912&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  14. Direct Tax ·Delhi High Court · 04 Jan 2017
    HC - Benefit u/s 10B available despite assessee's Forex receipt not direct, but exports made through its sister concern.

    Pr. CIT. Vs. Earth Stone Group

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11800 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 10B

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 04 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) is a statutory disallowance, therefore enhanced profits due to disallowance shall be considered for deduction u/s 10B.

    ITO – 2 (1) (4), Mumbai Versus M/s Anthelio Business Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (formerly known as Con Join Solutions Pvt. Ltd.) And Vice-Versa

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11799 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53896&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 04 Jan 2017
    ITAT - Since no show cause notice was given to the assessee before making the order proposing conduct of special audit u/s 142(2A), the assessment order passed is beyond the period of limitation and hence, the same is invalid and bad in law.

    The Income Tax Officer (Central), Kolhapur Versus Vilsons Particle Board Industries Ltd. and Vica-Versa

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11798 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53902&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Direct Tax ·Rajasthan High Court · 04 Jan 2017
    HC - Where an educational institution carries on the activity of education primarily for educating persons, the fact that it makes a surplus does not lead to the conclusion that it ceases to exist solely for educational purposes and becomes an institution for the purpose of making profit.

    Commissioner of Income Tax, Alwar Versus Model Public School Society, Bhiwadi

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11797 (HC-RAJASTHAN) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68137&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  18. Direct Tax ·Rajasthan High Court · 04 Jan 2017
    HC - Merely because commission agent has not appeared, sales commission cannot be disallowed.

    Harish Clays Versus ACIT, Circle, Jaipur & Anr.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11796 (HC-RAJASTHAN) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=68140&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Direct Tax ·ITAT Pune · 04 Jan 2017
    ITAT - In cases where penalty proceedings have been initiated on a different footing and the CIT(A) reverses the same, there is change in opinion and basis for levy of penalty for concealment varies. There is no merit in levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c).

    Shri Dilip D. Jain Versus ACIT, Central Circle-3, Nashik

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11795 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53882&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Jaipur · 04 Jan 2017
    ITAT - The wife of the assessee could have included the value of construction for mortgage purposes and this alone does not mean that construction was carried out by the wife of the assessee out of her own funds so as to deny the assessee the benefit of exemption u/s 54F.

    Mahadev Balai Versus I.T.O., Ward 7 (2), Jaipur

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 11794 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=53770&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.