Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,598 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Gujarat High Court · 06 Jul 2017
    S. 147: If the subject matter of the reopening is also the subject matter of appeal, the principle of merger would apply. There cannot be two separate considerations to the same subject matter relatable to the income, one by the appellate authority and another by the AO in fresh assessment. Scope of third proviso to s. 147 explained

    Radhaswami Salt Works vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13131 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section. 147

  2. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 30 Jun 2017
    Transfer Pricing ALP of foreign advances: If the advances are made to a AE situated abroad, the LIBOR rate has to considered to determine the Arms Length interest and not the interest rate in India (SBI PLR). This would be reasonable and proper in applying commercial principles

    CIT. vs. Aurionpro Solutions Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13103 (HC-BOMBAY)

  3. Direct Tax ·Orissa High Court · 30 Jun 2017
    Certified copy of Order Sheet: It is the right of every assessee to seek certified copies of entire order sheet of any assessment proceeding on payment of charges. The certified copies have to be handed over forthwith on payment

    Shankarlal Khaitan vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13102 (HC-ORISSA)

  4. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 29 Jun 2017
    S. 69C/ 153C: An admission of the assessee which is retracted cannot be the basis of addition. The allegations made by the authorities have to be supported by actual cash passing hands. The addition cannot be sustained in the absence of material which would conclusively show that huge amounts revealed from the seized documents are transferred from one side to another and if the Revenue did not bring on record a single statement of the vendors of the land in different villages and if none of the sellers has been examined to substantiate the claim of the Revenue that extra cash has actually changed hands

    CIT vs. Lavanya Land Pvt. Ltd

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13095 (HC-BOMBAY) · Sections 69C, 153C

  5. Direct Tax ·Gujarat High Court · 27 Jun 2017
    S. 147/148: Law on validity of reopening of assessment when the AO is acting on the dictates of the audit party and is not applying his own mind explained

    Mehsana District Central Co-op Bank Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13089 (HC-GUJARAT) · Sections. 147, 148

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 27 Jun 2017
    S. 143(2) notice: If the Department fails to produce evidence relating to the issue and service of the s. 143(2) notice, an adverse inference has to be drawn as per s. 114 of the Evidence Act. The s. 143(3) assessment order has to be held invalid and void ab initio

    ITO. vs. Gravity Systems Pvt. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13088 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section. 143(2)

  7. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 22 Jun 2017
    S. 14A/ Rule 8D: (i) The computation under clause (f) of Explanation 1 to section 115JB(2) is to be made without resorting to the computation as contemplated u/s 14A read with Rule 8D of the Income tax Rules 1962, (ii) Only those investments are to be considered for computing the average value of investment which yielded exempt income during the year

    ACIT. Vs. Vireet Investment Pvt. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13060 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section. 14A

  8. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 21 Jun 2017
    Capital Gains: While a family arrangement/settlement does not amount to a "transfer" u/s 2(47) as it only recognizes "pre-existing rights" between the parties, the same applies only to members of the families and not to transfers made by corporate entities. The corporate veil can never be lifted at the instance of the company itself because that would amount to its denying its own corporate existence. The fact that the Company is wholly owned by the members of the family is irrelevant

    B.A.Mohota Textiles Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13054 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 2(47)

  9. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 21 Jun 2017
    S. 92C +/- 5%: The contention that there is an error because mere mathematical calculation shows that the arm's length purchase price as worked out by the TPO falls beyond (+)/(-) 5% range and consequently falls outside the scope of the second proviso to s. 92C(2) cannot be considered if it was not raised before the CIT(A) & ITAT

    CIT. vs. Mettler Toledo India Pvt. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13053 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 92C

  10. Direct Tax ·Cic · 21 Jun 2017
    RTI Act: Even if the information has no public interest, it has to be disclosed. Nothing is personal with regard to a public servant discharging his duties. Citizens have right know about his working, honesty, integrity and devotion to duty. Information as to leave availed of, or trips undertaken, cannot be denied on grounds of being personal information. The Income-tax Dept is directed to conduct periodic seminars to familiarize officials about the RTI Act. CPIO warned to be extremely careful & vigilant when answering RTI applications failing which penal action would be imposed

    Radha Raman Tripathy vs. CPIO/ JCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13052 (CIC)

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Lucknow · 15 Jun 2017
    (i) S. 153A/ 153C: When the Addl CIT records that he is granting “mechanical approval” u/s 153D to the draft assessment order for want of time to have meaningful discussion, the assessment order is bad in law and has to be annulled (ii) The Respondent is entitled to raise an objection under Rule 27 even in respect of fresh issues. It is not necessary that the ground should have been decided against the Respondent by the CIT(A)

    AAA Paper Marketing Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13025 (ITAT-LUCKNOW) · Sections 153A, 153C

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 15 Jun 2017
    S. 147/ 148: Entire law on reopening of assessments in the context of "change of opinion" vs. "failure to apply mind", with reference to s. 114 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 and all judgements on the point discussed

    Crescent Construction Co vs. ACIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13024 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 147, 148

  13. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - Salary accrued to non-resident seafarers for services rendered outside India on foreign ships shall not be included in the total income merely because such salary was credited in NRE account in India.

    Shyamak Gopal Chattopadhyay. vs. DDIT (I.T.)

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13007 (ITAT-KOLKATA)

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - As per Rule 8D, AO is duty bound to record satisfaction for rejecting assessee’s explanation of not incurring any expenditure for earning exempt income, but no specific format is provided under the Act for recording the satisfaction.

    G. E. India Exports Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13006 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section. 14A

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 to 151 - Since no proceedings were pending before AO when he issued the letter of enquiry, therefore enquiry letter was not valid in eyes of law - Assessee not required to respond to this invalid and non est letter of inquiry issued by the AO.

    Tajendra Kumar Ghai C/o M/s. RRA Taxindia Versus ITO – 1 (5) Rudrapur

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13005 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=56550&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  16. Direct Tax ·ITAT Kolkata · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - Cash payments made to West Bengal State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (WBSEDCL) is covered by the exception Rule 6DD(b) - No disallowance u/s. 40A(3).

    Narayan Rice Mill Versus Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13004 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=56547&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - Cancellation of recovery of the interest - If the income does not result at all, there cannot be a tax, even though in accounts, an entry is made about the "hypothetical income" which does not materialise.

    Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 11 (1), CR Building, New Delhi Versus M/s Ferrous Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13003 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=56546&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 12 Jun 2017
    ITAT - Assessee is a Public Ltd. Company and having taken loan from a subsidiary which is also a public Ltd., provisions of section 2(22)(e) will not attract to the present case of the assessee.

    Balkrishna Industries Ltd. Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax, CIT Cir Rg 6 (1), Mumbai

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13002 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=56538&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 10 Jun 2017
    SC - As per Technical Collaboration Agreement, technical fees for plant set-up as capital expenditure.

    Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. Vs. CIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13001 (SC)

  20. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 10 Jun 2017
    Technical know-how: Entire law explained on whether expenditure incurred under a Technical Collaboration Agreement for setting up of new plant for the first time to manufacture cars constitutes capital or revenue expenditure

    Honda Siel Cars India Ltd. vs. CIT

    (2017) TaxCorp(LJ) 13000 (SC)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.