-
ITAT - Advances to wife allowed as write off u/s. 28 as money advanced were in the nature of business advances.
Mr. Jackie Shroff Vs ACIT
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16394 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
ITAT - AO to re-compute interest u/s. 244A by first adjusting the amount of refund already granted towards the interest component and balance to be adjusted towards the tax component.
Bank of Baroda Vs DCIT
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16393 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 140A, 244A
-
ITAT - There is nothing to justify the assessee’s explanation of the cash with him as on account of an advance against sale of his residential house. Addition u/s 69A confirmed.
GEETA GOPAL, PROP. GOPAL TYRES VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER, KAPURTHALA
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16392 (ITAT-AMRITSAR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69395&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - No additions can be made on the basis of material found from an unconnected person when even the said person had not admitted that it relates to the assessee.
KHUSHPAT J. SHAH VERSUS DCIT CC 2 (4) , MUMBAI
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16391 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69407&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Since assessee has not produced any details or evidence regarding quantity of crops sold, date on which sold, the cost of expenditure incurred, the rate at which sold etc., additions of agricultural income confirmed.
SMT. ANNAPURNA VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD – 1, TUMKUR.
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16390 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69409&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Valuation of shares - Restriction as per Rule 11U(a) on the auditor’s acceptance as Accountant for the purposes of Rule 11UA (2) is well founded.
M/S. KOTTARAM AGRO FOODS PVT. LTD. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (OSD) , RANGE – 4 (1) , BANGALORE.
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16389 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69410&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Trust is entitled to exemption under section 11 and 12 when it receives the hostel fees and transportation facilities from the students of the educational Institution.
AKASH EDUCATION SOCIETY VERSUS JCIT, RANGE-3, NOIDA
(2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 16387 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69398&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Assessee had given a reasonable explanation for the lower gross profit shown by it during the relevant previous year as such addition for lower gross profit was not warranted.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, MADURAI VERSUS M/S. SRI KRISHNA NAGAI MALIGAI (P) LTD
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16384 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69388&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Assessee does not carry the matter in further appeal in view of the smallness of the amount involved, it does not mean that the assessee conceded to have either concealed the income or furnished inaccurate particulars thereof. No penalty u/s 271(1)(c).
DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 14 (2) , NEW DELHI VERSUS M/S KOBELCO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT INDIA PVT. LTD.
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16383 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69384&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - There is nothing on record that the assessee has wound up the business but there is a temporary lull in the business. Deduction cannot be disallowed.
ACIT, CIR, -7 (1) -1, MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. GAMMON OVERSEAS ENGINEERS P. LTD.
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16381 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69391&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Date of TDS payment has to relate back to the date of online payment and not the date of credit into account of Revenue
Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16378 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 201(1A)
-
ITAT - No disallowance of exemption u/s 54F where the assessee has entered into both types of agreement i.e.both purchase and construction and both these are essentially running concomitantly.
DR. KUSHAGRA KATARIA VERSUS DCIT, CIRCLE 1 (1) , GURGAON
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16377 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69355&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed when income is determined on estimate basis.
SHRI VIVEK JAIRATH VERSUS DCIT, CIRCLE-2, GHAZIABAD.
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16376 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69359&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - When there is no adjustment made in the arms length price, penalty u/s 271G imposed is not justified; even where failure was to furnish information or documents in respect of segmental amount relating to transaction made with AEs and non-AEs for determination of arms length price of international transactions.
DCIT 5 (2) (2) , AAYAKAR BHAVAN M.K ROAD VERSUS LAXMI DIAMOND P. LTD., MUMBAI
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16375 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69360&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Revision order u/s 263 directing the A.O. to carry through proper enquiry cannot be said to be liable to be set aside.
M/S. EXPO GAS CONTAINERS LTD. VERSUS CIT-6, MUMBAI
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16374 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69363&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - It is just and fair to allow 30% deduction instead of 20% granted by the DVO by considering the negative factors to the land.
SMT. VELURI SURYA PRAKASAM VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-1 (1) , RAJAHMUNDRY
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16373 (ITAT-VISAKHAPATNAM) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=69364&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Entire law on whether the situs of sale of intangible property like trademarks & patents is the place where the contract is entered into or where the intangible is registered or where the owner is resident explained in the context of s. 9(1)(i) of Income-tax Act & the law on sales-tax
Lal Products vs. Intelligence Officer
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16371 (HC-KERALA)
-
Guidelines specified to ensure expeditious hearing of cases referred to Special Benches and Third Members: Inordinate delay in fixation of hearing of Special Bench & Third Member cases is inappropriate and contrary to the scheme of the Act. It also reduces the efficacy and utility of the mechanism to deal with important matters
Doshi Accounting Services Pvt Ltd vs. DCIT
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16370 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
S. 22 ALV: If the assessee is a builder but is not engaged in the business of letting of property, the unsold flats held as stock in trade is assessable to tax under the head 'income from house property' (Sambhu Investment 263 ITR 143 (SC), Chennai Properties 373 ITR 673(SC), Rayala Corp 386 ITR 500 (SC) referred/ distinguished)
CIT vs. Gundecha Builders (Bombay High Court)
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16369 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 22
-
ITAT - No TDS u/s 194-I on demurrage charges paid for the delay of loading/unloading of the goods.
Jindal Saw Limited Vs ITO
(2018) TaxCorp(LJ) 16364 (ITAT-RAJKOT) · Section 194-I
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.