-
There is a reasonable cause on the part of the assessee in not deducting TDS on the LTC payments made towards foreign travel. Accordingly we hold that penalty u/s 271C is not sustainable. Accordingly we set aside the order passed by the ld CIT(A) and direct the AO to delete the penalty levied u/s 271C of the Act for the year under consideration.
STATE BANK OF INDIA VERSUS THE ACIT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, TDS, RANGE-3, BENGALURU
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21154 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82165&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
In the case of delayed deposit of employees’ contribution to PF, the same will not be deductable in computing income under section 28 of the Act.
SEQUEL LOGOSTICS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21153 (HC-GUJARAT) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82524&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
If ITSC decides against the assessee, holding that the contract was indivisible, there would be an additional tax liability upon the assessee, which demand can be raised only once a decision has been rendered in terms of Sec. 245D(4) on the issues posed before it, i.e., whether at all the income from offshore supply is liable to tax in India.
M/s.Hitachi Power Europe GmbH Vs Income tax Settlement Commission Additional
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21152 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 245D(2C)
-
While we restrain from making any observations on the conduct of the representatives of the assessee, we find it difficult to believe that a big-4 accounting firm, as the assessee's representative before the DRP, as indeed before us, is, would really be oblivious of the correct legal position and it was anything less than a calculated ignorance, before the DRP, on the basic legal position.
Technimont Pvt Ltd Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (IT)
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21151 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
A conjoint reading of clause (d) of the proviso to sub-section (5) of Section 43 of the Act and the explanation attached to it makes it clear that if a transaction in trading of derivatives is carried out electronically on screen based system through a stock broker or sub-broker and it is supported by a time stamped contract note issued by such broker which indicates unique client identity and PAN number of the client, it shall be an eligible transaction” and shall not be deemed to be a speculative transaction.
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, BHOPAL VERSUS M/S DIAMOND SECURITIES PVT. LTD.,
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21150 (HC-MP) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82501&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
The factual aspects of the affairs of the dissolved Company have to be gone into by the Assessing Officer and hence the learned Single Judge rightly remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer and issued directions as stated supra. Section 506(5) proviso (a) of the Companies Act and Chapter XV of the Income Tax Act which deals with liability in special cases and its clause (L) which deals with discontinuance of business or dissolution and these provisions provide as to how and in what manner the liability against such Company arising under the Companies Act and under the Income Tax Act is required to be dealt with.
KAMALA MUTHIAH AS THE ERSTWHILE DIRECTOR OF M/S. M. CT. M. CORPORATION PVT. LTD. (NOW DISSOLVED) VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21149 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82503&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
On creation of the trust the trustees apply for registration under Section 12AA. In that case, they would have to demonstrate the genuineness of the objects of the trust, only, before the Commissioner. Secondly, the other situation where the trustees carry on activities for sometime and then apply for registration. In that case, the genuineness of the objects as well as the genuineness of its activities have to be proved to the Commissioner.
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) VERSUS SHRI NATHJI GOVERDHAN NATHJI CHARITABLE TRUST
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21148 (HC-CALCUTTA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82508&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
The machinery components have been imported in India to commission a custom-made plant for the buyer and those imported goods may not be used for any other customer. The assessee has been entrusted the work of commissioning of the TPD plant in view of the expertise in this field.
M/S. VOITH PAPER GMBH VERSUS DDIT, CIRCLE-2 (2) , NEW DELHI
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21147 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82145&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
If the objections are invalid as time barred having not been filed within the time prescribed under sub-section (2) of section 144C, the AO will have to act in terms of Section 144C(3)(b) and complete the assessment within the time prescribed u/s 144C(4)(b) of the Act, namely, within one month from the end of the month in which the period of filing of objections under sub-section (2) expires.
TDK ELECTRONICS AG (FORMERLY KNOWN AS EPCOS AG) C/O. EPCOS INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS ACIT (IT), CIRCLE-1, PUNE
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21146 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82130&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Auto-generated communication dated 24.3.2019 which contained the note of withholding of the refund in terms of Section 241A of the Act, does not satisfy any of the legal tests for passing said order. Firstly, it is not passed by the Assessing Officer who is competent to do so. Secondly, it is not even an order, it is a mere auto-generated communication. Thirdly, it does not contain any reasons recorded in writing and lastly it is not passed with the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.
VODAFONE IDEA LIMITED VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CPC, JT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (OSD) -5 (2) (2), DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21145 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82486&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
The interpretation of the Tribunal is incorrect. Those clauses nowhere stipulates that the assessee is not bound to report to the agent any enquiry which may have received directly or indirectly. From reading of the agreement it is clear that no order can be processed by assessee without services the agent.
VENUS INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION VERSUS ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21144 (HC-P&H) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82488&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
The Tribunal committed an error in holding that the expenditure incurred on replacement of plant and machinery is a capital expenditure. In such circumstances, we answer the first substantial question of law in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue. We take notice of the fact that while disturbing the finding of fact recorded by the CIT(A), the Tribunal has not assigned any good reason.
PRECISION WIRES INDIA LIMITED VERSUS ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21143 (HC-GUJARAT) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82489&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
Section 156 of the Act which deals with notice of demand and thereafter Rule 15 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 which says that notice of demand under Section 156 shall be in Form No. VII. Clause (3) of Form VII provides that the notice of demand under Section 156 of the Act shall contain a provision informing the concerned assessee that if he did not pay the amount within the period specified, he would be liable to pay simple interest at one and one-half percent for every month or part of a month from the date commencing after end of the period in accordance with Section 220(2) of the Act.
VINAY DOLATRAI VALIA VERSUS A.S. THAKUR & ORS.
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21142 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82490&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
The object of Section 10(17A) is to reward an individual who has been recognized by the Centre or the State for rendition of services in public interest. While clause (i) is concerned with an award whether in cash or in kind, instituted in public interest by the Central or any State Government or instituted by any other body and approved by the Central Government in this behalf, clause (ii) refers to a reward by the Central or a State Government for such purposes as may be approved by the Central Government in this behalf in public interest.
K. VIJAYA KUMAR VERSUS THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI.
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21141 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=82496&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip
-
Since, the service tax rules provides for payment of service tax on receipt basis, the assessee is allowed to deduct the quantity of the amount not received during the year in the computation of income.
Spar Krognos Marketing Pvt. Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21140 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
In view of the language employed by Parliament in sub-section (3) to Section 201 of the Act, the Assessing Officer cannot pass any order after expiry of two years before 01.10.2014.
M/s. L&T Thales Technology Services Private Ltd. Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation -2(2)
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21139 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Section 201
-
Keeping in view totality of circumstances on the touch stone of preponderance of probabilities, the entire transaction for sale of gold jewellery is an afterthought and a sham transaction which is claimed by assessee as he was cornered by Revenue.
Shri A.N.Muthiah Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21138 (ITAT-CHENNAI)
-
Assessee intends to avail the opportunity provided under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Bill, 2020.
Prabir Mitra Vs Income Tax Officer
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21137 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
-
Assessment on non-existing amalgamated entity void-ab-initio & unsustainable; Follows Maruti Suzuki SC-ruling
Siemens Limited, (Successor in Interest to Siemens VIA Metals Technologies Private Limited) Vs The ACIT
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21136 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
A Commissioner is bound to consider whether the objects of the Trust are genuinely charitable in nature and whether the activities which the Trust proposed to carry on are genuine in the sense that they are in line with the objects of the Trust.
Ananda Social And Educational Trust Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
(2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 21135 (SC) · Section 12AA
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.