-
Pendency of appeal before HC on eligibility of income for exemption under Section 11 cannot be a reason for PCIT to cancel registration.
Devaraj Urs Educational Trust for Backward Classes Vs Principal CIT (Central)
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29419 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 12A
-
Reopening reasons have to be read on standalone basis without any scope of addition, deletion or substitution therein even if supportive material emerges at a later stage.
Sanjay Sadashiv Navale Vs DCIT
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29418 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
Where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no action to exercise powers of revision can arise, nor can revisional power be exercised for directing a fuller enquiry to find out if the view taken is erroneous.
Genpact Consulting [Singapore] Pte Ltd Vs The C.I.T
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29417 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
Assessing officer can grant deposit orders of a lesser amount than 20% pending appeal without making reference to the administrative Pr.CIT/CIT.
Queen Agencies Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29404 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 220(6)
-
By merely transferring funds as unsecured loan or advances towards share capital will not trigger the deeming provision under section 56(2)(viib).
Impact RetailTech Fund Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO -6(2)(4)
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29403 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 56(2)(viib)
-
The conclusion of the PCIT that it is necessary to maintain separate books of account is not sustainable.
Virtusa Consulting Services Pvt. Ltd Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29402 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 263
-
Government is directed to decide on the submissions preferred by the Petitioner w.r.t. amendments creating Faceless ITAT as early as possible and practicable.
Praveen Kumar Bansal Vs MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29401 (HC-DELHI)
-
The preamble of VsV Act provides for resolution of disputed tax and for matters connected therewith. The emphasis is on disputed tax, not income.
Sadruddin Tejani Vs Income Tax Oficer
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29400 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 264
-
Sec.119(2)(b) does not preclude CBDT from passing a special order in any given case from condoning the delay in filing Form No.10B beyond 365 days despite passing a general order.
Little Angels Education Society Vs Union of India and others
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29399 (HC-BOMBAY)
-
It cannot be categorically concluded out the demerger scheme does not constitute, directly or indirectly, distribution by a company of accumulated profits, whether capitalised or not, if such distribution entails the release by the company to its shareholders of all or any part of the assets of the company.
Grasim Industries Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29398 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The order passed by Tribunal is bereft of any reasoning and suffers from the vice of non-application of mind. The Tribunal which is a final fact finding authority has to assign reasons in support of its decision.
GMR Sports Pvt. Ltd Vs PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29397 (HC-KARNATAKA)
-
Since the provision was either not unworkable nor was inconsistent with other provisions of the Act, therefore applying principle of reading down merely on the basis of hardship or equity are not relevant in the interpretation of the law relating to taxation.
A. Kowsalya Bai Vs UNION OF INDIA
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29396 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Sections 206AA, 139A
-
CIT(A) can tax the income which the Revenue had expressly or impliedly held as non-taxable but the CIT(A) cannot tax an item of income whose taxability had not even been considered by the Revenue.
Angel Cement Pvt. Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29395 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
Assessment order on non-existent company was without jurisdiction, liable to be set-aside and participation in the assessment proceedings by assessee would not operate as an estoppel against law.
Teleperformance Global Services Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29388 (HC-BOMBAY)
-
Claim of assessee to characterize the gain arising on sale of land parcels in question to be chargeable under the head capital gain cannot be dislodged and replaced by business income.
Mohanlal Laljibhai Ghodasara Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29387 (ITAT-RAJKOT)
-
Sec.2(22)(e) can only be invoked in case of a shareholder who is holding substantial interest.
Petal Motocon Pvt Ltd Vs I.T.O
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29386 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section 2(22)(e)
-
Assessee sold the property on behalf of a non-resident and transferred the money to the non-resident and according to Sec.163, assessee is an agent of the non-resident.
Manish Tyagi Vs ITO
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29385 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
When the necessary details and documents are furnished by the assessee to AO and a particular view is taken by AO, it's not open for the CIT u/s 263 to take a different view.
The Peerless General Finance & Investment Company Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29384 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · Section 263
-
Income declared by assessee is eligible for assessment of income u/s68 or 69, not Sec. 271AAB which requires the case to fall within the expression undisclosed income.
Shiv Bhagwan Gupta Vs ACIT
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29383 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · Section 271AAB
-
CIT(A) cannot touch upon issues which do not arise from the order of assessment and outside the scope of order of assessment.
Trimurty Buildcon Pvt. Ltd Vs I.T.O.
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29382 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.