Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

All landmark rulings

21,722 rulings

  1. Direct Tax ·Madras High Court · 11 Mar 2014
    The assessee is entitled to its claim of exemption on the income derived from warehousing charges, supervision charges, fumigation charges, weigh bridge receipts and sale of tender forms and interest collected on belated refund of advance alone; however, on the income from house property, income on bank deposits, loans and advances made to the members of the staff, interest on fixed deposits and dividend income, the assessee is not entitled to any relief of exemption under Section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act.

    Tamilnadu Warehousing Corporation vs Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2719 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax Section 10(29)

  2. Direct Tax ·ITAT Jodhpur · 12 Mar 2014
    Any income disclosed in the form of assets u /s 132(4) r.w. sub-section (2) of section 271AAA cannot be a ground for imposition of penalty as the assessee has paid taxes alongwith interest as per statement itself which was modified on the basis of accrual working of income.

    Shri Vinod Singhvi vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2718 (ITAT-JODHPUR) · Income Tax Section 132(4) r.w.s Expl. (5) to Section 271(1)(c)/sub-section (2) of section 271AAA

  3. Direct Tax ·Allahabad High Court · 22 Nov 2013
    Amount which was earned by the assessee on these deposits made with it, minus any legitimate expenses incurred in the business, would amount to income of the assessee the deposits themselves could not amount to income.

    Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) vs Sahara India (Firm)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2717 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  4. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 12 Mar 2014
    The term ‘relative’ has been defined in Explanation to Section 56(2), which includes Hindu Undivided Family. However, HUF has been included in the list of ‘relative’ by the Finance Act, 2009 w.e.f. 01-10-2009. The case in hand relates to the AY.2008-09, the assessee cannot take the benefit of the amendment from retrospective effect. The assessee is liable to pay tax on the cash gift received during the AY.2008-09.

    M Veluswamy vs Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2716 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Income Tax Section Section 56(2)

  5. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 22 Nov 2013
    Demerger, set-off of brought forward losses of a demerged undertaking is permitted if the undertaking is hived off ‘as a going concern’.

    KBD Sugars & Distilleries Ltd vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2715 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax Section 72(A)

  6. Direct Tax ·ITAT Bangalore · 31 Oct 2013
    Merely pays booking amount more than one year prior to date of transfer, assessee can’t be denied Sec. 54F relief.

    Gopilal Laddha vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2714 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax Section 54F

  7. Direct Tax ·P&H High Court · 17 Jan 2014
    Allotment letter or payment of first installment has entitled the assessee to claim a long term capital gain.

    Madhu Kaul vs Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2713 (HC-P&H) · Income Tax Section 2(47)

  8. Direct Tax ·ITAT Ahmedabad · 22 Nov 2013
    S. 54EC - 'Six months' shall mean a month reckoned according to the British calendar.

    ALKABEN B. PATEL VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2712 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Income Tax Section 54EC, General Clauses Act, 1897

  9. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 11 Mar 2014
    Courtyard cannot be included to calculate the built-up area in terms of Section 80IB(10)

    Commonwealth Developers vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2711 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax Section 80IB(10)

  10. Direct Tax ·Bombay High Court · 05 Mar 2014
    Four row houses being Bungalows having built up area exceeding 1500 sq.ft, were not part and parcel of the housing project, for which the deduction was claimed. The claim of the assessees for the buildings other than the four row houses was in consonance with the condition stipulated in Section 80IB(10) of the Act. Deduction u/s 80IB(10) allowable.

    Commissioner of Income Tax vs Cajetano Mario Pereira

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2710 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax Section 80IB(10)

  11. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 22 Nov 2013
    Foreign travel expenses incurred by the director of the assessee company for exploring the prospects of export of the assessee’s products abroad is allowable business expenditure even if the director incurred such expenditure in the capacity of President of Indian Chemical Council

    ACIT vs East India Pharmaceuticals Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2709 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Income Tax Section 37(1), 32

  12. Direct Tax ·ITAT Chennai · 12 Mar 2014
    Exemption u/s 54F - Approval of building plan is not necessary. Construction of new in place of old residential building, assessee is entitled to claim exemption u/s 54F.

    B Sivasubramanian vs Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2708 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Income Tax Section 54F

  13. Direct Tax ·Gauhati High Court · 03 Mar 2014
    HC issue direction to CIT(A), to ensure expeditious disposal of the appeal.

    BIMAL PAUL vs THE CHAIRMAN, CBDT & 3 ORS

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2707 (HC-GAUHATI)

  14. Direct Tax ·ITAT Panaji · 28 Mar 2014
    ITAT restore the issue back to AO with direction to include not only the profit and gains from the export of the articles but also all the incomes which are taken by the Assessee confirmation of the exclusion of the miscellaneous income, interest from bank, dispatch earned and sundry creditors written back for computation of eligible profit u/s 10B of the Act.

    Sociedade De Fomento Industrial Pvt. Ltd vs DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2706 (ITAT-PANAJI) · Income Tax Section 10B, 147, 143(2), 148

  15. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 19 Jun 2013
    S. 54EC – 6 Month Means 6 British calendar Months

    AQUATECH ENGINEERS vs. ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2705 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  16. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 08 Dec 2011
    Legal profession is not business or trade – SC

    DHANRAJ SINGH CHOUDAHRY VERSUS NATHULAL VISHWAKARMA

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2704 (SC)

  17. Direct Tax ·Supreme Court · 25 Mar 2014
    Section 23 of NDPS Act not applies to transport of Indian ganja – SC

    Union of India Versus Sheo Shambhu Giri

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2703 (SC)

  18. Direct Tax ·ITAT Hyderabad · 14 Mar 2014
    Merely because the copy of the registration u/s 12A is not available with the assessee and the revenue department is not able to trace the file, the copy of the registration, it cannot be said that the assessee is not eligible for recognition u/s 80G of the Act.

    The Andhra Pradesh Federation of Chambers Of Commerce and Trade vs DIT(E)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2702 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income Tax Section 12A, 80G

  19. Direct Tax ·ITAT Delhi · 14 Mar 2014
    Non-filing of Form No. 15G and 15H within the prescribed time

    Vijaya Bank vs Income Tax Officer (TDS)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2701 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax Section 197A

  20. Direct Tax ·ITAT Mumbai · 12 Mar 2014
    S. 56(2)(vii) does not apply to bonus & rights shares offered on a proportionate basis even if the offer price is less than the FMV of the shares.

    Sudhir Menon HUF vs Asst. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2700 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax Section 56(2)(vii)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.