-
Mere no agriculture activity on land will not change the character of agricultural land. No evidence on the record that property in use is converted from agricultural land to non agricultural land prior to sale.
ITO vs Shri Shaukat Karim Prasla
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3318 (ITAT-PANAJI)
-
“Meaning of owner of property” – Amendment of section 269UA w. e. f. 1-4-1988- Income from Business income or house property - The income receipt from letting out of the property was rightly assessed by the Assessing Officer as "income from house property".
Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd vs ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3317 (HC-MADRAS) · S. 22, 23, 28, 269UA
-
S. 10(1) - Hybrid seeds is a product of agricultural activity.
Commissioner of Income Tax vs Prabhat Agri Biotech Limited
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3316 (HC-AP)
-
Section 54F – Allotment date not relevant if Assessee made substantial payment for acquisition of new Flat
ITO Vs. Saroja S. Mekal
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3315 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 54F
-
2nd proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) is retrospective- No Disallowance for non deduction of TDS if recipient of income paid tax on the same
Rajeev Kumar Agarwal Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3314 (ITAT-AGRA)
-
MFN Clause in Double Taxation Avoidance Conventions – To be partial or not to be
Steria (India) Limited
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3313 (AAR)
-
Share Broking Company can set off loss from speculation trade against gain from delivery trading
CIT. Vs. Baljit Securities (P) Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3312 (HC-CALCUTTA)
-
Capital gains not taxable on the basis of mere signing of development agreement
Binjusaria Properties (P.) Ltd. Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3311 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)
-
Reassessment cannot be challenged based on mere subsequent judgment in the case of another assessee
CIT Vs. Kultar Exports
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3310 (HC-DELHI)
-
Section 14A have no application if Assessee not made any claim for exemption
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus CORRTECH ENERGY PVT LTD.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3309 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section 14A
-
(Majority view) Special Bench has no jurisdiction to consider whether an ex-Member of the ITAT can practice before it. (Dissenting view) Special Bench is duty bound to answer the question. On merits, Ex-Member cannot be disbarred from practice before it
Nanubhai D. Desai vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3308 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)
-
AO ought to have made the reference to the Valuation Officer when it was admitted that the assessee had made a claim u/s 50C. Tribunal has correctly sized up the law and has sustained the order of the CIT(A) in directing the AO to refer the valuation of the properties to the Valuation Officer in terms of the provisions of Section 50C(2) of the said Act.
CIT vs KHUSHI RAM BHATNAGAR
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3307 (HC-DELHI)
-
Important guidelines laid down regarding procedure for promotion of ITAT Members to avoid arbitrariness. Suggestion made that there should be a mechanism to oversee the quality of orders passed by ITAT Members
R. P. Tolani, Sunil Kumar Yadav vs. UOI
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3306 (HC-DELHI)
-
No disallowance u/s 14A & Rule 8D can be made if the assessee does not have tax-free income & no claim for exemption is made
CIT vs. Cortech Energy Pvt. Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3305 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section 14A
-
Law laid down on when an isolated transaction can be regarded as an “adventure in the nature of trade” and the taxability of agricultural land situate beyond municipal limits
Smt. Supriya Kanwar vs. ITO
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3304 (ITAT-JODHPUR)
-
S. 147: Strict guidelines laid down to streamline procedure for reopening of assessments
Sahkari Khand Udyog Mandal Ltd vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3303 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section. 147
-
S. 147: Reopening, even within 4 years, solely on the basis of a clarificatory retrospective amendment, is not permissible
Sadbhav Engineering Ltd vs. DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3302 (HC-GUJARAT)
-
TDS on School bus fees to be deducted U/s. 194C – HC
ACIT (TDS) Vs. Lotus Valley Education Society
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3301 (HC-ALLAHABAD)
-
No tax-free income – No Disallowance U/s. 14A r.w. Rule 8D – HC
Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S. Shivam Motors (P) Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3300 (HC-ALLAHABAD)
-
Section 54F – Mere letter of allotment cannot be considered as investment in residential house
Shri Rasiklal M. Parikh Vs. ACIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3299 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.