Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,409 rulings

  1. AAR · 14 Jul 2020
    Once the goods imported are cleared by the Customs authorities, all the provisions of the Customs Law cease to be applicable therefore, it is clear that the activity of import of drill bits by the Applicant is a distinct activity of supply of goods in the course of inter-state trade.

    In the matter of M/s Halliburton Offshore Services Inc (Drill Bits)

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3963 (AAR)

  2. AAR · 14 Jul 2020
    If Banking Company strictly complies with Rule 38 of CGST Rules, 2017 then instead of complying with Section 17(2), the benefit availed directly from Section 17(4) by the applicant is lawful.

    In the matter of Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3962 (AAR)

  3. AAR · 14 Jul 2020
    As per Section 3 of Transfer of Property Act, 1982, chit fund does not come under the purview of actionable claims.

    In the matter of Ushabala Chits Private Limited

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3961 (AAR)

  4. AAR · 14 Jul 2020
    The services provided by applicant is not a service by way of education as a part of curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognized by any law for the time being in force.

    In the matter of Master Minds

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3960 (AAR)

  5. AAR · 13 Jul 2020
    Herein location of supplier is Goa and in terms of section 10 (1) (b) of the IGST Act place of supply will be outside Goa as goods are supplied on behalf of a registered person outside Goa to a place in Goa.

    In the matter of High Tech Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Industries

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3957 (AAR)

  6. AAR · 13 Jul 2020
    Merely classifying any goods as essential commodity will not be the criteria for exempting such goods from GST.

    In the matter of Springfields (India) Distilleries

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3956 (AAR)

  7. Anti-profiteering Authority · 13 Jul 2020
    Income arising out of screening/exhibition of cinematograph films in multiplexes is subjected to entertainment tax of 17.30% which was built into the cost of tickets, however post GST, said entertainment tax was subsumed into GST and rate was fixed at 28%.

    DGAP vs. M/s Prasad Media Corporation Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3950 (NAA)

  8. AAR · 10 Jul 2020
    Provision of services in relation to Town planning and Urban planning are pure services covered under Article 243W as functions entrusted to Municipality. Therefore, as per Sl. No. 3 of Notification No. 12/2017- Central Tax (Rate) dated June 28, 2017 the services are exempt from GST.

    In the matter of Core Project Engineers & Consultants Private Limited

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3949 (AAR)

  9. AAR · 09 Jul 2020
    As per provisions of Section 13(2)(b) of CGST Act, time of supply will be provision of service if the invoice is not raised within prescribed period.

    In the matter of WoodKraft India Limited

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3945 (AAR)

  10. AAR · 09 Jul 2020
    Section 95 of CGST Act states that this authority can give a ruling in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant.

    In the matter of CEAT Limited

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3944 (AAR)

  11. AAR · 09 Jul 2020
    The applicant only cleans and adds flavours to the corn kernels and they do not undergo any processes as per Chapter 7,8 or 11 and even after adding salt, oil and flavours/spices, the essential nature of product still remains as corn kernels i.e the seeds of maize plant.

    In the matter of Gourmet Popcornica LLP

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3943 (AAR)

  12. AAR · 09 Jul 2020
    As per section 2(84) a registered co-operative society is a person within the meaning of the term person and there are two distinct persons (a) Co-operative Housing Society and (b) Member.

    In the matter of Apsara Co-operative Housing Society Limited

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3942 (AAR)

  13. MP High Court · 08 Jul 2020
    The provisions of search and seizure as contained in section 100 (4) of the CrPC is applicable which provides for presence of two or more independent and respectable inhabitants of the locality as witness to the search.

    Subash Joshi & Anr. vs. Director General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3940 (HC-MP)

  14. Gujarat High Court · 08 Jul 2020
    The availment of credit of the taxes paid by the Lessee does not affect the liability of the registered taxpayer to pay the taxes.

    Allied Engineers & Builders Pvt. Ltd. vs. Muthoot Finance Ltd. & Anr.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3939 (HC-GUJARAT)

  15. Gujarat High Court · 08 Jul 2020
    The legality and validity of the show cause should fail having regard to the scope of judicial review and the challenge to the validity of Rule 142(1) (a) of the Rules should also fail.

    Mahavir Enterprise vs. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3938 (HC-GUJARAT)

  16. Delhi High Court · 07 Jul 2020
    Petitioner's Hardcastle Restaurants are allowed to withdraw writ petition and agitate all its contentions before National Anti-Profiteering Authority.

    Hardcastle Restaurants Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. UOI & Anr.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3933 (HC-DELHI)

  17. Bombay High Court · 06 Jul 2020
    Appropriate authority shall give a hearing to the petitioner and thereafter pass a speaking order on the aforesaid application.

    Sotheby’s Art Services (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3930 (HC-BOMBAY)

  18. Bombay High Court · 06 Jul 2020
    Unconditional ad-interim stay is granted on recovery of interest u/s 50 of the GST Act.

    Sahara Hospitality vs. State of Maharashtra

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3929 (HC-BOMBAY)

  19. Anti-profiteering Authority · 03 Jun 2020
    The legal requirement is abundantly clear that in the event of a benefit of Input Tax Credit or reduction in the rate of tax, there must be a commensurate reduction in prices of the goods or services.

    DGAP vs. Phillips India Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3928 (NAA)

  20. Anti-profiteering Authority · 03 Jun 2020
    Respondent has passed on benefit to the end user/final consumer by reducing MRP to the extent of GST rate reduction.

    DGAP vs. Tanya Enterprises (Vini Cosmetics)

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 3927 (NAA)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.