Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,409 rulings

  1. AAR · 11 Aug 2020
    Applicant's contract for construction of flood spill channel is aimed at the improvement of immovable property involving supply of various services and goods in the course of its execution, accordingly, it is a works contract as per section 2 (119) of GST Act, where earthwork exceeds more than 75% of the contract value.

    In the matter of Reach Dredging Ltd

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4070 (AAR)

  2. Kerala High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    An invoice could be issued either at the time of removal of goods or prior to the delivery of the goods and that the same is in consonance with the statute and hence, there is no cause for doubting any evasion of tax as per section 31 of the CGST Act.

    M/s Hero Ecotech Ltd vs. The Assistant Sales Tax Officer

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4068 (HC-KERALA)

  3. Madras High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    If the Assessee fails to make balance payment within the 6 months stipulated period, it is open to the Revenue to resort to the remedy available under law to recover the said amount.

    Shree M. Revathi Printers vs. The Deputy Commissioner Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue Government of India & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4067 (HC-MADRAS)

  4. Gujarat High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    Revenue decided to put the goods and the vehicle to public auction for the purpose of realising the amount towards tax, penalty and fine for which a public advertisement came to be issued.

    M/s Sawariya Traders vs. State of Gujarat

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4066 (HC-GUJARAT)

  5. Delhi High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    HC - Notice to Revenue in respect of rejection of refund application in respect of assessee’s contention that the liability to pay interest u/s 50 of the CGST Act should be confined only to the net tax liability.

    Parnika Commercial and Estates Private Limited vs. Union of India & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4065 (HC-DELHI)

  6. P&H High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    Respondent authorities are directed to positively decide on the matter keeping in view, inter alia, the judgments in case of Valerius Industries & Bindal Smelting P. Ltd.

    RSL Distilleries Pvt. Ltd vs. Union of India and others

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4063 (HC-P&H) · Section 83

  7. Delhi High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    Petitioner is directed to deposit Rs.4,07,451 with Central and State Consumer Welfare Boards within two months.

    Whirlpool of India Ltd. vs. UOI & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4062 (HC-DELHI)

  8. Rajasthan High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    Notice to Revenue is being issued in a writ challenging Rule 36(4) restricting ITC availment.

    Gr Infraprojects Limited vs. Union of India

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4061 (HC-RAJASTHAN)

  9. Rajasthan High Court · 10 Aug 2020
    If the Petitioners’ assertion is found to be correct, the GST Council shall issue necessary recommendation to the Commissioner to enable the petitioners to get the benefit of CENVAT credit within the stipulated time as stipulated by the Union of India.

    Trivedi Ventures LLP vs. Union of India & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4060 (HC-RAJASTHAN)

  10. AAR · 07 Aug 2020
    Poultry fat is classifiable under Chapter Sub-Heading No. 1501 90 00 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and the supply of the same attracts 12% GST.

    In the matter of Sushi Pet Nutrisciences

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4057 (AAR)

  11. AAR · 07 Aug 2020
    Food supplied to Hospital on outsourcing basis is liable to 5% GST.

    In the matter of Navneet Kumar Talla.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4055 (AAR)

  12. AAR · 07 Aug 2020
    Building which is to be constructed by applicant falls within the ambit of immovable property and thereby falls under restriction stipulated in section 17 (5) of the CGST Act.

    In the matter of Daicel Chiral Technologies (India) Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4054 (AAR)

  13. Gujarat High Court · 06 Aug 2020
    Though the petitioner was not having CTD the respondent-authorities could verify the payment of excise duty on the cars purchased by the petitioner from the dealers and on spare parts on the basis of documents submitted by it.

    Downtown Auto Pvt. Ltd vs. Union of India

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4051 (HC-GUJARAT)

  14. Supreme Court · 05 Aug 2020
    The nature of reliefs sought was fully covered by its decision in Blue Bird Pure Pvt. Ltd. which was later followed in several other cases.

    Lease Plan India Pvt. Ltd., Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4049 (SC)

  15. Supreme Court · 05 Aug 2020
    It will be open to the petitioner to request the concerned authority to defer the recording of statement of the petitioner until the lockdown period is over. That request be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law.

    Bioveda Action Research Company vs. Additional Director General Directorate General of Central Goods and Service Tax Intelligence & Anr.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4048 (SC)

  16. Kerala High Court · 05 Aug 2020
    Recovery proceedings for recovery of amounts confirmed against the assessee by the assessment orders shall be kept in abeyance for a period of 6 weeks so as to enable the assessee to move the Appellate Authority.

    Amani Machine Centre vs. The State Tax Officer

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4047 (HC-KERALA)

  17. MP High Court · 04 Aug 2020
    Appeal of petitioner is allowed and bail is granted on furnishing of a bond of Rs.5 lakhs each with separate sureties to the satisfaction of the Trial Court Appeal.

    Amit Bothra & another vs. State of MP

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4044 (HC-MP)

  18. Calcutta High Court · 03 Aug 2020
    While there are no hard and fast rule regarding grant or refusal to grant bail, Each case has to be considered on the touchstone of its own generic facts and individual merits.

    Amit Beriwal vs. State of Odisha

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4041 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  19. Gujarat High Court · 30 Jul 2020
    The basic logic or inception of section 13(8)(b) of the IGST Act,2017 considering the place of supply in case of intermediary to be the location of supply of service is in order to levy CGST and SGST and such intermediary service therefore, would be out of the purview of IGST.

    Material Recycling Association of India vs. Union of India & 2 Others

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4037 (HC-GUJARAT)

  20. Gujarat High Court · 31 Jul 2020
    Revenue is directed to allow the claim of the refund made by the assessee considering the unutilised input tax credit of input services as part of the net input tax credit for the purpose of calculation of the refund of the claim as per Rule 89(5) of the CGST Rules,2017 for claiming refund under Sub-section 3 of Section 54 CGST Act, 2017.

    VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI & 2 Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4036 (HC-GUJARAT)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.