Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

GST landmark rulings

5,409 rulings

  1. Delhi High Court · 21 Sep 2020
    Petitioner had already passed on the benefit amounting to Rs.30,57,775/- to the flat buyers and the balance amount was deposited in the bank account specifically opened for the said purpose and the cheques and credit notes for the entire profiteered amount were drawn but have remained uncleared.

    Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt Ltd vs. Union of India & Ors.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4216 (HC-DELHI)

  2. AAR · 18 Sep 2020
    Notional interest has to be considered as part of value of supply of service, if and only if the said notional interest influences the value of supply and is leviable to GST along with the monthly rent at rate applicable thereto.

    In the matter of M/s Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4212 (AAR)

  3. Delhi High Court · 18 Sep 2020
    As there is an alternative remedy of appeal available to the Assessee therefore, restrains to entertain the prayer, while grants liberty to the Assessee to appeal before the appropriate forum.

    M/s Krishna International vs. Commissioner, Delhi GST

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4211 (HC-DELHI)

  4. Gujarat High Court · 18 Sep 2020
    Upon filing of an application the authority concerned shall immediately take up the application filed by the writ applicant for provisional release of goods and conveyance under Section 67(6) of the Act and pass appropriate order.

    Jay Goga Traders vs. State of Gujarat

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4210 (HC-GUJARAT)

  5. Madras High Court · 18 Sep 2020
    Any observation on the merits of the case is likely to prejudice the case of the parties before us, either the assessee or the Revenue.

    Krome Led Lighting Technologies Pvt. Ltd. vs. The Assistant Commissioner & Anr.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4209 (HC-MADRAS)

  6. Madras High Court · 18 Sep 2020
    It is a settled proposition of law that whenever an application of this nature is made, the statutory authority are bound to consider the claim made and pass a reasoned order.

    M/s Jay Jay Mills vs. The State Tax Officer

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4208 (HC-MADRAS)

  7. AAR · 16 Sep 2020
    The Applicant is engaged in the development and sale of sites for its members and carries out maintenance of layout like cleanliness, upkeep of road and parks and ensures uninterrupted supply of power & water to its residents. Such layout maintenance is a supply in terms of Section 7(1) of CGST Act.

    In the matter of M/s Gnanaganga Gruha NIrmana

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4203 (AAR)

  8. AAR · 16 Sep 2020
    Landfilling pit is a combination of earth work and other capital goods which cannot be solely identified as apparatus, equipment and machinery fixed to earth by foundation & is also not a structural support for anything.

    In the matter of Mother Earth Environ Tech Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4202 (AAR)

  9. Karnataka High Court · 16 Sep 2020
    There is no jurisdictional error in the said notice. The assessee had made his representation on July 06, 2020 and has been given a personal hearing by the proper officer and thereafter, he has passed the order dated July 10, 2020.

    M.S. Retail Pvt. Ltd. vs. UOI

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4201 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  10. P&H High Court · 15 Sep 2020
    It is not provided anywhere that the property or the bank account can remain attached under the order passed under Section 83 of the Act if the proceedings initiated under Section 67 is culminated into the proceedings under Section 63 or Section 74.

    UFV India Global Education vs. Union of India & Ors

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4197 (HC-P&H) · Section 67

  11. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Applicant has contradicted their contention through their submission that maize bran in itself is not a cattle feed but is a major ingredient used in the manufacture of cattle feed.

    In the matter of Gujarat Ambuja Exports Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4196 (AAR)

  12. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Since the procedure of micromanipulation cannot be carried out in the absence of a microscope and that the micromanipulator would be an incomplete product without a microscope, it can safely be concluded that the micromanipulator is nothing but a microscope and should be rightly covered under the head of microscope.

    In the matter of Shivani Scientific Industries Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4195 (AAR)

  13. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    The reliance of Rule 18(A) (A) of the erstwhile Gujarat VAT Rules, 2006 is not warranted as the Value Added Tax Act is no more in existence and does not have any legal value in determination of GST liability since the value of supply is to be arrived in terms of the provisions of the GST Act.

    In the matter of Karma Buildcon

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4194 (AAR)

  14. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    The element of accommodation becomes the primary activity in the entire package & the packages offered by the applicant are naturally bundled and would be aptly covered under the definition of Composite Supply whereby the principal supply would be the accommodation services since the therapy can in no way be administered without accommodation.

    In the matter of Oswal Industries Ltd. (M/s. Nimba Nature Cure Village)

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4193 (AAR)

  15. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    The product stoves falling under Tariff item No.73218990 would be classified under Entry at 183 of Schedule-II of Notification No.01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated January 24, 2018.

    In the matter of Adarsh Plant Protect Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4192 (AAR)

  16. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Bio- fertilizers produced is covered by the entry cultures of microorganisms which falls under Sub-heading No.30029030 of the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.

    In the matter of Novozymes South Asia Pvt. Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4191 (AAR)

  17. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Fly Ash Blocks which earlier fell under entry No.177 of Schedule II of Notification no. 01/2017 dated June 28, 2017 was omitted w.e.f. January 01, 2019 and was inserted in in Entry No.225B of Schedule I of the notification from said date.

    In the matter of M/s Dipakkumar Ramjibhai Patel

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4190 (AAR)

  18. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Since the insertion of entry (viia) and (viii) vide said amendment Notification was being nature of clarification of the GST rate in respect of right to use Intellectual Property and similar products other than IPR, the applicability of said residual entry (viii) would be from the date of Not. No. 11/2017- (Rate) Central Tax & shall attract GST rate of 18% (CGST+SGST) from July, 2017 onwards.

    In the matter of Giriraj Quarry Works

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4189 (AAR)

  19. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    The applicant is not entitled to the benefit of two different Notifications.

    In the matter of Sayaji Industries Ltd.

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4188 (AAR)

  20. AAR · 14 Sep 2020
    Applicant is supplying the goods and services on behalf of other taxable person and shall accordingly be covered under the Sr. No. (vii) of the Section 24.

    In the matter of Patrator

    (2020) TaxCorp(IDT) 4187 (AAR) · Section 24

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.