-
There is no delay on the part of the respondents in making payment of refund since payment of refund has been made after following the guidelines given in Circular No. 94/13/2019-GST dated March 28, 2019.
Afflatus International vs. UOI & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7537 (HC-P&H)
-
Revenue is directed to disburse the assessee’s claim for refund along with interest.
Alex Tour and Travel Private Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner, CGST
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7536 (HC-DELHI)
-
The very purpose of fixing the mandatory pre-deposit is to do away with the procedure of granting stay after hearing, which was delaying the disposal of the appeal earlier.
Mahalaxmi Metal Co. vs. the Assistant Commissioner (ST) & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7529 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Amount deposited by the assessee shall be refunded subject to the outcome of the demand quantified under Section 74 of the Act in accordance with law.
Maa Mahamaya Alloys Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of U.P. & 3 Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7528 (HC-ALLAHABAD)
-
The terms betting and gambling appearing in Entry 6 of Schedule III of the CGST Act does not and cannot include games of skill within its ambit.
Gameskraft Technologies Pvt Ltd vs DGGSTI
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7524 (HC-KARNATAKA)
-
Since at that stage no action was contemplated to inspect the premises of the assessee or to search and seize any goods or books of accounts as contemplated under Section 67 of the Act. As such, no authorization is required by the V&E Department Officer.
Sudhakar Traders vs. The State of Andhra Pradesh
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7520 (HC-AP)
-
A lump sum paid by ITC Ltd. to be paid as bonus to employees of the Canteen Service Provider would be taxable at the same rate as supply of canteen service i.e. 5%.
In the matter of Foodsutra Art Of Spices Pvt. Ltd.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7515 (AAR)
-
If at all the assessing officer is unsatisfied with the attribution adopted by assessee, he is always at liberty to seek more particulars or apply the deeming fiction as per the Notification.
Avigna Properties Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7514 (HC-MADRAS)
-
Provision of accommodation by the Applicant to pilgrims of Temple not within the precincts of temple and not managed by the temple’s trust with a rent of Rs.1000 or more is not exempt but taxable at 12%.
In the matter of Nandini Ashram Trust
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7513 (AAR)
-
In the diary recovered by the Special Investigation Branch, it was noticed that the assessee had received much more advance than it was shown in the returns.
Jalsa Resorts vs. State of U.P.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7507 (HC-CALCUTTA)
-
Further proceedings pursuant to impugned show cause notice shall remain in abeyance.
Surajmal Ramniwas Oil Mill Pvt. Ltd. vs. Joint Commissioner, SGST & Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7506 (HC-RAJASTHAN)
-
Petitioner-firm, shall be entitled to lodge its claim for availment of Input Tax Credit in respect of the period from the cancellation of the registration till the registration is restored.
R.K. Jewelers vs. UOI
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7505 (HC-RAJASTHAN)
-
One more opportunity can be granted to the assessee to produce proof to show that he is a registered government contractor.
Mohammad Sikandar Ali vs Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Siliguri Charge And Ors.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7504 (HC-CALCUTTA)
-
The petitioner must first submit an application as contemplated under the aforesaid Notification, and the concerned must offer reasons to justify rejection of the application, even if it could be rejected.
Varadaraju Ravi Kumar vs. Joint Commissioner of Central Tax
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7503 (HC-KARNATAKA)
-
Non-filing of certified copy of the impugned order within 7 days of filing of appeal u/s 107 of TNGST Act is only a technical defect and merit of the matters in the Appeal should not have been sacrificed for non compliance of a procedural requirement.
PKV Agencies vs The Appellate Deputy Commissioner
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7502 (HC-MADRAS)
-
The requirement to furnish certified copy of the impugned order within seven days of filing of appeal is provided as a procedural requirement.
Atlas PVC Pipes Ltd vs. State of Odisha and others
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7501 (HC-ORISSA)
-
Prima facie the applicant has obtained an Advance Ruling by suppression of this material fact and hence the advance ruling needs to be withdrawn as void ab initio u/s 104 of the CGST Act, 2017.
In the matter of Srico Projects Pvt. Ltd.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7495 (AAR)
-
If the Applicant provides sub-contract of pure services to another contractor of SMC, the supply would not fall within the ambit of Notification and would be leviable to GST.
In the matter of Ajit Babubhai Jariwala
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7494 (AAR)
-
Works contract services to Government Authority taxable at 12%, others 18%
In the matter of Srico Projects Pvt. Ltd.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7493 (AAR)
-
Inter-state supply of Motor vehicles in the form of 7-seater Ambulances to Tripura Govt. attracts 28% IGST under the HSN Code 8703.
In the matter of Raminfo Ltd.
(2023) TaxCorp(IDT) 7489 (AAR)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.