Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,089 rulings

  1. ITAT Bangalore · 11 Oct 2013
    The expenses for putting up new median hoardings has generated income to assessee not only for this concerned assessment year but also for the next three succeeding assessment years. Therefore, there was nothing wrong in the in treating a part of the expenses as capital in nature and granting depreciation on the same.

    ABLE ADVERTISING vs ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2326 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  2. ITAT Ahmedabad · 20 Sep 2013
    Blood bank is not a hospital & not entitled to exemption U/s. 11

    Advance Transfusion- Medicine Research Foundation Vs. The ADIT (Exemption)

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2325 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  3. ITAT Mumbai · 20 Sep 2013
    ITAT not happy with lackluster attempt of Counsels

    Shri Paresh S. Shah Vs. ITO

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2324 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  4. Supreme Court · 19 Nov 2013
    Registration of FIR is mandatory –SC

    Lalita Kumari Versus Govt. of U.P. & Or

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2323 (SC)

  5. Delhi High Court · 18 Nov 2013
    HC ask ICAI to Provide writers for disabled students

    REENA BHATIA Versus THE INSTITUTE OF CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS OF INDIA & ANR.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2322 (HC-DELHI)

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 16 Aug 2013
    ITAT bench upheld the order passed by CIT(A) that the provisions of section 194-I of the Act to deduct TDS on the lease premium paid by the assessee is not attracted. Further uphold CIT(A) to delete the demand raised by the AO u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Act.

    Income-tax Officer -(TDS) vs Navi Mumbai SEZ (P.) Ltd

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2321 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · income tax Section 194I, 201(1), 201(1A)

  7. Karnataka High Court · 19 Sep 2013
    Technical know-how is capital asset for depreciation purposes and sale thereof taxable as capital gain.

    Commissioner of Income Tax vs Wintac Ltd

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2320 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Income Tax Section 48

  8. Supreme Court · 27 Aug 2013
    AO empowered to launch fishing and roving enquiry with a view to detect tax evasion

    Kathiroor Service Cooperative Bank vs CIT(CIB) & Ors

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2319 (SC) · Income tax Section 133(6)

  9. ITAT Bangalore · 31 Oct 2013
    Stock option granted is not a capital asset u/s. 2(14) of the Act.

    ACIT vs Shri Chittaranjan A Dasannacharya

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2318 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax Section 2(14)

  10. ITAT Mumbai · 24 Jul 2013
    Merely writing “approved” in the sanction form without recording satisfaction renders the reopening of assessment void u/s 148

    Shri Amara Bajaj vs ACIT

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2317 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax Section 148

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 28 Oct 2013
    Issuance of notice u/s 148 after approval from Commissioner of Income Tax instead of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax which is authorized to grant approval under the provisions of section 151 held to be non-sustainable in law.

    ITO vs Shri Rupkumar Balchand Rohra

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2316 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax Section 148, 151

  12. Karnataka High Court · 23 Aug 2013
    Goodwill was not covered for depreciation u/s 32 prior to 1997 amendment of the Act. The definition of actual cost under Section 43(1) of the Act cannot be read to cover goodwill as an asset for which the assessee had to pay and which can be termed as actual cost of the assets to the assessee. The Tribunal apportioned the cost of goodwill to various other assets acquired by the assessee thereby increasing the cost of other assets and allowing depreciation thereon, which, in our opinion, is not legally sustainable.

    CIT vs WIPRO LTD

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2315 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Income Tax Section 32, 43(1)

  13. ITAT Delhi · 28 Oct 2013
    Section 251(1)(a) shows that the Commissioner (Appeal) has been empowered by the Statute to either confirm, reduce, enhance or annul the assessment. The power to set aside has been omitted by the Finance Act, 2001 w.e.f 01.06.2001. In instant case, ITAT declined to uphold the CIT (A)'s action in restoring the issue to the AO.

    Viney Krishan Chaudhri vs DCIT

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2314 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax Section 251(1)(a)

  14. Supreme Court · 29 Oct 2013
    Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act- Employer has a right to withhold the gratuity pending departmental inquiry. However, this course of action is available only if disciplinary authority has necessary powers to impose the penalty of dismissal upon the respondent even after his retirement.

    Ch. cum Man. Director Mahanadi Coalfield Ltd. vs Rabindranath Choubey

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2313 (SC) · Section 4(6) of the Payment of Gratuity Act

  15. ITAT Amritsar · 28 Oct 2013
    80IB - Excise Duty refund is to be treated as ‘capital receipt’ and not liable to be taxed.

    ITO vs Sh. Ramesh Chander Gupta

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2312 (ITAT-AMRITSAR) · Income Tax Section 80IB

  16. ITAT Mumbai · 06 Sep 2013
    Disallowance in view of S. 40(a)(ia) cannot be made if the deposits of TDS to the credit of Government are made before the due date of filing the return as described in section 139(1).

    Pratibha JV vs DCIT

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2311 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax Section 139(1), 40(a)(ia)

  17. ITAT Bangalore · 06 Sep 2013
    Where assessee-company received loan from another company and assessee was not a shareholder in said company, deeming provisions of section 2(22)(e) were not applicable to impugned transaction of loan.

    ACIT vs Source Hub India (P) Ltd

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2310 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax Section 2(22)(e)

  18. Karnataka High Court · 16 Sep 2013
    When a retiring partner takes only money towards the value of his share and when there is no distribution of capital asset/assets among the partners there is no transfer of a capital asset and consequently no profits or gains is payable under Section 45(4) of the Income Tax Act.

    CIT vs M/S Dynamic Enterprises

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2309 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Income Tax Section 45(4)

  19. ITAT Mumbai · 30 Oct 2013
    Disallowance of expenditure u/s 14A - Whether the expenditure can be allowed if the income even if earned is not taxable. Upheld Ld. CIT(A) order that under the provisions of section 57(iii) there must be clear nexus between the expenditure incurred and income sought to be earned for allowing the claim of expenditure. CIT(A) did not accept the arguments of the assessee that the transactions were correlated and there was indirect nexus between the interest income and the interest expenditure incurred. The interest expenditure was not allowable as deduction u/s 57(iii) of the IT Act.

    Mrs. Varsha R. Taurani vs ACIT

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2308 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax Section 14A, 57(iii)

  20. Delhi High Court · 07 Nov 2013
    HC Partly Reverses Law On Foreign Companies Interest Liability U/s. 234B

    DIT-I, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION versus ALCATEL LUCENT USA, INC., ALCATEL LUCENT WORLD SERVICES INC.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2307 (HC-DELHI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.