Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,089 rulings

  1. Madras High Court · 04 Oct 2013
    Income received by the assessee by way of sub-lease of a property, collection of maintenance charges, A.C., hire charges etc., has to assessed as income from house property. ITAT had rightly confirmed the AO's assessment in instant case. Further, in all cases of assessment having become time barred under the regular assessment proceedings under Section 143(2) or (3), as the case may be, proceedings under Section 147, are held to be income escaping assessment.

    Rayala Corporation Pvt. Ltd vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2426 (HC-MADRAS)

  2. Supreme Court · 11 Dec 2013
    Superannuation benefit - Removal of Retiral Benefit - No doubt that such of the employees who are otherwise eligible for superannuation benefit are removed from service in terms of clause 6(b) of the Bipartite Settlement shall be entitled to superannuation benefits. This is the only construction which would harmonise the two provisions. It is well settled rule of construction that in case of apparent conflict between the two provisions, they should be so interpreted that the effect is given to both. Hence, we are of the opinion that such of the employees who are otherwise entitled to superannuation benefits under the Regulation if visited with the penalty of removal from service with superannuation benefits shall be entitled for those benefits and such of the employees though visited with the same penalty but are not eligible for superannuation benefits under the Regulation shall not be entitled to that. Accordingly, we hold that the employee’s heirs are entitled to superannuation benefits. The entire amount that the respondent is found entitled to along with interest at the rate of 6% per annum should be disbursed within 6 weeks from the date of receipt/communication of this Order.

    BANK OF BARODA vs S.K. KOOL(D)THROUGH LRS AND ANR

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2425 (SC)

  3. ITAT Ahmedabad · 09 Jul 2010
    S. 40A(2)(b) Interest on unsecured loan from relatives @ 18% is reasonable

    Vipul Y. Mehta Vs. ACIT

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2424 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  4. Gujarat High Court · 11 Nov 2013
    Denial of Registration u/s 12A for mere unsubstantial activities not justified

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SATVARA EDUCATION FOUNDATION

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2423 (HC-GUJARAT)

  5. ITAT Ahmedabad · 15 Nov 2013
    S. 40A(2)(b) Interest on loan @ 12% paid to related party can’t be considered as excessive

    DCIT Vs. M/s.Sarjan Realities Ltd.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2422 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  6. ITAT Ahmedabad · 11 Feb 2011
    S. 40A(2)(b) Loan taken from relatives cannot be compared with bank loan

    ACIT Vs. M/s. Raj Steel Industries

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2421 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  7. Gujarat High Court · 19 Dec 2013
    S. 260A(4) HC can hear appeal on questions other than the questions on which appeal has been admitted CIT Vs. Mastek Ltd. (Supreme Court)

    THE C.I.T. -II AHMEDABAD, GUJARAT VERSUS M/S MASTEK LTD.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2420 (HC-GUJARAT)

  8. ITAT Agra · 01 Nov 2013
    Services in which human intervention is not required are not covered by scope of section 9(1)(vii)

    Metro & Metro Vs. Additional Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2419 (ITAT-AGRA)

  9. ITAT Mumbai · 06 Dec 2013
    Disallowance u/s 14A for the period before AY 2008-09, should be restricted to 2% of dividend income

    Shakuntaladevi Trade & Investments Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The ITO

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2418 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  10. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Aug 2013
    Ratio decidendi of a judgment prevails upo the contrary obiter dicta of another judgment

    The Asstt.Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. M/s. Rishti Stock and Shares Pvt.Ltd.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2417 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  11. ITAT Hyderabad · 28 Jun 2013
    Leasehold Rights Are Eligible For Depreciation

    M/s Tirumala Music Centre (P) Ltd Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2416 (ITAT-HYDERABAD)

  12. Calcutta High Court · 03 Apr 2013
    SB verdict in Merilyn Shipping on S. 40(a)(ia) tds disallowance is not good law

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA-XI Versus CRESCENT EXPORT SYNDICATE

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2415 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  13. ITAT Mumbai · 28 Feb 2013
    Liability Paid subsequently cannot be added to the income of the Assessee

    Mr. Yusuf R Tanwar Vs. ITO

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2414 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  14. ITAT Delhi · 13 Dec 2013
    Assessment completed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) was invalid

    Shri Mohinder Kumar Chhabra Vs. Income Tax Officer

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2413 (ITAT-DELHI)

  15. ITAT Delhi · 13 Dec 2013
    Reopening on the basis of vague / uncertain information on Accommodation Entry not valid

    Income Tax Officer Vs. Mrs. Maya Gupta

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2412 (ITAT-DELHI)

  16. ITAT Delhi · 13 Dec 2013
    Non-furnishing of balance sheet cannot lead to presumption that there was no cash in hand

    Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shri Manish Kumar Aggarwal

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2411 (ITAT-DELHI)

  17. ITAT Mumbai · 11 Dec 2013
    Unclaimed liabilities Assessable As Income Despite No Write-Back on failure to prove genuineness

    Income Tax Department Vs. Shri Shailesh D. Shah

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2410 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  18. Allahabad High Court · 13 Dec 2013
    S. 271D No Penalty for acknowledging the debt in books, if there was no cash receipt by the Assessee

    Commissioner Of Income Tax-II Kanpur Versus M/S Sher Cot Leather Craft Ltd. Kanpur

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2409 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  19. Delhi High Court · 15 Jan 2013
    No Disallowance u/s. 14A For Investment in shares made Out Of Commercial Expediency

    CIT versus Oriental Structural Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2408 (HC-DELHI)

  20. Supreme Court · 16 Dec 2013
    In case of Joint account only drawer of cheque liable for prosecution U/s. of N.I. Act : SC

    Mrs. Aparna A. Shah Versus M/s Sheth Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

    (2013) TaxCorp(LJ) 2407 (SC)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.