Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,089 rulings

  1. ITAT Ahmedabad · 04 Apr 2014
    The term “month” in s. 54E, 54EA, 54EB & 54EC does not mean “30 days” but the “calendar month”. So, the expression “within a month” means “before the end of the calendar month”

    Alkaben B. Patel vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3182 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  2. Delhi High Court · 08 Apr 2014
    S. 226: AO warned of contempt action for seeking to overreach ITAT’s stay order

    A. T. Kearney India Pvt. Ltd vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3181 (HC-DELHI) · S. 226

  3. Gujarat High Court · 09 Apr 2014
    S. 80-IB(10): If developer does not (without just cause) develop to full extent of FSI, a part of the sale proceeds has to treated as being for sale of FSI and denied s. 80-IB(10) deduction

    CIT vs. Moon Star Developers

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3180 (HC-GUJARAT)

  4. ITAT Chennai · 09 Apr 2014
    Sale of land registered in lesser value by Vendee to reduce of registration charges, balance paid in cash cannot be treated as unexplained cash credit in the hands of vendor, when personal transactions and personal conducts, a plausible explanation is always an evidence, when supported by preponderance of probability.

    Shri R Anantha Padmanaban vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2763 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  5. ITAT Mumbai · 16 Apr 2014
    S. 148 r.w.s 150(1) - Reopening of the assessment beyond six years, in order to give effect to any ‘finding or direction’ of the appellate authority. The observation of the Tribunal that ‘the case of the assessee is to be brought to tax for A.Y 2000-01, does not require compliance by the authorities below so far as the assessment year 2000-01 is concerned, taking recourse to section 150 of the Act by holding the same as ‘finding’ of the Tribunal is not legally tenable.

    Shri Anil Suri vs ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2762 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 148 r.w.s 150(1)

  6. Rajasthan High Court · 15 Apr 2014
    S. 234E: High Court issues notice on challenge to notices for levy of fee for failure to file TDS statement. Recovery of fee is subject to outcome of Petition

    OM PRAKASH DHOOT & ORS vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2761 (HC-RAJASTHAN) · Section 234E

  7. ITAT Mumbai · 11 Apr 2014
    Service tax paid on gross fees receivable, unrecovered from clients is allowable. Service tax already formed part of income and only the unrealized amount has been written–off, which has to be allowed as deduction, while computing the income from profession u/s 28.

    S M Kapoor & Co and Mehra Khanna & Co vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2760 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  8. ITAT Amritsar · 19 Aug 2013
    Capital Gain - JDA- Consideration accrued is also relevant, to be taxed once transfer of the capital asset takes place. Court injunction cannot be said not willing to perform its obligation. Assessee’s plea that the possession was to be given only at the time of registration of the JDA, is not correct. Once irrevocable power was given then it cannot be said that the possession was not given.

    Shri Satnam Singh Kainth Ex-MP vs vs Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2759 (ITAT-AMRITSAR)

  9. ITAT Delhi · 11 Apr 2014
    Determining the NRI status – Exceeding 182 days due to illegal impounding of passport - over stay caused by such untenable restriction of movement out of India should be excluded while calculating the no. of days of stay in India.

    Shri Suresh Nanda vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2758 (ITAT-DELHI)

  10. ITAT Panaji · 04 Apr 2014
    S. 2(47) - Capital Gain – Date of Transfer - Wherever a Rectification Deed is executed, it rectifies the original transaction and is applicable from the date when the original transaction took place. The Sale Deed in this case was originally executed and registered on 4.7.2008. Therefore, the transfer of the land has taken place during the A.Y 2009 -10.

    Income-tax Officer vs Smt. Myra Muriel Paul

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2757 (ITAT-PANAJI) · Section 2(47)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 07 Apr 2014
    S. 40(a)(ia) - Prospectively or Retrospectively - Voluntarily offered - Tax deducted from labour charges u/s 194C - Tax paid before the due date

    Shri Vijay G. Mandave vs Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2756 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · 40(a)(ia)

  12. ITAT Cochin · 07 Apr 2014
    Violation of the provisions u/s 13(1)(c) - Trust uses its income for construction of building on the land belonging to one of the trustees amounts to applying the income of the trust for the benefit of the trustee which is certainly falls under section 13(1)(c) of the Act.

    Assistant Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs Natya Sankalpaa

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2755 (ITAT-COCHIN) · 13(1)(c)

  13. Gujarat High Court · 31 Mar 2014
    Section 14A would have no applicability in relation to deductions to be made while computing total income under Chapter IV

    CIT vs BANASKANTHA DIST.CO.OP. MILK PRODUCERS' UNION LTD

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2754 (HC-GUJARAT) · 14A

  14. Bombay High Court · 25 Mar 2014
    Write-off of irrecoverable advances is not a “transfer” and the loss cannot be claimed as a capital loss u/s 45

    Crompton Greaves Limited vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2753 (HC-BOMBAY)

  15. ITAT Cochin · 28 Mar 2014
    The usage of the land by the purchaser not relevant factor to find whether the land is agricultural land or not?

    JCIT vs Cochin Malabar Estates & Industries Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2752 (ITAT-COCHIN)

  16. Karnataka High Court · 24 Mar 2014
    Chapter XIV-B do not preclude AO to proceed against assessee by issuing notice u/s 148

    Gudwill Housing Limited vs ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2751 (HC-KARNATAKA) · 158BD

  17. AP High Court · 22 Jan 2014
    Application of fund for construction of the building, is not the charitable activity.

    Kamma Sangham vs The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2750 (HC-AP)

  18. Allahabad High Court · 13 Mar 2014
    No disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) as 'securities' stood excluded from the definition of "brokerage or commission" under Section 194-H. Hon`ble high court rejects submission of the revenue to adopt a restrictive interpretation because unless this were done, would exclude a large number of transactions from the ambit of Section 194-H where 'commission or brokerage' is paid in relation to any transaction relating to securities.

    CIT vs Tandon & Mahendra

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2749 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · 40(a)(ia)

  19. Gujarat High Court · 11 Mar 2014
    S. 80-IB(10): If developer does not (without just cause) develop to full extent of FSI, a part of the sale proceeds has to treated as being for sale of FSI and denied s. 80-IB(10) deduction

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I vs MOON STAR DEVELPERS

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2748 (HC-GUJARAT) · 80IB(10)

  20. Gujarat High Court · 25 Mar 2014
    The effect of s. 80IA(9) is that s. 80-IA deduction has to be reduced for s. 80HHC deduction in all cases and not only when the combined deduction exceeds the profits

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs ATUL INTERMEDIATES

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2747 (HC-GUJARAT) · 80IA(9), 80HHC

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.