Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,074 rulings

  1. Delhi High Court · 23 May 2014
    Due to generation of incidental surplus by educational institution – exemption u/s 10(23C) will not be denied.

    Council For The Indian School, Certificate Examinations Vs. Director General of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3392 (HC-DELHI)

  2. Madras High Court · 16 Apr 2014
    Provisions of S. 2(22)(e) shall not apply to sum advanced to shareholder in ordinary course of business

    Commissioner of Income Tax vs Shri Madurai Chettiyar Karthikeyan

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3391 (HC-MADRAS)

  3. Calcutta High Court · 12 Mar 2014
    S. 73(1), assessee bieng a share broker is entitled to set off loss incurred in transactions of derivatives and day trading of shares against its profits and gains from purchase and sale of shares on delivery basis

    CIT vs Baljit Securities (P.) Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3390 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  4. Allahabad High Court · 10 Jun 2014
    High Court’s order on complaint of contempt by Judicial Member of ITAT against CA reveals sorry state of inter-se in-fighting between Hon’ble Members of the ITAT and members of the Bar

    State of U. P. vs. S. K. Garg

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3389 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  5. ITAT Agra · 06 Jun 2014
    If no additions made on grounds of reassessment, than no addition can be made on other aspects

    Rajeev Kumar Goyal Vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3388 (ITAT-AGRA)

  6. ITAT Agra · 04 Jun 2014
    Charity from loan taken is Not a valid reason for denying sec 12AA registration

    Neesu Human Resource & Welfare Society. Vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3387 (ITAT-AGRA) · Section 12AA

  7. ITAT Hyderabad · 02 Apr 2014
    Section 54F relief remains despite commercial use of residential house

    N. Revathi Vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3386 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 54F

  8. Allahabad High Court · 21 Oct 2013
    Interest Us/ 234B & 234C payable on failure to pay advance tax in respect of tax payable u/s 115JA/115JB

    Ginni Filaments Ltd. Vs. CIT.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3385 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Sections. 234B, 234C, 115JA, 115JB

  9. ITAT Delhi · 09 Jun 2014
    S. 271(1)(c): Fact that assessee has huge carry forward losses and depreciation and filed a nil return suggests that there is no motive or incentive to make a bogus claim in the return

    Toscana Lasts Limited vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3384 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 271(1)(c)

  10. ITAT Agra · 09 Jun 2014
    S. 153(3) Expl 3/ 267: Benefit of extended period of limitation to pass assessment order pursuant to finding/ direction of appellate authority not available if affected party not heard

    Gaurav Luthara vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3383 (ITAT-AGRA) · Section 153(3)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 27 Mar 2014
    Assessee must be allowed TDS credit based on TDS certificate even if same is not reflected in 26AS

    LSG Sky Chef (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3382 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  12. Delhi High Court · 16 May 2014
    Transfer of loan through journal entry is not violation of sec 269

    ITO Vs. Sh. Dinesh Jain

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3381 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 269

  13. Delhi High Court · 24 Feb 2014
    A.O Zeal to protect interest of revenue has to be tempered with rules of fair play

    Addl. Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr. Vs. Sony Mobile Communications (India) Pvt.Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3380 (HC-DELHI)

  14. AP High Court · 02 Apr 2014
    HC upheld ITAT ruling reported in (2013) 7 TaxCorp (A.T.) 33465 (HYDERABAD). Tribunal has taken note of the Central Government notification and applied the definition as mentioned in clause (a) of Section 2(14)(iii) of the Act and found that the subject land is an agricultural land and it is not put to use for non-agricultural purpose. The fact finding of the learned Tribunal cannot be upset, unless it is perverse and there is no allegation of perversity in the matter.

    Commissioner of Income Tax vs Kapil Chit Funds Pvt.Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3379 (HC-AP)

  15. Allahabad High Court · 06 May 2014
    Assessee cannot be denied credit for TDS on the ground of Form 26AS mismatch because he is not at fault. Non-grant of TDS credit causes harassment, inconvenience & makes the assessee feel cheated. Dept to pay interest + costs of Rs. 25,000

    Rakesh Kumar Gupta vs Union of India and another

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3378 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  16. AP High Court · 09 Apr 2014
    Mere accrual of the consideration, to be received in the subsequent years does not defer the taxability of the capital gains.

    Potla Nageswara Rao vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3377 (HC-AP)

  17. Allahabad High Court · 26 May 2014
    S. 271(1)(c) - No specific direction to levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in assessment order

    Commissioner Of Income Tax vs Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3376 (HC-ALLAHABAD)

  18. ITAT Delhi · 19 May 2014
    Penalty applicable on MAT income. Addition resulted an increase in the income computed u/s 115JA as well. ITAT bench applied the proposition laid down in Nalwa Sons and held that, the penalty would be very much attracted where the addition leading to the concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars affect the computation of income under this Chapter as well.

    DCIT Vs. Jubliant Enpro Pvt Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3375 (ITAT-DELHI)

  19. Bombay High Court · 06 May 2014
    S. 254: If a legal issue is raised (even for the first time) ITAT has the duty to deal with it and cannot remand it to lower authorities

    Kansai Nerolac Paints Ltd vs DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3374 (HC-BOMBAY)

  20. ITAT Mumbai · 21 Aug 2013
    Sales promotion expenses by Pharmaceutical company – Free samples distributed to doctors / physician. ITAT bench, held that assessee claim not genuine, volume of transactions not good reason for failure. Burden on assessee to prove that expenditure incurred wholly and exclusively for purpose of business. Further no disallowance made in earlier years not ground to seek relief in subsequent year. ITAT bench remanded for examination afresh.

    Merck Ltd. vs Deputy CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3373 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.