-
A.O should refrain from adopting double standards of accepting in remand proceedings yet challenging it at appellate forum
ACIT Vs. Praveen Kumar
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3492 (ITAT-AGRA)
-
Section 234E – Odisha High Court Stays Recovery Proceeding
Partha Sarathi Das Vs. UOI & Ors.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3491 (HC-ORISSA) · Section 234E
-
Whether registration u/s 12A can be denied without recording the reasons for satisfaction that the activities of assessee are not genuine or are not being carried out in accordance with the objects of the trust or the institution.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANOTHER Vs. SISTERS OF OUR LADY OF PROVIDENCE EDUCATION SOCIETY
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3490 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 2(15), 10(23C)(vi), 11, 12AA(3), 13
-
Whether in a case where the allegation is that the transaction has been undervalued, the Assessing Officer can rely on other material which establishes that the values recorded in the document are not correct.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. NARINDER KR BUDHIRAJA
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3489 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax – Sections 69B, 131
-
Whether the AO can disallow the said amount and proceed to issue notice u/s 271 and impose penalty in that regard.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. GLOBAL ASSOCIATES
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3488 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Section 271(1)(c)
-
Whether if there is no failure on part of the assessee to disclose truly and fully all the material facts, its assessment can still be re-opened beyond the period of four years from the end of relevant assessment year.
CHAROTAR NAGRIK SAHAKARI BANK LTD. Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3487 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 143(3), 147, 148
-
Whether in case the reassessment proceedings are initiated merely and solely at the instance of the audit party and there was no independent application of mind by the AO with respect to subjective satisfaction for initiation of the reassessment proceedings, the impugned notices can be sustained.
B NANJI CONSTRUCTION PVT LTD. Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3486 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 143(3), 147, 148, 153A(1)(b)
-
Whether when the assessment was made for the first time u/s. 147 read with section 143(3) of the Act, the said assessment is a regular assessment attracting the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 234B.
LAXMI PUBLICATION PVT LTD. VS. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3485 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 133A, 143(1), 143(3), 147, 148, 234B(1), 245D(iv)
-
Whether such provision can be invoked only when the assessee has a liability to pay the tax and he has not paid the same.
ALLAHABAD BANK Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS AND SURVEY
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3484 (ITAT-AGRA) · Income Tax - Sections 191, 194A, 201, 201(1), 201(1A), 271C
-
Whether goodwill falls in 'any other business or commercial right of similar nature' - Whether depreciation is available on such intangible asset.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. INTERTEK INDIA PVT LTD.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3483 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 32, 32(1)
-
Whether disallowance is called for on account of interest expenditure when the assessee's own fund is sufficient to source the investment in question and the interest received by the assessee is more than the interest paid during the year.
M/s ITI SECURITIES LTD, FORMERLY KNOWN AS M/S INTIME SPECTRUM SECURITIES LTD. Vs. ASSTT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4(2), ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4(2)
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3482 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 14A, 37(1), 40(a)(ib), 88E
-
Whether additions can be made on account of unaccounted income when no adverse material has been brought on record by the AO.
M/s SHRI ARBUDA JEWELLERS Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3481 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 68, 133A
-
Whether when the Assessing Officer has clearly demonstrated that the cash was deposited in their accounts which had its source from the assessee as he had benefitted by the said deposit of cash, in that case adverse inference has to be drawn against the assessee.
TULIP ENGINEERING PVT LTD. Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3480 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 133(6), 143(1), 148
-
Whether the statement recorded u/s 132(4) had evidentiary value since the same is made voluntarily without any threat or coercion.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Vs. AGEW STEEL MANUFACTURING PVT LTD.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3479 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 132(4), 133A, 260A
-
Whether the Tribunal is justified in law in holding that 8% premium on the licences purchased by it from outside parties for sale or import would be liable to be treated as cash assistance u/s. 28(iiib) against its export eligible to deduction u/s. 80HHC? Whether cut and polished diamonds shall qualify for deduction u/s 80HHC.
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. AMI DIAMONDS EXPORTERS
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3478 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 28(iiib), 80HHC
-
Whether it will serve much purpose in making a reference to the Valuation Officer u/s 55A, when the date of valuation of a property was 30 years old
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-17 Vs. SHANTILAL J SHAH
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3477 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Section 55A
-
Whether a property is purchased for personal use of the President of the assessee society, when the sale consideration and stamp duty was paid from the funds of the Society and the sale deed was also entered in the representative capacity as President.
MARSHALL SCHOOL SOCIETY Vs. CHAIRMAN CBDT, DEHI AND ANOTHER, THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND OTHERS
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3476 (HC-UTTARAKHAND) · Income Tax - Section 10 (23C)(vi)
-
Whether the Department needs to consider the representation of the assessee , before passing the final orders on merit.
M/s SRI DURGA CONSTRUCTIONS Vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3475 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax - Sections 221(1), 226(3)
-
Whether any substantial question of law arises when the Tribunal allows bond registration charges as per the provisions of Sec 37(1).
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 Vs. M/s HINDUSTAN ORGANICS CHEMICALS LTD.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3474 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections - 36(i)(va), 37(1), 43B, 143(3)
-
Whether the order passed on the objections raised by the assessee would prevent the assessing officer from exercising his power on merits while passing the assessment order.
KALANITHI MARAN, KAVERY KALANITHI Vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3473 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax – Sections 143(3), 147.
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.