Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,074 rulings

  1. ITAT Delhi · 23 Jul 2014
    S. 68: Primary burden is on AO to show that share application money is assessable as unexplained cash credit. AO cannot sit back with folded hands & simply reject assessee’s evidences

    Mithila Credit Services Ltd vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3532 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 68

  2. ITAT Delhi · 18 Jul 2014
    The TPO held that foreign exchange loss was required to be considered as part of operating cost.

    WESTFALIA SEPARATOR INDIA PVT LTD. Vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3531 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 68, 92CA(3), 154

  3. Delhi High Court · 09 Jul 2014
    A final assessment order was made on 29.07.2011 and the assessee’s income was computed at Rs. 2,68,74,62,560/-.

    PGS GEOPHYSICAL AS Vs. ADDL. DIT.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3530 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 9(1)(vii), 44BB, 44DA, 115A, 143, 197, 293A

  4. ITAT Panaji · 18 Jul 2014
    The assessee had claimed expenditure over payment of demurrage made u/s 40(a)(ia) r/w/s 195(1) in respect of iron ore to buyers outside India and also to the resident exporters u/s 40(a)(ia) r/w/s 194C, which was disallowed by the AO. The CIT(A) however, deleted such disallowance.

    SESA GOA LTD. Vs. ADDL. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3529 (ITAT-PANAJI) · Income tax - Sections 14A, 40(a)(ia), 194C, 195(1)

  5. ITAT Panaji · 18 Jul 2014
    The Assessee with its letter, made detailed submission challenging the validity of the issuance of such show cause notice.

    SESA GOA LTD. Vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3528 (ITAT-PANAJI) · Income Tax - Sections 2(29BA), 10B, 32(1)(iia), 92CA, 143(1), 263

  6. ITAT Jaipur · 11 Jul 2014
    It was further observed that ALP had been determined by using CUP Method i.e. com pared against a single price and not against multiple prices, the benefit of 5% Bond was not available to the assessee as had been held in the case of M/s. Perot Systems TSI (India) Ltd. vs. DCIT. The AO had called for objections against the draft order passed.

    GLAMOUR ENTERPRISES PVT LTD. Vs DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3527 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · Income tax - Sections 92CA(3), 92E, 144C(5) & (13)

  7. ITAT Mumbai · 18 Jul 2014
    Accordingly, the TPO adjusted Rs.90,71,754/- in respect of the lease rentals paid by the assessee.

    BOSKALIS INTERNATIONAL DREDGING INTERNATIONAL Vs. DDIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3526 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Section 92C

  8. ITAT Mumbai · 18 Jul 2014
    Alternatively the AO held that even if the revenue was considered as business profits, it is still taxable in India because its Indian subsidiary, Reuters India, constituted an agency PE of the assessee as well as the assessee was having equipment in India which constituted a fixed base PE.

    REUTERS TRANSACTION SERVICES LTD. Vs DDIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3525 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 5(4), 9(1)(vi), 44D, 115A, 144C(3), (5) & (13), 234B

  9. ITAT Hyderabad · 18 Jul 2014
    In this appeal, assessee has raised various grounds. One on the issue of T.P. adjustments made. Another was on levy of interest under section 234B which was statutory in nature. Lastly was the initiation of penalty proceedings.

    KIRBY BUILDING SYSTEMS INDIA LTD. Vs ADDL. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3524 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 37(1), 43B, 92CA, 143(3), 144C, 234B, 234D, 271(1)(c)

  10. ITAT Delhi · 18 Jul 2014
    The sole issue was the inclusion of such expenditure as a part of the taxable income of the assessee. On appeal, the CIT(A), excluded such expenditure from the gross receipts. Hence, the present appeal.

    ADIT. Vs. SMITH INTERNATIONAL INC.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3523 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Section 44BB

  11. ITAT Delhi · 17 Jul 2014
    In reaching this prima facie belief, the AO relied on the amendment made to section 44DA through the Finance Bill, 2010. The draft assessment order was passed.

    CGG MARINE SAS Vs. ADIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3522 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 9(1)(vii), 44BB(1), 44D, 44DA, 115A, 143(2) & (3), 144C(13), 147, 148

  12. Gujarat High Court · 01 May 2014
    VCES application rejection for Delay or Short Payment of taxes valid – HC

    Ramilaben Bharatbhai Patel v. Union of India

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3521 (HC-GUJARAT)

  13. ITAT Delhi · 11 Jul 2014
    Rebate of STT paid u/s 88E available against tax calculated u/s 115JB

    DCIT. Vs. M/s Credential Stock Brokers Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3520 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections. 88E, 115JB

  14. Bombay High Court · 17 Jul 2014
    Whether inland haulage charges are also eligible for tax treaty benefits under Article 8 of the DTAA.

    DIT Vs M/s SAFMARINE CONTAINER LINES NV.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3519 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income tax - Sections 44B

  15. ITAT Delhi · 04 Jul 2014
    AO cannot object submission of additional evidence if same is accepted by CIT(A)

    ITO. Vs. Karan Mehra

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3518 (ITAT-DELHI)

  16. ITAT Delhi · 04 Jul 2014
    Penalty not leviable on issue on which a substantial question of law has been framed by HC

    JHPL Holding (P) Ltd. Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3517 (ITAT-DELHI)

  17. ITAT Chennai · 06 Jan 2014
    Trust Eligible for Relief u/s in respect of income from pharmacy run by it with in its hospital premises

    Franciscan Sisters of St. Joseph Society Vs. JCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3516 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  18. Bombay High Court · 22 Jul 2014
    Loss on account of depreciation in value of securities held as stock is not notional & is allowable as a deduction

    CIT vs. HDFC Bank Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3515 (HC-BOMBAY)

  19. Allahabad High Court · 03 Jul 2014
    Whether in the event of closure of a firm, stock of the said firm would be carry forward to the newly formed company, at cost only.

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/s MOTILAL DULI CHAND

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3514 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 254(2), 260

  20. Gujarat High Court · 08 Jul 2014
    Whether the order passed by Tribunal will give rise to any question of law, in case it has relied upon its own decision in the case of very assessee on similar facts, in the previous AYs.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. SAKAR CORPORATION

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3513 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Section 80IB

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.