Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,074 rulings

  1. Madras High Court · 14 Jul 2014
    Whether in case an assessee, under compelling circumstances, had accepted cash loan no penalty need be levied by invoking the provisions of Section 273-B.

    DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (E) Vs. M/s YOUNG MEN CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3632 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax - Sections 68, 269SS, 269T, 271D, 271E, 273B

  2. Gujarat High Court · 10 Jul 2014
    Whether the said income would be considered as arising from banking business, and therefore, liable for exemption u/s 80P

    PRIME CO-OP BANK LTD. Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER AND 1

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3631 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 80P, 264

  3. Gujarat High Court · 21 Jul 2014
    Whether when the Tribunal has recorded that the assessee did furnish all the information required by the AO, in such a case, initiating reassessment after four years is sustainable in law.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Vs. ASIAN TUBES LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3630 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income tax - Sections 143(3), 147, 148

  4. ITAT Mumbai · 04 Jul 2014
    Whether in order to claim deduction u/s 36, in addition to writing off in Profit & Loss account, an assessee has to prove its authenticity also.

    UHDE INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. ADDL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3629 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax – Sections 143(3), 154, 234B, 254(1)

  5. ITAT Hyderabad · 21 Mar 2014
    Whether the alternative claim for deduction u/s 10A can be disallowed on the mere non- submission of accountant's report u/s 10A(5), when such claim was yet to be duly verified by the Department.

    M/s WISSEN INFOTECH PVT LTD. Vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(2)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3628 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 10A(5), 10A & B, 143(3)

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 31 Jul 2014
    Whereas, the Tribunal confirmed that no deduction for depreciation allowance or other administrative expenditure should be allowed.

    ROLTA HOLDING AND FINANCE CORPORATION LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3627 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 24(a), 254(1) & (2)

  7. ITAT Bangalore · 31 Jul 2014
    The assessee, later dropped proceedings in respect of fringe benefit tax and interest claimed under section 36(1)(iii). The assessee challenged only three out of four issues in this appeal.

    SOBHA DEVELOPERS LTD. Vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3626 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Income Tax - Sections 36(1)(iii), 40(a)(ia), 80IB(10), 143(1), 263

  8. Delhi High Court · 22 Nov 2013
    HC grants exemption U/s. 54F on construction of new house after demolishing of old one

    CIT. Vs. Ashok Kumar Ralhan

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3625 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 54F

  9. ITAT Delhi · 25 Jul 2014
    ITAT deletes Addition for unexplained cash credit in the form of Share Capital & Share Premium

    ACIT. Vs. M/s Bahubali Dyes Limited

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3624 (ITAT-DELHI)

  10. ITAT Delhi · 25 Jul 2014
    For imposition of Penalty U/s. 271(1)(c) in Assessment U/s. 153A, original return of income filed u/s 139 cannot be considered

    Pawan Kumar Gupta Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3623 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections. 271(1)(c), 153A, 139

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 31 Jul 2014
    Whether initiation of re-assessment proceedings can be valid in law when the AO has not attributed any failure on the part of the assessee

    DIVERSEY INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3622 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Sections 43B, 143(3), 147, 148

  12. Bombay High Court · 31 Jul 2014
    Whether, for the purpose of Sec 37(2A) relating to refreshment expenses incurred on employees at work, a hotel can be a place of work

    SANDVIK ASIA LTD. Vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3621 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections 37(2A), 80V, 256(1)

  13. AP High Court · 02 Jul 2014
    Whether in case debtors have considered themselves as unable to pay their debts, the provisions of section 41(1) would still apply.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. M/s SRI KAMAKSHI FOODS PRODUCTS PVT LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3620 (HC-AP) · Income Tax - Sections 41(1), 271(1)(c)

  14. AP High Court · 10 Jun 2014
    Whether a lessee can be treated as the owner of the leased property where the individual remained as owner of the property for a fairly long period and the lessee was conferred with the right to sublease the property or to do certain activities, depending on the terms of agreement between the parties.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AP-I Vs. SMT S PREMALATHA

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3619 (HC-AP) · Income Tax – Section 32(1A)

  15. Allahabad High Court · 18 Jul 2014
    Whether if the Tribunal applied its mind and thereafter, passed the order after considering the submissions of the parties, it can be said that the order passed has no legs to stand on.

    SHYAM BIDI WORKS Vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3618 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 143(3), 145(2)

  16. Bombay High Court · 10 Jul 2014
    Whether expenses incurred in foreign currency on telecommunication charges and providing technical services outside India should be excluded from the total turnover for the purpose of computation of deduction u/s 10A.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 Vs. TECH MAHINDRA LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3617 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Section 10A

  17. Gujarat High Court · 15 Jul 2014
    Whether on request of the assessee, matter can be remitted to the AO to consider the exact unutilized FSI and exact calculation with respect to the unutilized FSI where the finding recorded by the AO with respect to the total permissible FSI available for construction; the FSI utilized by the assessee and the FSI unutilized by the assessee was on appreciation of evidence and the same was never disputed by the assessee.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I Vs. DESAI DEVELOPERS

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3616 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax – Sections 40a(ia), 80IB(10)

  18. Gujarat High Court · 18 Jul 2014
    Whether assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80IA where while claiming deduction under Section 80HHC, the assessee itself claimed that Central Excise Duty set off is export incentive by way of duty drawback.

    ADCI DYE CHEM P LTD. Vs. DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3615 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 80IA, 80HHC

  19. Gujarat High Court · 14 Jul 2014
    Whether in case the AO has not at all considered these aspects and not complied with the directions of the ITAT while giving effect to their order, said order has to be remanded again.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. DHANANI CYCLE VALVE

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3614 (HC-GUJARAT)

  20. Gujarat High Court · 23 Jun 2014
    Whether in case the issue of allowance of deduction u/s 80HHC is a debatable one on which two opinions are possible, its allowance could amount to concealment of income. Whether in such a case penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Vs. MADHUSUDAN INDUSTRIES LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3613 (HC-GUJARAT) · Income Tax - Sections 80HHC, 271(1)(c)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.