Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,068 rulings

  1. ITAT Chandigarh · 07 Aug 2014
    Whether interest earned on account of loan and advances made to a joint venture company could be claimed as deduction.

    DSM ANTI INFECTIVES INDIA LTD. Vs. Addl. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3994 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH) · Income tax – Sections 14A, 36(i)(iii), 37, 80HHC, 92C, 143(3), 144C(1), 234A, 234B, 234C, 271(1)(c)

  2. Madras High Court · 06 Aug 2014
    Whether before determining the nature of expenditure incurred towards modernization and replacement of machinery, the impact of such replaced materials on the productivity has to be assessed

    CIT. Vs. PRABHU SPINNING MILLS PVT LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3993 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax – Sections 31, 37

  3. Allahabad High Court · 11 Aug 2014
    Whether TDS u/s 194-C is to be deducted on vehicle hire charges taken for fixed tenure and exclusive usage by the assessee

    CIT. Vs. FRESSSCALE SEMICONDUCTOR INDIA PVT. LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3992 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 43(3), 194C, 194I, 260A

  4. ITAT Pune · 20 Aug 2014
    Whether the assessee can claim award of cost against judicial/quasi judicial orders

    PARKAR MEDICAL FOUNDATION Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3991 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income Tax - Sections 11, 13(1)(c), 143(1), 143(3), 148, 254(2B), 263

  5. ITAT Mumbai · 20 Aug 2014
    Whether the amendment made vide Finance Act, 2010 in Sec 40(a)(ia) providing for non-disallowance if the TDS is paid before the due date for filing of return u/s 139(1), is retrospective in nature

    INDO STOSEC PVT LTD. Vs.ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3990 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income tax – Sections 10(38), 40(a)(ia), 111A, 115JB, 139(1)

  6. ITAT Delhi · 12 Aug 2014
    Whether sales tax concessions offered by the State in lieu of setting up manufacturing facility in a notified backward area are necessarily capital receipt.

    JOHNSON MATTHEY INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. Addl. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3989 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 28 (iv), 234B, 234D, 250

  7. ITAT Panaji · 14 Aug 2014
    Whether there is any prohibition u/s 80P not to allow deduction to such co-operative societies in respect of business relating to its members

    ITO. Vs. GOKAK VIVIDH UDDESHAGALA SOUHARD SAHAKARI NIYAMIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3988 (ITAT-PANAJI) · Income Tax - Sections 80P(2)(a)(i), 80P(4)

  8. Gujarat High Court · 11 Aug 2014
    No absolute right of an Advocate to have appearance in any Court – Gujarat HC

    Vasava Narpat Sinh, (Advocate) & Anr Vs. Registrar Gujarat High Court & Ors.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3987 (HC-GUJARAT)

  9. Cic · 31 Jul 2014
    DC of Customs threatens CIC judges

    Shri P. Balachandar Vs. The Dy. Commissioner (Enquiry) (Central Information Commission)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3986 (CIC)

  10. Delhi High Court · 13 Aug 2014
    CAG’s Appointment – Delhi High Court Judgment

    N GOPALASWAMI & ORS Vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3985 (HC-DELHI)

  11. ITAT Delhi · 14 Aug 2014
    Whether assessee is required to prove direct nexus between the AMP expenditure and credit notes

    M/s MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT LTD. Vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3984 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income tax - Sections 10A, 10B, 92C(3), 92CA(1) & (2), 92D, 234D, 271(1)(c)

  12. Bombay High Court · 13 Aug 2014
    Whether when the assessee company takes over the industrial unit of its non-resident parent under an scheme of amalgamation, it is entitled to claim depreciation on the written down value of the fixed assets of the unit taken over by the assessee

    RHONE-POULENC INDIA LTD. Vs CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3983 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections 32, 34, 43, 256(1)

  13. Delhi High Court · 12 Aug 2014
    Whether in case the amount has been invested by the assessee for purchase of the property, however, the legal title in the said property was not transferred to the assessee within a period of two years from the date of sale of the first property, exemption u/s 54 would be denied.

    CIT. Vs. KULDEEP SINGH

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3982 (HC-DELHI) · Income Tax - Section 54

  14. Madras High Court · 05 Aug 2014
    Whether when royalty is paid towards licence fee for manufacture and sale of products using the technical knowhow supplied by the foreign company, it is to be construed as revenue expenditure

    CIT. Vs. HITECH ARAI LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3981 (HC-MADRAS) · Income Tax - Sections 9(vii), 35AB, 37, 80HHC, 143

  15. Allahabad High Court · 11 Aug 2014
    Whether TDS obligation arises u/s 194-I or 194C in this case - 194C, rules ITAT

    CIT (TDS) Vs. U.P.S.R.T.C.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3980 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax – Sections 43(3), 194C, 194I, CBDT Circular no 681 of 1994

  16. Allahabad High Court · 11 Aug 2014
    Whether When the contract between the assessee and the contractor is for providing pick up and drop facilities to the employees of the assessee company, it attracts provisions of Sec 194I

    CIT. (TDS) Vs. M/s BHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3979 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Income Tax - Sections 194C, 194I, 201(1A), 260

  17. Bombay High Court · 12 Aug 2014
    Whether an exporter is eligible to claim deduction u/s 80HHC for deemed credit under CENVAT Incentive Scheme

    CIT Vs M/s VALIANT GLASS WORKS PVT. LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3978 (HC-BOMBAY) · Income Tax - Sections 28(iiia), 28(iiic), 80HHC, 143(3), 260A

  18. ITAT Mumbai · 13 Aug 2014
    Whether when the Director of the assessee company buys and sells the property to the company at a price and later to improve the cash position of the company the assessee sells back the same to the Director at a loss, such a transaction is to be construed as a profit-reducing device.

    KANAKLAXMI INVESTMENT PVT. LTD. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3977 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Income Tax - Section 143(3)

  19. ITAT Delhi · 14 Aug 2014
    Whether in case an assessee has surrendered substantial income u/s 132(4) and paid the taxes thereon being part of the total surrender, provisions of penalty u/s 271AAA would automatically come into play.

    ACIT. Vs. SUSHIL KUMAR GUPTA

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3976 (ITAT-DELHI) · Income Tax - Sections 132, 142(1), 143(2), 158(1)(b), 271AAA

  20. ITAT Pune · 12 Aug 2014
    Whether when the AO has accepted the rectified PAN furnished by the assessee even then diallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) is warranted

    VIJAY SIDDHRAJ BASHTE Vs. ADDL. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3975 (ITAT-PUNE) · Income Tax - Sections 40(a)(ia), 104C, 194C, 206AA(6)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.