Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,058 rulings

  1. Karnataka High Court · 01 Oct 2014
    HC - If capital assets upgraded goes on changing as time progresses due to competition in the market then product development expense is revenue in nature

    CIT vs. Tejas Networks India (P) Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4545 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  2. Madras High Court · 01 Oct 2014
    HC - Size of the industry is big and there are large number of workers employed is no reason to deny benefit u/s 80P(2)(a)(ii) if it is a 'cottage industry'

    CIT vs The Chennimalai Industrial WCS Ltd and Ors

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4544 (HC-MADRAS) · Section. 80P(2)(a)(ii)

  3. Bombay High Court · 10 Oct 2014
    HC - Interest income arising from surplus funds assessable as business income eligible for sec. 80HHC benefit

    CIT vs. V.S. Dempo & Company Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4543 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 80HHC

  4. ITAT Delhi · 29 Nov 2014
    DRP’s stand that determination of ALP by the TPO is of no relevance in deciding the issue of suppressed sale by the assessee is not correct. Fact that products are sold below MRP does not mean the sales are suppressed

    Tianjin Tianshi Biological Development Company Ltd vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4542 (ITAT-DELHI)

  5. ITAT Chandigarh · 29 Nov 2014
    S. 2(15) Proviso/ 10(23C) (iv): Meaning of expression "not involving the carrying of any activity of profit" explained in detail

    ACIT vs. The Tribune Trust

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4541 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH) · Section 2(15)

  6. Bombay High Court · 28 Nov 2014
    S. 244A: Refund of self-assessment tax is entitled to interest

    The Stock Holding Corporation of India vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4540 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 244A

  7. ITAT Bangalore · 29 Nov 2014
    Profits on sale of carbon credits is not a taxable revenue receipt

    Subhash Kabini Power Corporation Ltd vs. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4539 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  8. ITAT Delhi · 29 Nov 2014
    As per proviso to s. 153C, the date of receiving books of account or documents shall be considered the date of search. Therefore, under proviso to s. 153C and s. 153A(1)(b), in the case of person in whose case action is required u/s 153C, the AO is empowered to take action u/s 153C for the year in which the seized document is received by him and the preceding six years

    R. L. Allied Industries vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4538 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 153C

  9. Bombay High Court · 28 Nov 2014
    S. 255(3): Action of ITAT President in forming Special Bench lacking in propriety

    Jagati Publications Ltd vs. ITAT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4537 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 255(3)

  10. Bombay High Court · 28 Nov 2014
    S. 80IB(10): Super built-up area cannot be equated with built-up area

    CIT vs. Hermes Developers

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4536 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 80IB(10)

  11. ITAT Hyderabad · 29 Nov 2014
    Consideration for use of software is not assessable as royalty under Article 12 of DTAA and s. 9(1)(vi)

    ADIT vs. Bartronics India Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4535 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 9(1)(vi)

  12. Supreme Court · 22 Aug 2014
    SC- SLP Dismissed

    Fiitjee Ltd. vs. DGIT(I) & Ors.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4534 (SC) · Section. 132

  13. AP High Court · 19 Nov 2014
    HC explains principle of undue enrichment

    Visakhapatnam Stevedores Association vs Union of India and Others

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4533 (HC-AP)

  14. Madras High Court · 19 Nov 2014
    HC - Amount received by Netherlands Company for hiring out dredgers to Indian sister concern for use in India ports not "Royalty"

    CIT vs Van Oord ACZ Equipment BV

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4532 (HC-MADRAS)

  15. Kerala High Court · 20 Nov 2014
    HC - Courts, under writ jurisdiction, cannot assume role of an appellate authority to conduct merit review of Settlement Commission's orders

    CIT vs Settlement Commission and Others

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4531 (HC-KERALA)

  16. Bombay High Court · 21 Nov 2014
    HC - No specific consideration paid as non-compete amount

    CIT vs. Govindlal C. Mandhana (HUF)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4530 (HC-BOMBAY)

  17. AP High Court · 21 Nov 2014
    HC - Levy of penalty cannot be resorted to as a matter of course

    D. Rama Rao vs ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4529 (HC-AP)

  18. AP High Court · 21 Nov 2014
    HC - Order u/s 158BC based on assessee's retracted statement recorded after search proceedings u/s 132 is quashed

    CIT vs. Naresh Kumar Agarwal

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4528 (HC-AP) · Section. 158BC

  19. Delhi High Court · 21 Nov 2014
    HC - Sec 11(5) not violated when CBDT specifically grants exemption

    DIT(E). vs. Indo French Centre

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4527 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 11(5), 1 l(l)(c)

  20. Bombay High Court · 21 Nov 2014
    HC - Once interest income on loan for earlier years taxed as income from other sources, loan waiver can't be "business income"

    CIT vs Digiwave Infrastructure & Services Limited

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4526 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section. 28(iv)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.