Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,058 rulings

  1. Delhi High Court · 02 Sep 2014
    HC - Consideration received on surrender of tenancy right after 14 years to be treated as long-term capital gain

    Commissioner of Income-tax v. Frick India Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4756 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58074&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Pune · 10 Dec 2014
    ITAT - On the basis of protocol to India-Sweden DTAA, a Swedish Company can claim the benefit of 'make available' condition in Indo-Portugal treaty to claim tax-free status for FTS received from its Indian Subsidiaries

    Sandvik AB v. Deputy Director of Income-tax, (International Taxation)-II, Pune

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4755 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=7640&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  3. Supreme Court · 14 Nov 2014
    SC - Tribunal could not have dismissed the appeal filed by the appellant for want of prosecution and it ought to have decided the appeal on merits even if the appellant or its counsel was not present when the appeal was taken up for hearing

    Balaji Steel Re-Rolling Mills Vs. Commissioner Of Central Excise And Customs

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4754 (SC)

  4. Bombay High Court · 03 Sep 2013
    HC - No Municipal / BMC Permission Required For use of Part of Premises for Professional Practice

    The Municipal Corporation for Greater Mumbai V/s. Dr. (Mrs.) Rekha S. Naik & Anr.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4753 (HC-BOMBAY)

  5. AP High Court · 10 Dec 2014
    HC - For concealment penalty u/s 271(l)(c), nature of satisfaction of AO need not be in writing, though the factum of satisfaction must be in writing in assessment order

    CIT vs Lotus Constructions

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4752 (HC-AP)

  6. Madras High Court · 05 Dec 2014
    HC - When the assessee has hired trucks on payment of hire charges for utilizing the same in its business, such payment of hire charges would not fall within the provisions of Section 194C of the Act.

    CIT vs. U.Bhaskaran

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4751 (HC-MADRAS)

  7. Delhi High Court · 05 Dec 2014
    HC - The word/expression "provision" by itself and alone without other information/material, would not reflect and indicate unascertained liability. Thus, mere surmise or suspicion cannot be a ground to reopen assessment

    CIT vs Valvoline Cummins Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4750 (HC-DELHI)

  8. ITAT Pune · 09 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Since premium was paid on share buy-back from two shareholder groups to protect assessee's business, the same is held to be revenue in nature

    DCIT vs. Bramha Corp. Hotels & Resorts Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4749 (ITAT-PUNE)

  9. ITAT Mumbai · 05 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Since development of property was not started in AY 2001-02 and substantial payments was received only in AY 2005, capital gains was taxable only in AY 2005-06. The transfer of property did not take place on the date of execution of development agreement

    Dilip Anand Vazirani vs. ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4748 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  10. ITAT Pune · 09 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Swedish-company could claim Fee for Technical Services ('FTS') received from its Indian subsidiaries as tax-exempt if 'make available' condition was not satisfied, as India-Sweden DTAA contained Most Favoured Nation clause ('MFN' clause) as per which make available clause in India-Portugese could be imported into the India-Sweden DTAA

    Sandvik AB vs DIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4747 (ITAT-PUNE)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 08 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Sec 54F exemption available to assessee for investing capital gains in acquiring 'under construction residential house and will qualify for stipulated period of 3 years (meant for construction of new house)

    Jyoti Arun Kothari vs ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4746 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 54F

  12. ITAT Lucknow · 08 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Deeming fiction created by virtue of section 50C in determining capital gain cannot be extended to section 11(1 A) and Section 11(1A) has to be applied for definite or limited purpose for which it is created. Sec 11(1A), being specific section governing taxability of capital gains for trusts and a complete code in itself, shall prevail over Sec 50C

    ACIT. Vs. The Upper India Chamber of Commerce

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4745 (ITAT-LUCKNOW) · Section. 50C, 11

  13. ITAT Bangalore · 31 Dec 2014
    ITAT - AO should verify whether actual services rendered by overseas affiliates through seconded employees to Indian assessee were technical services u/s 9(l)(vii)

    Cisco Systems Services B.E. vs. ADIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4744 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  14. ITAT Bangalore · 31 Oct 2014
    ITAT - For the purpose of Rule 3, (perquisite valuation), assesee falls in the category of 'others', and not of 'government department', as it is an autonomous body and merely received certain grant-in-aid from Government

    Central Food Technological Research Institute vs ITO

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4743 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  15. Delhi High Court · 08 Dec 2014
    A statutory order, even if a nullity, continues to be effective unless set aside by a competent authority. Such orders cannot be nullified by an administrative order

    R. K. Jain vs. Chairman, Settlement Commission

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4742 (HC-DELHI)

  16. ITAT Mumbai · 08 Dec 2014
    S. 194-I: Lease premium and additional Floor Space Index (FSI) charges paid to MMRDA is not "rent" for TDS

    ACIT vs. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4741 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 194-I

  17. ITAT Bangalore · 08 Dec 2014
    (i) S. 153A: Even in non-pending assessments where no incriminating material is found, AO is not limited to assessing “undisclosed” income, (ii) revenue expenditure on leased premises is not hit by sub-section (1A) to s. 32 or Explanation 1 to s. 32, (iii) Even income voluntarily disclosed in search is liable for 2. 234B/C interest

    M/s. Nandini Delux vs. ACIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4740 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 153A

  18. ITAT Delhi · 24 Nov 2014
    ITAT - If some 'Other income' is received by the Govt. Agency, which is otherwise permissible as per its activities and the amount of grant in aid is accordingly reduced to that extent, it cannot be said that the amount of 'Other income' should be charged to tax and the amount of Grant should be considered as an item of non-revenue nature

    Inland Waterways Authority of India vs. Addl CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4739 (ITAT-DELHI)

  19. ITAT Chennai · 24 Sep 2014
    ITAT - Re-assessment on the basis of information collected by Judges Inquiry Committee (JIC) and forwarded by member IRS officer is valid

    Justice P.D.Dinakaran vs DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4738 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  20. Gujarat High Court · 28 Nov 2014
    Can SEZ unit claim exemption from CVD when cleared to DTA based on an Exemption Notification

    Roxul Rockwool Insulation India Pvt Ltd. vs. UOI

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4735 (HC-GUJARAT)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.