Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,058 rulings

  1. Karnataka High Court · 17 Dec 2014
    HC - Even if service tax is paid prior to Show Cause Notice, still the penalty shall be leviable u/s 76/78, 77 of Finance Act’94

    K. Madhav Kamath Brother & Co. v. Asst. Comm. of Central Excise

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4892 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  2. ITAT Mumbai · 17 Sep 2014
    ITAT - Unless the decision of Marilyn Shipping & Transport is reversed by the Court, it is binding on all the benches of the Tribunal. Judicial discipline mandates that the decision of the special bench has to be followed by other benches

    Income Tax Officer Vs. Smt. Zeenat N. Shaik

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4891 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  3. ITAT Mumbai · 10 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Rejection of books of account and estimation of profit cannot be made without pointing out the defects

    ITO. Vs. M/s Royal Health Care Pvt. Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4890 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  4. ITAT Hyderabad · 30 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Assessee is entitled to carry forward the unabsorbed depreciation u/s 32(2) without any reference to section 57. Set off of unabsorbed depreciation against the rental income treated as income from other sources from discontinued activity is allowed.

    M/s. Ongole Educational Academy (P) Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4886 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39157&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  5. ITAT Hyderabad · 30 Dec 2014
    ITAT - The payment made by assessee to the producers for acquiring satellite rights is towards outright sale, distribution or exhibition of cinematographic films, which are specifically excluded under clause (v) of Explanation 2 from being treated as consideration paid towards royalty. The payments are outside the purview of section 194J

    Asst. Commissioner of Income tax Versus M/s. Aishwaraya Arts Creations P. Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4885 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39161&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Gujarat High Court · 30 Dec 2014
    HC - When loss shown by the assessee is not supported by a cogent documentary evidence, in the absence of such supporting material, loss is to be estimated

    GUJARAT HEAVY CHEMICALS LTD. Versus DY. CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4884 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58988&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  7. Gujarat High Court · 30 Dec 2014
    HC - For the purpose of interest u/s 234B and 234C, “assessed tax“ is defined to mean the tax assessed on regular assessment which means the tax determined on the application of Section 115J/115JA in the regular assessment

    ACIT Versus GUJARAT STEEL TUBES LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4883 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58961&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  8. Gujarat High Court · 30 Dec 2014
    HC - Cinecasting/distribution of movies would be outside the purview of section 194C requiring tax deduction at source since no work is carried out by the distributor

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus CITY GOLD ENTERTAINMENT PVT. LTD.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4882 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58989&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Mumbai · 29 Dec 2014
    ITAT - 'Depository charges' paid to Stock Exchange in the absence of the amount 'payable' at year end does not attract provisions of Sec 40(a)(ia)

    Arcadia Share & Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. DCIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4881 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 40(a)(ia)

  10. Karnataka High Court · 29 Dec 2014
    HC - 'Advance' given by a closely held company to its sister concerns and substantial shareholder does not fall within ambit of deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) if such a payment is made firstly not out of accumulated profits and secondly even if it is out of accumulated profits, but as trade advance as a consideration for the goods received or for purchase of a capital asset which indirectly would benefit the company advancing the loan, such advance cannot be brought within the word 'advance' used in the aforesaid provision

    Bagmane Constructions Pvt. Ltd. vs CIT

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4880 (HC-KARNATAKA)

  11. ITAT Ahmedabad · 29 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Since Commissioner (Appeals) had given relief to assessee by admitting and relying on additional evidence which was not before Assessing Officer, matter was to be restored back to file of Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication as per law

    Director of Income-tax (Exemption) v. Shree Nirman Foundation Charitable Trust

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4879 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=38066&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. AP High Court · 27 Dec 2014
    HC - Provision for revised power tariff could not be granted when it was neither stated that amount was paid to electricity supplier or that liability had been acknowledged. Simply stating that there was dispute between assessee and electricity supplier company regarding revised power tariff is not enough

    Coromandal Cements Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4878 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58137&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. AP High Court · 27 Dec 2014
    HC - Whenever an amount deducted as tax at source becomes incapable of being adjusted or counted towards tax payable, it acquires the character of income. In such an event, it partakes the character of any other income. No TDS credit will be available in case assessee had not offered corresponding income to tax in relevant year

    Y. Rathiesh v. Commissioner of Income-tax-I, Vishakhapatnam

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4877 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58004&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  14. Bombay High Court · 26 Dec 2014
    HC - Premature redemption premium can neither be treated as capital expenditure nor can it be spread over the period for which the debentures were issued as the contract between assessee and debenture holders came to an end

    CIT vs Grindwell Norton Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4876 (HC-BOMBAY)

  15. Bombay High Court · 26 Dec 2014
    HC - Delay should not be condoned only because the Revenue or the Government Department will be affected. Delay occurred essentially because the officers in the Department have not been vigilant and careful. Delay condoned only on Revenue assurance that Departmental affairs improving.

    CIT vs Goldgerg Finance Pvt. Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4875 (HC-BOMBAY)

  16. Delhi High Court · 26 Dec 2014
    HC - The purpose and objective behind sub-section (6) to Section 32A is to facilitate reconstruction and amalgamation and not to obstruct genuine transactions of such nature. Investment allowance benefit u/s 32A available in case of amalgamation

    CIT vs. DCM Ltd

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4874 (HC-DELHI) · Section 32A

  17. ITAT Mumbai · 27 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Setting off carry forward business losses now depends on the finality of the addition made by Assessing Officer u/s 14A. The allowability of setting off the carry forward business losses depends upon the total income as per the outcome of the appeal

    M/s. Ravian International (P) Ltd. (Now merged with M/s. Phulchand Exports (P) Ltd.) Versus Income Tax Officer

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4873 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39146&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  18. ITAT Mumbai · 27 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Even if the arm’s length interest adopted as 5.71% which is LIBOR + 2.5%, the assessee’s interest charged to the AE at the rate of 10% is more than the arm’s length interest rate and accordingly no adjustment on account of arm’s length of interest is warranted

    VIP. Industries Ltd. Versus Addl. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4872 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39147&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. ITAT Ahmedabad · 27 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Amount waived by the lender bank is not an income u/s 2(24) and further Section 28 also does not include amount of loan waive by the lender u/s 41 cannot apply to this receipt in respect of this amount

    DCIT Circle-5, Ahmedabad Versus Core Healthcare Ltd.

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4871 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39149&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. ITAT Hyderabad · 27 Dec 2014
    ITAT - Assessee is a distinct and separate legal/juristic entity and funds of the assessee also belong to assessee, income of A.P. Pollution Control Board has to be considered as income/receipt of the board and not of the state govt

    AP. Pollution Control Board, Hyderabad Versus Dy. Director of Income-tax (E)

    (2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 4870 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39152&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.