Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,058 rulings

  1. AP High Court · 07 Jan 2015
    HC - Once a company is categorized as the one carrying on speculation business, an act of segregation needs to be undertaken and the entire loss incurred by the company does not disqualify for set off against profits from other activities. Only portion of the loss which is incurred in the speculative activity gets disqualified.

    M/s. Melville Finvest Ltd. Versus Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Assts.)

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4979 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59061&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. Gujarat High Court · 07 Jan 2015
    HC - Principle of consistency - It would not be equitable to permit the revenue to take a different stand subsequently in respect of the amounts which were the subject matter of previous years’ assessment

    VIRENDRA R. GANDHI Versus ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4978 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59039&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  3. ITAT Pune · 07 Jan 2015
    ITAT - While granting the exemption or renewal of exemption u/s 80G(5) of the Act, the role of CIT is limited to look into the nature of activities being carried on by the institution or fund and the violation if any, of the provisions of section 13 of the Act and its various subsections are to be looked into by the AO while deciding the issue of grant of deduction u/s 11 and 12

    Ashoka Education Foundation Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4977 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39250&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  4. AP High Court · 06 Jan 2015
    HC - Once the appellant has the advantage of receiving a sum towards installation of machinery alone, the same deserves to be deducted from the WDV, to the extent it has been added to the value of block assets. It would have its own impact upon the amount of depreciation to be allowed on the block assets

    The Elegant Chemicals Enterprises Private Limited Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4968 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59053&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  5. Gujarat High Court · 06 Jan 2015
    HC - Assessee was liable to pay interest u/s 234B and 234C in respect of tax determined on the basis of Section 115JA

    JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus SUMIT INDUSTRIES LTD.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4967 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59054&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Bombay High Court · 06 Jan 2015
    HC - Revenue will not initiate any recovery proceedings till the disposal of the appeal filed by the petitioner with the Commissioner (Appeals).

    Disha Construction v. Ms. Devireddy Swapna

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4966 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59050&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  7. P&H High Court · 06 Jan 2015
    HC - Where Assessing Officer granted an opportunity to file a reply but after receiving a reply did not grant an opportunity of being heard, Assessing Officer cannot direct for special audit

    Isolux Corsan India Engineering & Construction (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Circle 1(1), Gurgaon

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4965 (HC-P&H) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58434&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Hyderabad · 06 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Where assessee had entered into a cost sharing exercise in implementing ERP systems in group company which involved services by assessee company, to be marked-up under TP norms

    Kirby Building Systems India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 8 (1), Hyderabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4964 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=38748&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Delhi High Court · 06 Jan 2015
    HC - Expenditure incurred in credit card business on account of credit investigation to verify information and data provided by prospective customers for issue of credit cards, is part of running cost, to be allowed as revenue expenditure

    Commissioner of Income-tax-III v. SBI Cards & Payment Services (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4963 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58471&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Delhi · 29 Dec 2014
    ITAT - In case the dividend income is not received by an assessee, the disallowance u/s 14A cannot be made

    ACIT. Vs. M/s. Bharat Hotels Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4958 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section. 14A

  11. ITAT Delhi · 18 Jul 2014
    ITAT - Incorrect claim would not tantamount to furnishing of inaccurate particulars and penalty u/s 271(c ) should not be levied on it

    ACIT. Vs. M/s. Beekman Heiix India Consulting P. Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4957 (ITAT-DELHI)

  12. ITAT Delhi · 03 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Maxim of “audi alteram partem”cannot be sacrificed at the altar of the administrative convenience or celebrity. the Right to be heard has a corresponding duty that the party invoking the discretion of the Court has to itself ensure that it does not abuse the exercise of discretion in its favour.

    Raman Kumar Kapoor v/s ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4956 (ITAT-DELHI)

  13. AP High Court · 05 Jan 2015
    HC - Transfer of assets by assessee-firm to a company in lieu of share allotment to partners is taxable as capital gains in the hands of the firm.

    Ana Labs vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4955 (HC-AP) · Section 45(4)

  14. ITAT Mumbai · 05 Jan 2015
    ITAT - In the case of bonus shares acquired by the assessee prior to April 1, 1981, the assessee was entitled to adopt the fair market value as on April 1, 1981 as the cost of acquisition but in case bonus shares were acquired after April 1, 1981, the cost of acquisition would be Nil.

    DDIT. Vs. H & R Johnson (Overseas) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4954 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  15. ITAT Mumbai · 05 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Neither the assessee nor the Revenue has the right to flout the decision of the Tribunal and being an officer functioning under the Government of India it is his obligation to follow the directions of the superior authority and even if there is consent he should not have collected the amount. AO tendered an unconditional apology for his conduct. Approach of the AO cannot be appreciated

    Johnson & Johnson Ltd. Versus Additional Commissioner of Income-tax, LTU

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4953 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=7596&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Pune · 05 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Merely because subsequently another decision of the Coordinate Bench of the ITAT is noticed by the AO, that will not vests the jurisdiction in the AO to exercise his powers u/s. 147 of the Act

    Magnum Forge and Machine Works Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4952 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39228&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Gujarat High Court · 05 Jan 2015
    HC - The quantum of penalty must be determined by reference to the law as it stood when the offence or default was committed.. The amendment brought about to section 272A(2) is purely procedural in nature providing for the machinery for having and collecting penalty. This amendment does not affect the very ingredients of the default contemplated u/s 206

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III Versus SOUTH GUJARAT ROLLER FLOUR MILLS

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4950 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59030&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  18. ITAT Hyderabad · 05 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Understatement in terms of section 50C being prima facie established, assumption of jurisdiction u/s 147 is justified

    Rupakula Srinivas v. Income-tax, Ward-1 (1), Hyderabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4949 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=37776&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. ITAT Hyderabad · 05 Jan 2015
    ITAT - For purposes of computation of arm's length price, a Company couldn't be excluded from list of comparables merely because it was making losses. Due to amalgamation during the year the assessee's business model had changed. For all the three reasons, employee cost filter, outsourcing and amalgamation, a company cannot be selected as comparable.

    Brigade Global Services (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-1 (2), Hyderabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4948 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=38940&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Madras High Court · 05 Jan 2015
    HC - When there is a clear and categorical admission of the undisclosed income by the assessee himself, there is no necessity to scrutinize the documents. In fact, when there is a clear admission, voluntarily made, by the assessee, that would constitute a good piece of evidence for the revenue.

    B. Kishore Kumar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle-IV (1), Chennai

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 4947 (HC-MADRAS) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58536&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.