Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,058 rulings

  1. ITAT Bangalore · 23 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Provision for loss on derivative contracts is an item of expenditure under s. 37(1) as there is an actual contract for sale of merchandise

    M/s. Quality Engineering and Software Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 12(2), Bangalore

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5138 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39418&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Delhi · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Expenditure (like audit fees) required to be incurred irrespective of income cannot be disallowed. Investments in subsidiaries are not to earn dividend income and cannot be considered for disallowance u/s 14A/ Rule 8D

    ITO vs. Pioneer Radio Training Services Pvt. Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5128 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 14A

  3. ITAT Mumbai · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - The transaction of sale to the AE and credit period allowed in realization of sale proceeds are closely linked as they are inter linked and the terms and conditions of sale as well as the price are determined based on the totality of the transaction and not on individual and separate transaction.

    Goldstar Jewellery Limited vs. JCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5127 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  4. ITAT Hyderabad · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Taxability of stock options allotted outside India by foreign co to NOR employee for services rendered in India considered. assessee having residential status of ‘not ordinarily resident’, only that portion of the stock awards and SOTP attributable to services rendered in India can form part of total income

    Anil Bhansali vs. ITO

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5126 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 5(1)

  5. ITAT Bangalore · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - When the assessee claims that the assessee has paid the management fee to the AE, no doubt the burden is on the assessee to prove that it has received services from its AE. But when the assessee has produced such material before any of the authorities below it is also the duty of the authorities to consider the same before coming to any conclusion on merits.

    M/s. Safran Aerospace India Pvt. Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5125 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=7801&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  6. ITAT Ahmedabad · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Conditions precedent for allowability of labour charges for repairing of vehicles

    The DCIT Patan Circle Patan Versus Gayatri Construction Co.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5124 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39376&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  7. ITAT Delhi · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - For initiating valid jurisdiction u/s 153C, the date on which exercise is done would be considered as the date of receiving the books of account or document by the AO having jurisdiction over such other person.

    Sh. Bhupinder Pal Singh Sarna Versus Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax, New Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5123 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39380&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Lucknow · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - As per the provisions of clause (iiiae) of section 10(23C), only those income which are received by a hospital on account of treatment is exempt u/s 10(23C)(iiiae) and not any income received by the said entity

    Income Tax Officer-2(2), Lucknow Versus Radha Mohan Mehrotra Medical Relief Trust

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5122 (ITAT-LUCKNOW) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39381&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Hyderabad · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - When undisputedly, there is no cost of acquisition to assessee, the computation provision fails, accordingly, capital gain cannot be computed. No Long Term Capital Gain when assessee executed a release deed of property.

    Income-tax Officer, Ward – 4(1) Versus Sri Anthati Bikshapathy

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5121 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39383&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Delhi · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - On record creditworthiness of donor and genuineness of gift is not proved because the assessee had no direct relationship with the donor and in the absence of any direct relationship, natural love and affection between the donor and donee was not established

    Shri Prem Prakash Chaudhary Versus DCIT, CC-23, New Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5120 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39387&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Gujarat High Court · 22 Jan 2015
    Hc - It is evident that the assessee had inflated the expenditure by showing higher amount of purchase price through the fictitious invoices in the names of 33 bogus suppliers. Considering the overall factual scenario, the Tribunal was justified in disallowing 25% of the purchase price.

    VIJAY PROTEINS LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5119 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59181&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Gujarat High Court · 22 Jan 2015
    HC - When the services are rendered partially, revenue is to be shown proportionate to the degree of completion of the service and therefore the assessee was justified in spreading over the amount of membership fee and expenses.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus WINNER BUSINESS LINK PVT. LTD.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5118 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59180&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. Bombay High Court · 22 Jan 2015
    HC - If the assessment order is to be disturbed, then the Assessing Officer must strictly satisfy the condition precedent as provided under Section 147/148 before he can issue a notice, seeking to reopen an assessment.

    GKN Sinter Metals Ltd. (Formerly Mahindra Sintered Products Ltd.) Versus Ms. Ramapriya Raghavan, The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 2(1) And Others

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5117 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59186&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  14. ITAT Lucknow · 22 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Order passed by an officer equal in rank to CIT can only be challenged before ITAT and not before CIT(A)

    Raibareilly District Co-operative Bank Ltd vs DIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5116 (ITAT-LUCKNOW)

  15. HP High Court · 21 Jan 2015
    HC - Unless the assessee knows the precise reasons for the transfer orders u/s 127, he would be handicapped in putting forth his objections effectively and in case the transfer of case is based on extraneous considerations then issuance of show cause notice becomes meaningless and is reduced to an idle formality

    Anand Chauhan and Others vs CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5115 (HC-HP) · Section 127

  16. Madras High Court · 21 Jan 2015
    HC - 'Business exigency' is reasonable cause u/s 273B for purported violation of Sec 269SS/269T for dealing in cash loans. No penalty on short term cash borrowings from friends in emergency

    CIT vs. T.Perumal

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5114 (HC-MADRAS)

  17. ITAT Jaipur · 21 Jan 2015
    ITAT - In order to impose any penalty, it is obligatory on the part of the Officer to indicate specific allegation. Penalty for non-filing of transfer pricing documents cannot be levied in a general manner

    ACIT vs. Gillette India Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5113 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · Section 92D, 271G

  18. ITAT Delhi · 21 Jan 2015
    ITAT - Important propositions of law laid down for cancellation of registration u/s 12AA as also for an assessee to be classified as charitable under the residuary category

    Delhi & District Cricket Association vs. DIT (E)

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5112 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 11

  19. ITAT Mumbai · 21 Jan 2015
    ITAT - It is the real accrual of income that has to be taken into consideration and not a hypothetical accrual of income. The rights would commence in respect of each of the films on different dates and accordingly the assessee has offered the income in subsequent years in respect of advance received for transfer of home video & satellite broadcasting for a period of five years

    B. R. Films vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5111 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  20. Delhi High Court · 21 Jan 2015
    HC - The sine quo non for action under Section 147 (to deal with escapement of income) is gathering or availability of some “tangible material” requiring the matter to be re-opened. Assessment cannot be reopened in the absence of "fresh material"

    Donaldson India Filters Systems Pvt. Ltd vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 5110 (HC-DELHI) · Section 147

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.