Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,049 rulings

  1. Bombay High Court · 07 May 2015
    HC - Reimbursement from agents received by Maersk (a Danish shipping co.) from its Indian agents for Maersk Net Communication system is not FTS but shipping profits, not taxable in India

    DIT. Vs. A.P. Moller Maersk

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6463 (HC-BOMBAY)

  2. Bombay High Court · 06 May 2015
    HC - Advertisement-revenue earned by assessee (a Mauritian based company) through its Indian agents (including one of its Indian Group entity) is not taxable in India

    DIT. Vs. B4U International Holdings Limited

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6462 (HC-BOMBAY)

  3. ITAT Bangalore · 06 May 2015
    ITAT - Inter-unit charges by assessee having two eligible EOUs will not form part of "Total Turnover" for the purpose of computing deduction u/s.10B.

    K. Mohan & Company (Exports) Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6461 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section. 10B

  4. ITAT Ahmedabad · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - Disallowance of unutilized MODVAT/CENVAT Credit - The purchases which have been debited in the P & L account alongwith MODVAT account and appearing in the closing stock are also with MODVAT account. Thus, no adjustment u/s. 145 was required to be made.

    Income-Tax Officer Versus M/s Murli Fabrics

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6460 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40381&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  5. ITAT Hyderabad · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - Before rejecting the books of account AO should not only give adequate opportunity to assessee to explain the entries made therein, but also point out any specific defect or deficiency in the books of account.

    M/s BP Ferrium Industries Pvt Ltd (Formerly Known AS M/s Godavari Exports And Imports Pvt Ltd) Versus Asstt Commissioner Of Income-Tax & Others

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6459 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40505&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - Since the department itself has accepted assessee’s claim for writing off of preliminary expenses in the immediately preceding assessment year, disallowance of similar claim in subsequent year will not make it a fit case for levy of concealment penalty

    Lexicon Finance Ltd Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6458 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40379&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  7. ITAT Delhi · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - Income earned by the assessee from rendering legal consultancy is carried out by the assessee is a purely commercial activity, howsoever altruistic be the motive, and it cannot be treated as an educational or charitable activity.

    Kali Center For Legal Reforms And Research Centre Versus Income-Tax Officer

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6456 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40383&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. Delhi High Court · 07 May 2015
    HC - Section 144 does not at all apply to the present proceedings because the present proceedings originate from an assessment under Section 143(3) of the Act.

    M/s. Shivnandan Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Omshiv Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax & Another

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6455 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61054&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Delhi · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - Additional evidence by assessee to prove that its liaison office in India was not its PE was required to be admitted .

    Sagem Defence Securite Sa India Liaison Office, BMR & Associates v. Deputy Director of Income-tax (International Taxation), Circle-2(2), New Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6454 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=3724&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Ahmedabad · 07 May 2015
    ITAT - It is required from CIT(A) to discuss appropriate method and comparable instances to determine ALP in order decide TP issue.

    Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Vapi Circle, Vapi v. Universal Comfort Products (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6453 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40229&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Gujarat High Court · 07 May 2015
    HC - For sec. 32A allowance, date of original purchase contract is relevant and not date of revised one,

    Shaily Eng. Plastics (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax (Asst.)

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6452 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61055&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Bombay High Court · 05 May 2015
    HC - No s. 14A and Rule 8D disallowance can be made for shares held as stock-in-trade

    CIT vs. India Advantage Securities Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6451 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 14A

  13. Karnataka High Court · 06 May 2015
    HC - Filing of Form No.15I/J is only directory and not mandatory. Also, only if there is any breach of requirements of Section 194C(3), the question of applicability of Section 40(a)(ia) arises.

    CIT. vs. Marikamba Transport Company

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6450 (HC-KARNATAKA) · Sections. 40(a)(ia), 194C(3)

  14. ITAT Pune · 06 May 2015
    ITAT - Sales tax benefit is to be taxed as business receipts of the assessee, on which the assessee is not entitled to deduction under section 80IA

    M/s. Patankar Wind Farm Pvt. Ltd. Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6448 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40515&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  15. ITAT Delhi · 06 May 2015
    ITAT - AO, Agra has not complied with the mandatory requirement of Sec. 127 but suo moto transferred the file from Agra to AO, New Delhi as if he has entered into the shoes of the Chief Commissioner or Commissioner of Income Tax; order passed is invalid and void ab initio

    M/s. KIE Infrastructures & Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6447 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40519&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Mumbai · 06 May 2015
    ITAT - In the case of lab results, the TSPs/ collectors / aggregators are not going to be benefited by the test results and it is the patient who is going to be benefitted by the lab results. AO to examine the fact to ascertain true relationship in respect of payment made to TSPs are commission or brokerage (For TDS u/s 194H)

    ITO Versus M/s Thyrocare Technologies Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6446 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40360&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Karnataka High Court · 06 May 2015
    HC - It is mandatory that if the application for renewal of recognition under Section 80G is not disposed of within six months from the date on which the application is made, the Commissioner has no jurisdiction either to pass an order granting the approval or rejecting it

    M/s. Maheshwari Foundation Versus The Director of Income-tax (Exemptions), Bangalore

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6445 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61008&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  18. Gujarat High Court · 06 May 2015
    HC - Assessment u/s 143(3) is void ab initio since the notice under Section 143(2) of the Act was issued beyond the period of limitation

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-II Versus GUJARAT FOILS LIMITED

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6444 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61024&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  19. ITAT Delhi · 06 May 2015
    ITAT - Compensation paid to clear title of land (to remove impediments or encumbrances) has to be allowed as deduction under head 'cost of improvement'.

    Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 24 (1), New Delhi v. Pushkar Dutt Sharma

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6442 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40523&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. Gujarat High Court · 06 May 2015
    HC - Professional outstanding fee received by advocate from his client after elevated to post of High Court's Judge would not be taxable u/s 4.

    Commissioner of Income-tax v. Anil R. Dave

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6441 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61049&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.