Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,035 rulings

  1. AP High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Recovery of tax-demand (recovery proceedings) from successor prior to its incorporation & without assessment is not justified.

    Telangana State Beverages Corporation limited vs. UOI

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6550 (HC-AP)

  2. Delhi High Court · 13 May 2015
    HC - Through a series of transactions - which were, essentially, book entries - the assessee had devised a loss ('inter-linked' share transactions) to set off against its other income.

    Vishishth Chay Vyapar Ltd vs CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6549 (HC-DELHI)

  3. Bombay High Court · 13 May 2015
    HC - Settlement Commission’s order u/s 245D(2C) allowing assessee’s settlement application is to be quashed as it was passed without considering objections of Revenue by some modicum of reasons.

    CIt vs Sai Prasad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6548 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. ITAT Mumbai · 14 May 2015
    ITAT - Transfer Pricing adjustments made by the AO in contradiction to the mandatory instructions of the CBDT (Jurisdiction of the AO in making the assessment without referring the matter to the Transfer Pricing Officer where the value of international transactions exceeded ₹ 5 crores) is bad in law.

    M/s. SG. Asia Holdings (India) Pvt. Ltd. Versus The ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6547 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=8092&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  5. ITAT Delhi · 14 May 2015
    ITAT - CIT(A) have considered the fact that some personal expenditure could also have been incurred by the assessee in making payment through credit card, so the disallowance made by the AO was rightly restricted to 5% of credit card expenses.

    ITO Versus Kanwar Deep Anand

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6546 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40598&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. ITAT Ahmedabad · 14 May 2015
    ITAT - Disclosure of income during search operation would get immunised from the levy of penalty.

    Ehasan Haji Amin Gadawala Versus As STT Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6545 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40599&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  7. AP High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - The statement recorded under section 132(4) of the Act would certainly constitute an important basis for an Assessing Officer to take necessary steps under the provisions of the Act

    Y. Ramachandra Reddy Versus Addl. CIT (Assts) SR-V, Hyderabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6543 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=59279&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  8. AP High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Income received by the assessee, by way of rent from letting out of the godowns, was the income received from property and it would not fall under the head income from business.

    The Commissioner of Income Tax Versus M/s. Sileman Khan Mahaboob Khan

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6542 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61111&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  9. Delhi High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Notional interest accruing from other sources was not “real income” in the facts and circumstances of this case. Thus, no addition.

    Commissioner of Income Tax Central –II Versus M/s. Navbharat Export

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6541 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61112&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Patna High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Where CIT (Appeals) exercised only overriding power under rule 46A(4) in considering documents furnished by assessee and found investment proper, deletion of additions under sec. 69 by CIT without hearing AO was justified as it was not a case of admission of new evidence.

    Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Patna v. Sagar Construction (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6540 (HC-PATNA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61110&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Gujarat High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Since amendment to sec. 40(a)(ia) by Finance Act, 2010, with effect from 1-4-2005 has retro-effect, no disallowance can be made if TDS is deposited before due date of filing return under section 139(1).

    Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad-IV v. Omprakash R. Chaudhary

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6539 (HC-GUJARAT) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=58641&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  12. ITAT Pune · 14 May 2015
    ITAT - TPO was not correct in changing TP method in subsequent year where circumstances remained unchanged

    John Deere India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-11 (1), Pune

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6538 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39939&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  13. Delhi High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Where AO had accepted valuation during assessment then no reassessment can be made by AO on basis of valuation report of DVO.

    Prabhu Dayal Rangwala v. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6537 (HC-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61115&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  14. P&H High Court · 14 May 2015
    HC - Power to transfer assessment is an administrative power which necessarily inheres power to re-transfer

    Kuantum Papers Ltd. v. Union of India

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6536 (HC-P&H) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60413&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  15. ITAT Bangalore · 14 May 2015
    ITAT - Since assessee's turnover was Rs. 47.46 crores, companies having turnover of more than Rs. 200 crores had to be eliminated from list of comparables. Also, companies in which related party transactions exceeded 15 per cent could not be taken as comparables.

    Cypress Semiconductor Technology India (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 11 (2), Bangalore

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6535 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=8013&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Bangalore · 12 May 2015
    ITAT - Where AOP (formed by assessee for jointly developing property, whereby assessee agreed to provide land as capital contribution) stood terminated, settlement amount received by assessee will not be taxable as capital gains.

    Ind Sing Developers P. Ltd. vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6512 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  17. Delhi High Court · 12 May 2015
    HC - There are three key factors relevant for valuation of goodwill - duration of functioning of assessee, quantum of orders in hand when collaboration agreement was executed and monopoly over a product held by assessee.

    CIT. vs. Motherson Auto P. Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6511 (HC-DELHI)

  18. Supreme Court · 12 May 2015
    SC - Sec 43B is applicable to outstanding vend fee payable to State Government as clause (a) to Sec 43B considerably widened by the addition of the words “by whatever name called”.

    CIT. vs. Travancore Sugars & Chemicals Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6510 (SC) · Section. 43B

  19. Gujarat High Court · 12 May 2015
    HC - Where agreement was in substance a finance lease and not a mere hire purchase, thus liable to erstwhile interest tax.

    CIT. vs. Axis Bank Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6509 (HC-GUJARAT)

  20. Gujarat High Court · 11 May 2015
    HC - Assessee (100% EOU) is entitled to sec 10B deduction based on approval granted by Development Commissioner and subsequently ratified by Board of approval.

    CIT. vs. ECI Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6508 (HC-GUJARAT) · Section. 10B

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.