Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,035 rulings

  1. Karnataka High Court · 08 Jun 2015
    Interest paid on loan amount sanctioned by bank was directly made over to retiring partners as full payment of consideration agreed to be paid by continuing partners to retiring partners for relinquishment of their share, amount borrowed not for purpose of business. Interest not allowable

    Hotel Roopa v. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6835 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61249&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Gauhati · 08 Jun 2015
    ITAT(TM) - President or Third Member has no right to go beyond scope of reference and has to consider only difference of opinion as stated by Members of Bench

    Income-tax Officer, Ward 3 (1), Guwahati v. Purbanchal Safety Glass (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6834 (ITAT-GAUHATI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40976&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  3. ITAT Pune · 08 Jun 2015
    ITAT - ALP of 'Soyabean' and 'Sunflower' oil is to be determined on basis of rate quoted in Commodity Exchanges i.e., oil, was a commodity recognized for trading in Commodities Exchanges, price publications of CBOT and Oil World were relevant material while testing international transactions of import of oil from AEs in course of application of CUP method

    Cargill Foods India Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-4, Pune

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6833 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40975&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  4. Supreme Court · 05 Jun 2015
    SC - Gujarat HC’s direction is to be substituted with respect to striking down Sec 80HHC retro amendment on DEPB.

    CIT. vs. Avani Exports & Anr.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6832 (SC) · Section. 80HHC

  5. Delhi High Court · 05 Jun 2015
    HC - It is settled law that there is no bar for grant of relief (extension of stay beyond 365 days under ‘writ’ jurisdiction) if the Court is of the opinion that the circumstances and the ends of justice so warrant.

    CANON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6831 (HC-DELHI)

  6. Supreme Court · 05 Jun 2015
    SC - HC’s order quashing re-assessment notice under writ jurisdiction is to be quashed as the is erroneous.

    DCIT. & Anr. vs. Zuari Estate Dev. & Investment Comp. Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6830 (SC)

  7. Allahabad High Court · 05 Jun 2015
    HC - In the absence of search in case of assessee, notice u/s 158BC is not valid

    CIT. vs. Anil Kumar Chadha

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6829 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · Section. 158BC

  8. Uttarakhand High Court · 05 Jun 2015
    HC - Dry docking Expenses are allowable as revenue expenditure to ONGC

    CIT. vs. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6828 (HC-UTTARAKHAND)

  9. ITAT Ahmedabad · 06 Jun 2015
    ITAT - The transaction of transfer of property would relate to the date when the sale-deed was executed, sale consideration was paid and possession was handed over but not on date when document was presented before the Registrar for registration of the sale-deed.

    Amitkumar Ambalal Shah v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-10 (2), Ahmedabad

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6827 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=38500&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Pune · 06 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Where view taken by AO being one of possible views, could not be regarded as erroneous and prejudicial to interest of revenue, no revision u/s 263.

    Mudhol Land Holding Company (P.) Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6826 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40939&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  11. ITAT Delhi · 06 Jun 2015
    ITAT - A company providing software development services is different from a company providing non-development software services

    Tata McGraw Hill Education (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 16 (1), New Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6825 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=39802&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. Karnataka High Court · 06 Jun 2015
    HC - Where revised return was declared as invalid then tax and interest amount paid on revised income needs to be refunded.

    K. Nagesh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Bangalore

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6824 (HC-KARNATAKA) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61246&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  13. ITAT Jaipur · 06 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Valuation loss on stock-in-trade of shares to be allowed as purchases were genuine and valuation was made as per AS-2

    Income-tax Officer, Ward 6 (1), Jaipur v. Smt. Meena Baid

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6823 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=37699&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  14. ITAT Jaipur · 02 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Addition made solely on the basis of a disclosure and without any incriminating material is not sustainable if facts show that disclosure was under duress. CBDT Instruction dated 10.03.2003 relied

    Shri Basant Bansal vs. ACIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6822 (ITAT-JAIPUR) · Section 143(3)/153A

  15. ITAT Chandigarh · 02 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Under section 11(1)(a), charitable institutions are eligible to a blanket deduction of 15% of the gross receipts without being required to satisfy any condition

    ITO vs. Bhartiya Vidya Mandir Trust

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6821 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH) · Section 11(1)(a)

  16. ITAT Delhi · 02 Jun 2015
    ITAT - For the purpose of sections 2(15)/11, before any activity can be branded as being in the nature of trade or commerce, the AO has to demonstrate the intention of parties backed with facts and figures of carrying out activities with profit motive. Mere surplus from any activity which has been undertaken to achieve the dominant object does not imply that the same is run with profit motive. The intention has to be gathered from circumstances which compelled the carrying on the activity

    India International Centre vs. ADIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6820 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections 2(15), 11

  17. Calcutta High Court · 05 Jun 2015
    HC - Hire charges received by a lessor under a hire- purchase transaction is not in the nature of interest.

    Rani Leasing & Finance Ltd. vs. CIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6819 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  18. ITAT Mumbai · 04 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Gift amounting to Rs. 160 crore received by assessee-company from other Indian corporate bodies is not taxable, being capital receipt for AY 2009-10.

    DCIT. Vs. KDA enterprises

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6818 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  19. ITAT Delhi · 05 Jun 2015
    ITAT - A company providing high end services, i.e., special knowledge and domain expertise, cannot be compared to a low end service provider, namely, call center services

    iQor India Services (P.) Ltd. v. Income-tax Officer, Ward 11 (4), New Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6817 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenINTL.aspx?ID=8126&Category=INTLDecisions&CategoryType=Zip

  20. ITAT Delhi · 05 Jun 2015
    ITAT - Since receipt as well as making of gift were authorized by respective Memorandum and Articles of Association of assessee and donor companies and all essential requisites of a valid gift had been duly fulfilled, no tax or MAT on donee-company

    Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, 3 (2), Mumbai v. KDA Enterprises (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 6816 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40160&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.