Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,035 rulings

  1. ITAT Delhi · 18 Aug 2015
    ITAT - Transfer Pricing - The allotment of shares/ receipt of share application money by the assessee from the AE for a price less than the book value of the shares cannot be regarded as a “deemed loan” by the assessee to the AE and notional interest cannot be computed thereon

    First Blue Home Finance Ltd vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8495 (ITAT-DELHI)

  2. Supreme Court · 17 Aug 2015
    SC - Section 234B interest is automatic if conditions are met. Form I.T.N.S. 150 is a part of the assessment order and it is sufficient if the levy of interest is stated there.

    CIT vs. Bhagat Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8494 (SC) · Section 234B

  3. Supreme Court · 18 Aug 2015
    SC - High Courts, being Courts of Record under Article 215, have the inherent power of review. There is nothing in s. 260A(7) to restrict the applicability of the provisions of the CPC to s. 260A appeals.

    CIT vs. Meghalaya Steels Ltd

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8493 (SC) · Section 260A

  4. Bombay High Court · 19 Aug 2015
    HC - Capital gains on conversion of capital assets into stock-in-trade, is payable only in year in which assessee ultimately sells such stock-in-trade, still AO was directed to determine date of conversion of capital asset into stock-in-trade for capital gain purposes.

    Commissioner of Income-tax- III v. Saffire Hotels (P.) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8492 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60637&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  5. ITAT Delhi · 19 Aug 2015
    ITAT - Since interest income earned from employees, machines hire charges, rent receipts and sundry receipts could not be characterised income derived from eligible undertaking, deduction claimed by assessee under section 80-IA would not be allowed.

    Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. THDC India Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8491 (ITAT-DELHI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=40347&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  6. Uttarakhand High Court · 19 Aug 2015
    HC - Interest received on the refund of Income Tax is not taxable under Section 44BB.

    B.J. Services Company Middle State Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax,(O.S.D.) Range-1, Dehradun

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8489 (HC-UTTARAKHAND) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61670&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  7. AP High Court · 19 Aug 2015
    HC - Every individual article/unit/component of shuttering material cannot be treated as plant. Not entitled to claim 100 per cent depreciation on centering/shuttering material.

    Commissioner of Income-tax, Visakhapatnam v. S. Vijaya Kumar

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8488 (HC-AP) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=61328&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  8. Supreme Court · 18 Aug 2015
    SC - Interest u/s 234B was part of Form I.T.N.S. 150, which contained calculation of interest payable on assessed tax, therefore Sec 234B interest is to be levied for shortfall in advance tax payment despite no direction in the assessment order for payment of interest.

    CIT. vs. Bhagat Construction Co.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8486 (SC) · Section. 234B

  9. Bombay High Court · 19 Aug 2015
    HC - Mere fact that explanation of assessee was not accepted in quantum proceedings would not ipso facto become a reason to levy penalty for concealment on assessee. No concealment penalty if amount in question was disclosed in notes to accounts and return. Disclosure of amount was made by assessee as a part of notes to its accounts as well as by a letter given alongwith return of income claiming same as not taxable, would be considered as a complete disclosure of all relevant facts.

    Commissioner of Income-tax-12 v. S.M. Construction

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8485 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60654&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Supreme Court · 17 Aug 2015
    Interest u/s 234B is automatic even if assessment order does not contain any direction for payment- SC

    Bhagat Construction Co Private Limited vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Delhi

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8480 (SC) · Section. 234B

  11. Bombay High Court · 18 Aug 2015
    HC - Just because order is challenged in High Court u/s 260A but is yet to be admitted, ITAT can't deny rectification u/s 254.

    R. W. Promotions (P.) Ltd. v. Income tax Appellate Tribunal

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8476 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=60969&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  12. ITAT Bangalore · 18 Aug 2015
    ITAT - ALP of interest on loans given to AE located abroad has to be fixed on basis of LIBOR

    Indegene Lifesystems (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income tax, Circle 11(4), Bangalore

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8475 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=41540&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  13. ITAT Cuttack · 18 Aug 2015
    ITAT - Since quarterly return of TDS could be filed only after paying tax to Central Government, penalty had to be levied for delay only from date of paying tax to Central Government instead of due date of filing return.

    N.K. Media Ventures (P.) Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS) Bhubaneswar

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8474 (ITAT-CUTTACK) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=42165&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  14. ITAT Mumbai · 18 Aug 2015
    ITAT - Once the assessee has complied with the provisions of sec. 195 and obtained a certificate from the AO in accordance with the requirement of sec. 195(2) then, the assessee cannot be penalized by invoking the provisions of sec. 40a(i).

    DCIT. vs. Carl Zeiss India (P) Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8473 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 40(a)(i)

  15. ITAT Mumbai · 17 Aug 2015
    ITAT - Where entire ‘reasons recorded’ for reassessment proceedings initiated by AO are purely in the realm of surmises”, the same needs to be quashed.

    Popley Diamond and Gold Plaza Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8472 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  16. Bombay High Court · 17 Aug 2015
    HC - No deduction to assessee for payment for preventing compulsory acquisition of land as the same is capital in nature.

    Sandvik Asia Limited vs. DCIT

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8471 (HC-BOMBAY)

  17. Bombay High Court · 15 Aug 2015
    HC - Amount received by retiring partner towards goodwill in AY 1992-93 not taxable as casual & non-recurring receipt under Sec 10(3).

    Manish R. Shah vs. ITO

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8470 (HC-BOMBAY)

  18. P&H High Court · 14 Aug 2015
    HC - Merely because a person or an entity is a partner of a firm it does not necessarily follow that he was aware of every detail of the income tax returns filed by the firm. Interest u/s 215 deleted.

    CIT. vs. Mahesh Munjal

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8469 (HC-P&H) · Section. 215

  19. Bombay High Court · 14 Aug 2015
    HC - Assessee’s claim of bad-debts on account of write-off of inter-corporate deposits (‘ICDs’) receivable allowed.

    The Commissioner Income Tax Vs. Pudumjee Pulp & Paper Mills Ltd.

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8468 (HC-BOMBAY)

  20. Supreme Court · 14 Aug 2015
    SC - CBDT’s SLP against Gujarat HC ruling dismissed which allowed writ praying return filing due-date extension.

    CBDT. Vs. All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants

    (2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 8467 (SC)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.