Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

16,018 rulings

  1. Bombay High Court · 18 May 2016
    HC - Expenses incurred after closure of unit arising out of statutory compulsion are allowable u/s 37(1).

    Commissioner of Income Tax-7 Versus M/s. Nicholas Piramal (India) Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10205 (HC-BOMBAY) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=65285&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. Allahabad High Court · 18 May 2016
    HC - Where the issuance of a notice itself was not within the prescribed period, the question of whether it was served correctly or otherwise, would be of no relevance whatsoever.

    Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) , Lucknow Versus M/s Sushila Umrao Singh Charitable & Educational Trust, Allah

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10203 (HC-ALLAHABAD) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=65287&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  3. Delhi High Court · 17 May 2016
    HC - AO’s belief that assessee’s India subsidiary constituted its PE cannot be 'reason' for reopening of assessment in the hands of the assessee.

    ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX AND ANR

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10200 (HC-DELHI)

  4. ITAT Chennai · 17 May 2016
    ITAT - No deduction for ESOP expenses incurred through ESOP trust for buying equity shares from its employees.

    Shriram Insight Share vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10199 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  5. ITAT Hyderabad · 16 May 2016
    S. 50C/ 54F: In allowing exemption u/s 54F, the deemed consideration u/s 50C has to be taken into consideration and it cannot be restricted to the consideration mentioned in the sale deed

    ITO vs. Kondal Reddy Mandal Reddy

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10198 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Sections 50C, 54F

  6. Bombay High Court · 16 May 2016
    Transfer Pricing: High Court irked at fact that Dept is unaware of which of its matters are admitted/ dismissed. Chief CIT directed to streamline the procedure for filing appeal before the High Court. Adjustment can be made only for transactions attributable to the International taxation

    CIT vs. TCL India Holdings Pvt. Ltd

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10197 (HC-BOMBAY)

  7. Delhi High Court · 16 May 2016
    HC - CBDT Instruction No. 1/2015 dated January 13, 2015, shall not be relied upon to deny tax refund to an assessee where notice for scrutiny assessment u/s. 143(3) has been issued to the assessee.

    TATA TELESERVICES LIMITED Vs. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES & ANR.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10196 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 119

  8. ITAT Bangalore · 16 May 2016
    ITAT - ‘Customer relationship rights’ paid upon acquisition of business undertaking cannot be regarded as non-compete fees.

    Incap Contract Manufacturing Services Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10195 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  9. Delhi High Court · 16 May 2016
    HC - Sec. 48 will be applicable to shareholders directly receiving part de-merger consideration instead of transferor co.. Same not not "diversion of income at the very source".

    CIT. vs. Salora International Ltd.

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10194 (HC-DELHI)

  10. ITAT Mumbai · 13 May 2016
    ITAT - Once a claim is not arising out of the mandate and directions of the Tribunal, then, the same cannot be raked up or a fresh claim can be made in the second round of proceedings.

    Lifeline Health Centre vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10193 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  11. ITAT Chennai · 13 May 2016
    ITAT - Partners’ remuneration allowable from income which was offered to tax as unexplained investment u/s 69.

    ITO. Vs. Roshan

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10192 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Section. 69

  12. ITAT Ahmedabad · 13 May 2016
    ITAT - Deeming provisions of Sec. 50C not applicable to transfer of rights in land as the same cannot be equated to land or building or both.

    Smt. Devindraben I. Barot Vs. Income Tax Officer

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10191 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section. 50C

  13. Delhi High Court · 13 May 2016
    HC - For AY 2001-02, no Sec 40(a)(i) disallowance to an Indian company for TDS default on payment to US company towards administrative fee.

    HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD.Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10190 (HC-DELHI) · Section. 40(a)(ia)

  14. ITAT Bangalore · 13 May 2016
    ITAT - Where delay in appeal-disposal was not attributable to assessee then stay can be granted beyond 365 days.

    Google India Private Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10189 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  15. Supreme Court · 13 May 2016
    SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be deleted on guise or pretence of legal opinion as a smokescreen and façade.

    N.G. TECHNOLOGIES (IN LIQUIDATION) Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10188 (SC)

  16. Supreme Court · 11 May 2016
    SC - Where requisite and due enquiries were not made during assessment proceedings, revision u/s 263 was justified.

    CIT. vs. Amitabh Bachchan

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10187 (SC)

  17. ITAT Bangalore · 11 May 2016
    ITAT - Amount received by foreign resident from its Indian affiliate under Management and Administration Services agreement constitutes royalty for supply of commercial information.

    TNT Express Worldwide (UK) Limited vs. DDIT (International Taxation)

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10186 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  18. Supreme Court · 10 May 2016
    SC - Rent can be said to have accrued or arisen only when a right to receive the same is vested in the assessee even in case of retrospective enhancement.

    P.G.& W.SAWOO PVT. LTD. Vs. ACIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10185 (SC)

  19. ITAT Chennai · 10 May 2016
    ITAT - Stock Appreciation Rights received by employee from US parent of an Indian company is taxable either as benefit in lieu of salary or as perquisite u/s 17.

    Shri Soundarrajan Parthasarathy Vs. DCIT

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10184 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  20. ITAT Mumbai · 10 May 2016
    ITAT - Absent PE in India, income arising to a Mauritian entity from installation and construction of off-shore platforms in India, not taxable.

    J. Ray Mc Dermott Eastern Hemisphere Ltd. Vs. ADIT (IT) 1(2)

    (2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10183 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.