Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,882 rulings

  1. Gujarat High Court · 09 May 2019
    HC - The assessee is the purchaser and not the seller and hence, the valuation adopted by the Stamp authority could not have been made the basis from coming to the conclusion that there is unexplained investment. u/s 69B.

    PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3 VERSUS DHARMAJA INFRASTRUCTURE

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19228 (HC-GUJARAT) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78609&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  2. Calcutta High Court · 09 May 2019
    HC - Tribunal was required either to accept the reasons and dismiss the appeal or not to accept it. If it did not accept the reasons, it was obliged to give its own reasons and dispose of the appeal.

    COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) VERSUS RAMA PRASAD GOENKA FOOTBALL ACADEMY

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19227 (HC-CALCUTTA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78611&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  3. Madras High Court · 08 May 2019
    Upheld the ITAT's order invoking Section 62(2) r.w.Sec. 61(1) which would apply only to the Revocable Transfer of the funds made for a period which is not specified and these above circumstances, it would be taxable in the hands of the Transferor/beneficiaries and not in the hands of the Trust.

    Tamilnadu Urban Development Fund Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19223 (HC-MADRAS)

  4. Uttarakhand High Court · 07 May 2019
    HC - ITAT erred in following jurisdictional HC full bench ruling on Sec. 234B interest levy.

    GIL Mauritius Holding Ltd Vs Director of Income Tax

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19216 (HC-UTTARAKHAND) · Section 234B

  5. Madras High Court · 07 May 2019
    HC - Revised returns filed by assessee companies pursuant to NCLT approved amalgamation beyond the prescribed time limit u/s. 139(5) are valid.

    Dalmia Power Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 1

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19215 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 139(5)

  6. ITAT Mumbai · 07 May 2019
    ITAT - Accommodation entries - Presumption of Section 132(4A) stood against the assessee and complete onus to negate the same was on assessee which has remain undischarged - Addition justified.

    RAJENDRA P. JAIN VERSUS DCIT-CENTRAL CIRCLE-1 (3), MUMBAI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19214 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=74995&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  7. ITAT Kolkata · 07 May 2019
    ITAT - Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Unless in the order u/s 147 the AO makes addition on the ‘foundational’ issue for which the reason was recorded, the AO is not permitted to make addition in respect of ‘any other issue’ for which reason was not recorded prior to issue of the notice.

    DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-12 (1) , KOLKATA VERSUS M/S. DOTEX MERCHANDISE PVT. LTD. AND (VICE-VERSA)

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19213 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=74996&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Kolkata · 07 May 2019
    ITAT - Information is not synonymous to truth - AO simply on the basis of the investigation report of DIT (Inv.) has jumped into conclusion that there is an escapement of income which is erroneous since it does not satisfy the jurisdictional fact and law for reopening as envisaged u/s. 147.

    SHRI UDIT KUMAR DUGAR VERSUS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-36 (4), KOLKATA

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19212 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=74997&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Kolkata · 07 May 2019
    ITAT - AO had made the enquiry or verification as required in the facts of the case to ascertain the applicability of section 2(22)(e) - Revision u/s 263 not valid.

    M/S. MANIPUR TEA CO. PVT. LIMITED VERSUS PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KOLKATA

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19211 (ITAT-KOLKATA) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=74998&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. Bombay High Court · 07 May 2019
    HC - Since assessee revised income voluntarily before he was confronted with the incorrect claim as original declaration of income suffered from a bonafide unintended error, no penalty u/s 271(1)(c).

    THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-18 VERSUS M/S. PADMINI TRUST

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19210 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78591&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  11. Bombay High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Grandfathering clause under amended India-Mauritius DTAA provides that the gain arising from sale of shares in an Indian Co. acquired on or before 31.3.2017, could not be taxed in India - AO's Sec. 197 order denying 'Nil' withholding tax certificate to assessee quashed.

    Indostar Capital Vs Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19209 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 197

  12. Bombay High Court · 02 May 2019
    HC - Exemption u/s 54F would be available on transfer of residential unit in Co-operative Housing Society which is constructed on a leased land.

    Shri Rahul Uday Tuljapurkar Vs Shri Rahul Uday Tuljapurkar

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19208 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section.54F

  13. ITAT Bangalore · 06 May 2019
    ITAT - Export commission paid to the non-residents for procuring orders as well as to coordinate and check the quality of goods constitutes FTS u/s 9(1)(vii) - Sec.40(a)(i) disallowance for TDS default upheld.

    Hical Infra Pvt. Ltd Vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19207 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

  14. Madras High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Reassessment u/s 147 - Return filed by the petitioner was not taken up for scrutiny initially, and only an intimation under Section 143(1) has been issued, it is of the view that the assumption of jurisdiction in this case cannot be faulted, particularly since the respondent has, in the reasons for re-opening, cited tangible material upon which he rests his belief of escapement of income.

    MR. DHIRAJ BHANSALI PARTNER, M/S. SHA RIKHABDAS MADAJI & CO VERSUS INCOME-TAX OFFICER, NON-CORPORATE WARD 6 (3), CHENNAI

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19206 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78579&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  15. Madras High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Re-assessment u/s 147 -Assessing Authority cannot have a mere re-appreciation of the same facts or a review of existing material on a mere change of opinion and take a different view of the matter and he is not permitted to undertake the re-assessment proceedings. - limitation of 4 years is a protection of whimsical and arbitrary re-assessment proceedings.

    DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX VERSUS VISVAS PROMOTERS (P) LTD.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19205 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78580&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  16. P&H High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Registration u/s 12AA - While considering registration u/s 12AA, the CIT(E) was required only to determine the objects of the society which undoubtedly were charitable in nature. - no substantial question of law arises

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS) , CHANDIGARH VERSUS M/S VISHWAYATAN YOGASHRAM

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19204 (HC-P&H) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78582&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  17. Madras High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Provisions of Section 45(4) would not be attracted on the retirement of the two partners and consequential allotment of their share in the assets in the Assessee Firm.

    M/S. NATIONAL COMPANY VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX BUSINESS CIRCLE – I [I/C] CHENNAI.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19203 (HC-MADRAS) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78583&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  18. Bombay High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC -Scope of amendment in 115JB by Finance Act, 2012 - Sub-­section 115JB as it stood prior to its amendment by virtue of Finance Act, 2012, would not be applicable to a banking company.

    THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-LTU, COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (IT) -3 VERSUS UNION BANK OF INDIA, MASHREQ BANK PSC, BANK OF INDIA, M/S THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD., CREDIT AGRICOLE CORPORATE AND INVESTMENT BANK

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19202 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78584&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  19. Bombay High Court · 06 May 2019
    HC - Stay of demand - Normal formula contained in CBDT circular of collecting 20% disputed tax pending appeal, cannot be applied in the present case - Directed to deposit 50% disputed tax.

    BHARAT J. PATEL. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4 (1) (1) & ORS.

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19201 (HC-BOMBAY) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=78586&Category=Judgment&CategoryType=Zip

  20. ITAT Delhi · 04 May 2019
    S. 14A Rule 8D disallowance of shares held as stock-in-trade: Though Maxopp Investment 402 ITR 640 (SC) rejects the theory of dominant purpose in making investment, it makes a clear distinction between dividend earned on shares acquired for controlling interest & shares purchased as stock-in-trade. In the case of the latter, it is only by a quirk of fate that the shares were held by the assessee when the dividend was declared. Accordingly, s. 14A & Rule 8D do not apply to shares held as stock-in-trade

    Nice Bombay Transport (P) Ltd vs. ACIT

    (2019) TaxCorp(LJ) 19200 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 14A

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.