-
There was no deliberate act on part of the assessee to conceal/furnish inaccurate particulars of income.
MS VARSHA JITENDRA TEKWANI VERSUS INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3 (1) (4) VADODARA
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28044 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94745&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
AO is directed to allow expenditure claimed in the profit & loss account.
DELHI AUTO AND GENERAL FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS DCIT, CIRCLE 7 (1), DELHI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28043 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94749&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Once resolution plan is approved a new claim cannot be raised by the revenue.
Murli Industries Limited Vs Asistant Commisioner of Income Tax
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28042 (HC-BOMBAY)
-
An undertaking, being the unit, which had already availed, before the commencement of the Special Economic Zones Act, 2005, the deductions referred to in section 10A for ten consecutive years, such unit shall not be eligible for deduction from income under this section.
M/S. CLASSIC LINENS INTERNATIONAL PVT. LTD. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, OSD, COMPANY RANGE-I, CHENNAI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28041 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94731&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Addition made by the A.O is being deleted.
SHRI ATHAVULLAH VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VELLORE.
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28040 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94732&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The property though purchased from four Vendors remains as a single property. Being so, the property has to be considered as a single property and deduction u/s. 54F should be granted.
NEELAVARA SANJEEVA RAO VERSUS THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7 (2) (1) , BANGALORE.
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28039 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94734&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
We do not find any reason to interfere or to deviate from the findings so recorded by the ld. CIT(A), accordingly, we uphold the same.
A.C.I.T., CENTRAL CIRCLE-2 (2) NAGPUR VERSUS M/S KARAN KOTHARI JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28038 (ITAT-NAGPUR) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94738&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The provisions of section 68 of the Act are not applicable in respect of addition in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.
M/S. JAGATI PUBLICATIONS LIMITED VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE 2 (1) HYDERABAD
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28037 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94740&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
We uphold the findings of the Ld. CIT(A) and find the grounds of appeal of the Revenue is devoid of any merits.
ITO, WARD-51 (3) , NEW DELHI VERSUS RAKESH RELAN, PROPRIETOR OF HB RELAN & CO.,
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28036 (ITAT-DELHI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94743&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
SCEO Bangalore: Mens rea is not a prerequisite for invocation of Section 276B.
Panacea Hospital Pvt Ltd Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28035 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 276B
-
Compensation to slum dwellers under consensus-based Court order will be an allowable expenditure and not a contingent liability.
Salient Traders Pvt. Ltd Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28034 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The bonus paid to the employees and the key management personnel was in the ordinary course of business and squarely allowable as deduction u/s 37 of the Act.
IDFC Capital Ltd Vs DCIT-14(2)(1)
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28033 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 37(1)
-
Assessee had proper reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B of the Act.
DCIT. CENT. CIR-7 (3), MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. SANATHNAGAR ENTERPRISES LTD., M/S. AJITNATH HI-TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD., M/S. LODHA GLOWING CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., M/S. LODHA PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28032 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94706&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Revenue erred in apportioning 10% to gross receipts as taxable income since Section 44BB do not override the provisions of Sections 4 and 5.
Petronash FZE Vs ADIT
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28026 (ITAT-DEHRADUN) · Section 44BB
-
Failure to follow the procedure u/s 144C(1) of the Act would be a jurisdictional error and not merely procedural error or a mere irregularity.
Shell India Markets Pvt Ltd Vs Aditional/Joint/Deputy/Asistant Commisioner of IncomeTax
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28019 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 144C (1)
-
It would be in the interest of justice to provide Assessee with an opportunity to file evidences as regards to amounts being offered to tax by the payees.
Ajay Kumar Singh Vs Income Tax Officer
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28018 (ITAT-DEHRADUN) · Section 40(a)(ia)
-
Section 53A of TPA to be not applicable to the joint development agreement.
Anugraha Shelters (P) Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28017 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 53A
-
Bank of India's excess contribution to superannuation fund is an admissible operative expenditure u/s 37(1).
Bank of India Vs The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28016 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 37(1)
-
Higher of the fair market value or value arrived at basis the valuation methodology has to be adopted for the purpose of Section 56(2)(viib).
Medicon Leather Pvt. Ltd Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28015 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 56(2)(viib)
-
Assessee’s wife was entitled to 500 grams of jewellery, source of which was presumed to be explained and thus, no addition for the same could be sustained.
Suresh Bansal Vs DCIT
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28014 (ITAT-DELHI)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.