Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,824 rulings

  1. ITAT Chandigarh · 30 Apr 2021
    The provision of section 11(1) which has been relied upon by the CIT(E) is only for the purpose of determining the income which qualifies for exemption u/s 11.

    Sarbat The Bhala Gurmat Mission Charitable Trust Vs The CIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29255 (ITAT-CHANDIGARH) · Section 12AA

  2. Madras High Court · 28 Apr 2021
    Assessee failed to prove any reasonable cause in failure to file the return of income within the specified date, even though there was taxable income.

    Dharampal R.Pandia Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income - Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29254 (HC-MADRAS) · Section 271(1)(c)

  3. Bombay High Court · 28 Apr 2021
    Assessment linked to third party's search and investigation, is not classifiable as a search case under VsV Act as prescribed by CBDT Circular no. 4/2021 dt. Mar 23, 2021 r.w.Circular 21/2020 dt. Dec 4, 2020.

    Bhupendra Harilal Mehta Vs Principal Commisioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29253 (HC-BOMBAY)

  4. Bombay High Court · 28 Apr 2021
    It would be incongruous to consider that uploading referred to in Clause 10 would mean all refunds arising are liable to be adjusted against the tax demands irrespective of orders thereon or subsisting instructions.

    Vrinda Sharad Bal Vs The Income Tax Oficer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29252 (HC-BOMBAY)

  5. ITAT Delhi · 27 Apr 2021
    There is no evidence that money lying in the bank account represent undisclosed income in terms of Sec. 5(1).

    Sh. Karamjit S. Jaiswal Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29251 (ITAT-DELHI)

  6. ITAT Delhi · 30 Apr 2021
    When assessee itself has classified its shares into investment portfolio, and had sold the shares in the relevant year itself after making substantial gain, then it cannot be held that assessee was not an investor but a share trader.

    Divya Shakti Trading Services Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29250 (ITAT-DELHI)

  7. ITAT Mumbai · 03 May 2021
    Under these circumstances, there seems to be no basis, except for surmises and conjectures, to suggest that the company is not wholly managed or controlled from the UAE.

    Interworld Shipping Agency LLC Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29249 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  8. ITAT Mumbai · 03 May 2021
    TDS could not contemplated by the Assessee at the time of share purchase and interest u/s 201(1A) could not be charged as interest need be given same treatment as given to the principal sum.

    WNS Capital Investment Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29248 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  9. ITAT Pune · 03 May 2021
    If the disallowance is to be restricted to the amount of exempt income, the sequitur is that there can never be any disallowance u/s 14A in the absence of positive exempt income for the year.

    Kumar Properties and Real Estate Private Limited Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29247 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 23(5)

  10. Madras High Court · 03 May 2022
    Revenue had tangible material to reopen the income tax assessment and the same was legally done as per the provisions of Section 147 of the Income Tax Act by issuing a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act.

    Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt. Ltd Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29246 (HC-MADRAS)

  11. ITAT Delhi · 30 Apr 2021
    Assessee has rightly deducted the tax @ 10% as per provisions contained under DTAA and Sec. 206AA cannot have overriding effect on DTAA, and therefore, no demand is payable by the assessee.

    Air India Limited Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29245 (ITAT-DELHI)

  12. ITAT Indore · 30 Apr 2021
    Revenue failed to prove that the alleged surrender for Rs.225 lakh was given with regard to a specific transaction.

    Virasha Infrastructure Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29244 (ITAT-INDORE)

  13. ITAT Hyderabad · 29 Apr 2021
    AO is directed to allow exemption to assessee u/s 11 and delete the addition made on account of unaccounted FDs and disallowance made u/s 40(a)(ia).

    Nalgonda Diocese Social Service Society Vs Income-tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29243 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 11

  14. Delhi High Court · 03 Jun 2022
    HC - If the revenue has not challenged the correctness of the law laid down by the High Court and has accepted it in the case of one assessee, then it is not open to the revenue to challenge its correctness in the case of other assessee without just cause.

    Tata Teleservices Ltd Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) -2

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29236 (HC-DELHI)

  15. ITAT Jaipur · 30 Apr 2021
    ITAT - Prior period expenses are duly allowable in the hands of assessee as settled during the year and in any case, there are no changes in the tax rates and thus, no prejudice is caused to the revenue.

    Soni Hospitals Pvt. Ltd. Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29235 (ITAT-JAIPUR)

  16. Bombay High Court · 29 Apr 2021
    HC - Section cannot be interpreted to mean that for the Pr. CIT to exercise powers of revision u/s 264, not only that the time for filing the appeal should have expired but also that the assessee should have waived his right of appeal - Thus, once assessee chooses not to file appeal and time limit expires, waiver of right to file is not required for Pr. CIT to accept the application.

    Aafreen Fatima Fazal Abbas Sayed Vs Asistant Commisioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29234 (HC-BOMBAY) · Section 264

  17. ITAT Delhi · 29 Apr 2021
    ITAT - Penalty u/s 271AAA levied on ad-hoc addition based on average gross profit rate unsustainable.

    Ace Steel Fab (P) Ltd Vs Dy.CIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29233 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 271AAA

  18. ITAT Chennai · 07 May 2022
    ITAT - New unit set up to expand business by manufacturing identical goods, enter new markets, and benefit from new tax regime, not to be termed as established by splitting or reconstructing of existing unit of the Assessee - Eligible for deduction u/s 80IC.

    Pool Thevar Marimuthu Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29232 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Section 80IC

  19. ITAT Mumbai · 07 May 2022
    ITAT - Levy of penalty by no means could be construed as an addition within the meaning of clause 10(e) of the CBDT circular no.3 of 2018 - Revenue’s appeal not maintainable, as the tax effect was below the monetary limit prescribed by CBDT Circular No.17/2019.

    Stripco Springs Pvt Ltd Vs ITO- 13(2)(4)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29231 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  20. ITAT Bangalore · 05 May 2022
    ITAT - Since rental income, both from property as well as equipment let out are separately identifiable in the lease agreements, rentals from letting out factory building is taxable under the head house property and not under IFOS.

    Vectra Advanced Engineering Private Limited Vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29230 (ITAT-BANGALORE)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.