Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,819 rulings

  1. ITAT Delhi · 01 Oct 2022
    Assessee does not constitute a dependent agent of Car Care Private Ltd., on the ground that privity of contract for extended warranty is between the Assessee and the customers, wherein, CCPL has no role to play and the factual position emerging on record was not effectively controverted by Revenue.

    Exclusive Motors Pvt. Ltd Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30177 (ITAT-DELHI)

  2. ITAT Mumbai · 01 Oct 2022
    Assessee furnished various documents including cash book and bank statements for the whole year to explain the nature and source of cash deposits and three of the customers from whom amount was claimed to have been received by Assessee appeared before the Revenue confirming the payment.

    Jet Freight Logistics Limited Vs Commissioner of Income Tax Appeal (NFAC)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30176 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  3. ITAT Delhi · 01 Oct 2022
    A warrant issued in respect of one premises cannot be valid to search another premises and if the authorities intend to search another premise, they will have to issue another warrant after recording satisfaction in accordance with law and absence of the same would vitiate the proceedings under Section 153A.

    M3M India Holdings Vs The A.C.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30175 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 153A

  4. Kerala High Court · 01 Oct 2022
    Since the term or set off of any loss was specifically inserted only by the Finance Act 2016, w.e.f. Apr 1, 2017 an assessee is entitled to claim set-off of loss against income determined under Section 115BBE till AY 2016-17.

    Bhima Jewellers Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30174 (HC-KERALA) · Section 115BBE

  5. ITAT Mumbai · 01 Oct 2022
    The interest income derived by a co-operative society by way of investment made with a co-operative bank is eligible for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

    Palm Court M Premises Cooperative Society Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Income tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30173 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 80P

  6. Calcutta High Court · 30 Sep 2022
    The limitation being a question of law and touching upon the jurisdiction of the authority to initiate proceedings, it could be raised at any stage of the proceedings and it will not preclude the assessee from doing so.

    Dinesh Kumar Goyal Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30166 (HC-CALCUTTA)

  7. ITAT Mumbai · 30 Sep 2022
    The ITAT has inherent powers of granting a stay on demand in fit and deserving cases, which is ancillary and incidental to its appellate powers.

    Hindustan Lever Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30165 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  8. ITAT Delhi · 30 Sep 2022
    The assessment order as invalid and deemed to have never been issued as it failed to mention DIN in its body.

    Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd Vs The Dy. C.I.T

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30164 (ITAT-DELHI)

  9. ITAT Mumbai · 29 Sep 2022
    Even if Assessee’s income remained Nil after the adjustments, such adjustments constitutes as requisite variation in the income returned by Assessee under Section 144C.

    J. P. Morgan India Investment Company Mauritius Limited Vs ACIT-3(1)(1)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30157 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  10. ITAT Delhi · 29 Sep 2022
    Receipt from domain name registration received by GoDaddy.com LLC is in the nature of royalty under Section 9(1)(vi) read with Section 115A.

    Godaddy.com LLC Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30156 (ITAT-DELHI)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 29 Sep 2022
    The book value of the liability shown in the balance sheet has to be reduced for the purpose of valuation and determination of FMV of unquoted equity shares.

    Mystical Infaratech Pvt. Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30155 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 56(2)(viia)

  12. Forein High Court · 28 Sep 2022
    Danish Tax Council: The MD does not have any operative role in the subsidiary nor any premises in the subsidiary, thus it can be safely concluded that the MD would not be directly involved in the Assessee’s activities in Denmark.

    NA Vs Foreign Court Denmark

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30148 (HC-Forein)

  13. Delhi High Court · 28 Sep 2022
    Wherever the date of despatch or issuance is determined to be on or after Apr 1, 2021, the reassessment notices shall be deemed to be show cause notices under Section 148A(b) of the new regime.

    Suman Jeet Agarwal & Ors Vs INCOME TAX OFFICER

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30147 (HC-DELHI) · Section 13

  14. ITAT Delhi · 28 Sep 2022
    In the absence of any definition of 'debenture' in the Act, reliance can be placed on the definition given in the Companies Act which provides that 'bond' is covered under the expression debenture.

    Heidelberg Cement AG Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30146 (ITAT-DELHI)

  15. Delhi High Court · 27 Sep 2022
    When the requisite materials and the intervening decision of the jurisdictional high court was available for deciding the issue urged by the Assessee, the Tribunal ought to have arrived at a conclusion rather than remanding the matter back.

    Vedanta Limited Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30145 (HC-DELHI)

  16. ITAT Pune · 27 Sep 2022
    Settlement of dispute under Vivad se Vishwas Act (VsV Act) does not amount to conceding to the dispute for AYs not subject matter of declaration under VsV Act.

    Phadnis Clinic Pvt. Ltd Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30144 (ITAT-PUNE)

  17. ITAT Hyderabad · 26 Sep 2022
    Mere projections by the assessee and accepted by the auditors with qualifications cannot be considered as a proper valuation and especially when the auditors have qualified the report.

    Quark Enterprises Private Limited Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30136 (ITAT-HYDERABAD) · Section 56(2)(viib)

  18. ITAT Chennai · 24 Sep 2022
    The Assessee is not entitled for depreciation on plant & machinery as the assets had not been put to use in its business.

    PVP Ventures Ltd. Vs The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30130 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  19. ITAT Mumbai · 24 Sep 2022
    Asssessee is directed to show the identity and creditworthiness of the subscribers of the share capital to examine the genuineness of the transaction.

    Glowshine Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30129 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 68

  20. ITAT Mumbai · 24 Sep 2022
    Rule 128(9) provides that the statement in Form No. 67 and shall be furnished on or before the due date specified for furnishing the return of income under Section 139(1).

    Sonakshi Sinha Vs Commissioner of Income- tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30128 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.