Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

Direct Tax landmark rulings

15,819 rulings

  1. ITAT Chennai · 05 Nov 2022
    The provisional approval granted by the Revenue for claiming exemption under Section 80G is applicable from the beginning of AY in which application was made and not from the date on which provisional approval was granted.

    NSR Charitable Trust Vs The PCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30366 (ITAT-CHENNAI) · Section 80G

  2. ITAT Chennai · 05 Nov 2022
    Penalty of Rs. 1.5 Lac levied by Revenue under Section 271B is being deletd.

    Perfect Stone Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30365 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  3. Delhi High Court · 04 Nov 2022
    Death of the Managing Director of the companies was an extraordinary and exceptional event which would render non-grant of relief on equitable consideration irrational.

    I A Housing Solution Private Limited Vs PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30358 (HC-DELHI)

  4. ITAT Chennai · 04 Nov 2022
    The observation of the AO is nothing, but a suspicion, because as claimed by the AO, the sales declared by the assessee for the AY 2017-18, is not increased when compared to last Financial Year.

    Asokan Meena Vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30357 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  5. ITAT Chennai · 04 Nov 2022
    Services rendered by marketing partner in terms of agreement was in the nature of FTS and in absence of tax deduction at source, the expenditure was liable to be disallowed under Section 40(a)(i).

    Sunsmart Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30356 (ITAT-CHENNAI)

  6. ITAT Ahmedabad · 03 Nov 2022
    There is no requirement that the goods to be eligible for scrap should be produced by the seller itself.

    Umeshkuamr Harilal Shah Vs ITO(TDS)-3

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30349 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD)

  7. Delhi High Court · 03 Nov 2022
    There is no requirement that there has to be formal order of condonation of delay to enable Assessee to avail benefit of VsV Act.

    Medeor Hospital Limited Vs PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30348 (HC-DELHI)

  8. Supreme Court · 03 Nov 2022
    The judgment, has to be understood in the context, which is that they apply for the assessment years in question, which were before this court and were decided.

    Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30347 (SC)

  9. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Nov 2022
    Assessee being a non-resident can only be asked to file the details with respect to the income falling under Section 5(2).

    Manish Vjay Mehta Vs The DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30346 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  10. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Nov 2022
    Mere pendency of appeal against a binding judicial precedent, in a higher judicial forum does not dilute, curtail or otherwise narrow down its binding nature.

    Luxora Infrastructure Pvt Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30345 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  11. ITAT Mumbai · 02 Nov 2022
    If Revenue once allowed the deduction for the depreciation, then it is debarred to reject the depreciation claim in the subsequent year on the WDV carried forward from the earlier AY.

    Man Industries (India) Limited Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30344 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  12. Madras High Court · 01 Nov 2022
    Notices under Sections 143(2) and 144C stand on a different footing and cannot be equated with a SCN/DAO, to be issued prior to completion of faceless assessment.

    P.T.Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker Trust Vs The Income Tax Officer

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30337 (HC-MADRAS)

  13. ITAT Mumbai · 01 Nov 2022
    In the hierarchical judicial system that we have, the better wisdom of the Court below has to yield to the higher wisdom of the Court above.

    Wockhardt Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30336 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 144C

  14. ITAT Mumbai · 31 Oct 2022
    There must exist a fixed place of business in India through which the business is carried out in India whereas it is not even the case that any particular premises were at the disposal of the Assessee.

    RGA International Reinsurance Company Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30329 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  15. Madras High Court · 31 Oct 2022
    Unless a contribution is made gratuitously and without consideration, it cannot be treated as voluntary contributions for the purpose of exemption of tax under Sections 11 and 12.

    MAC Public Charitable Trust Vs Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30328 (HC-MADRAS)

  16. Bombay High Court · 31 Oct 2022
    The case of the petitioner on financial stringency is not at all considered in the perspective it ought to have been considered by the Principal Commissioner, after applying his mind to the specific plea as taken by the petitioners in that regard.

    Tungabhadra Minerals Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30327 (HC-BOMBAY)

  17. Supreme Court · 31 Oct 2022
    No error has been committed by the ITAT or HC in deciding the chargeability of TDS where value of non-convertible debentures and fixed deposit was less than Rs.5,000.

    Jai Prakash Associates Ltd Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30326 (SC)

  18. ITAT Delhi · 29 Oct 2022
    If a person receives donation and maintains the record of identity and address of donors, then such donations cannot be considered to be anonymous donation as defined in Section 115BBC.

    Gian Sagar Educational & Charitable Trust Vs The DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30320 (ITAT-DELHI) · Sections 68, 115BBC

  19. ITAT Mumbai · 29 Oct 2022
    There is no dispute on Assessee's entitlement for the benefit of exemption under Article 13(4) of the DTAA in respect of short/long term capital gains.

    Swiss Finance Corporation (Mauritius), Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30319 (ITAT-MUMBAI)

  20. Delhi High Court · 28 Oct 2022
    The absence of registration of the assignment under the Trademark Act, 1999 does not disentitle the Assessee from asserting ownership in a trademark.

    Daikin Shri Ram Aircon Pvt Ltd Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 30318 (HC-DELHI)

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.