-
Mumbai ITAT Upholds Depreciation Claim on Non-Compete Fees Allocated Post-Demerger to Network 18 Media, in Line with Prior Acceptance in Ushodaya Enterprises Case
Panorama Television Pvt. Ltd. (Now Known as Network 18 Media & Investments Ltd.) Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38590 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Interest on Delayed TDS and Employee Contribution Disallowed as Deduction; Interest on Late Deposit of Indirect Taxes Permitted under Section 37(1)
Pure Spiritss Limited (Formerly K D Liquor Pvt. Ltd.) Vs ACIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38589 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
-
ITAT Bangalore Upholds Dismissal of Rectification Plea: No Apparent Error in Stay Order Despite Alleged AO Violation and Recovery of Rs. 205.90 Crore
Cisco Systems Inc Vs DCIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38588 (ITAT-BANGALORE)
-
Surat ITAT Holds Pre-Transfer Land Cost Eligible for Section 54F Exemption: Revenue’s Appeal Dismissed on Grounds of Pragmatic Statutory Interpretation
Damodar Bhimjibhai Patel Vs The DCIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38587 (ITAT-SURAT)
-
Mumbai ITAT Invalidates Reassessment under Section 147 for Failure to Pass Speaking Order on Objections: Jurisdictional Defect Uncured by Subsequent Enquiry
Next Technologies (India) Private Limited Vs ACIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38586 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 147
-
Mumbai ITAT Affirms LTCG Treatment for Redeveloped Flat Sale: Period of Holding Calculated From Original Acquisition, Not PAAA Execution
Rajesh Shamji Furia Vs ITO
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38585 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Section 56(2)(x) Inapplicable on Redevelopment—Exchange of Tenancy Rights for Alternate Accommodation Constitutes Valid Consideration
Manoj Devshichhadva Vs ITO
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38584 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 56(2)(x)
-
Mumbai ITAT Clarifies Expatriate Salary Deduction: Section 44C Inapplicable to Standard Chartered Bank’s Indian Branch; Allowance Upheld Under Section 37(1) and Article 7 of India-UK DTAA
Standard Chartered Bank Vs DCIT(IT)
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38583 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 44C
-
Delhi ITAT Orders Fresh Inquiry into Taxability of Automated Technical Services under India-Ireland DTAA: Distinction Between ‘Technical Services’ and ‘Royalty’ Reaffirmed
SFDC Ireland Ltd Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38582 (ITAT-DELHI)
-
Delhi High Court Rules Penalty Notice under Section 271(1)(c) Must Clearly Specify Concealment or Inaccurate Particulars: Revenue’s Appeal Dismissed
Vitasta Estates Vs PCIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38566 (HC-DELHI)
-
Subhash Chander Mittal Vs Union of Other
Subhash Chander Mittal Vs Union of Other
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38567 (HC-P&H) · Section 89(1)(a)
-
Mumbai ITAT Confirms Section 44C Cap on NRI Desk Expenses for Bank of Bahrain; Disallows Full Deduction Under Section 37(1) by Treating Overheads as Head Office Expenditure
Bank Of Bahrain & Kuwait B.S.C. Vs The ACIT
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38568 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 44C
-
ITAT Mumbai Rules Sponsorship Receipts from "Pinkathon" Not Taxable as Business Income: Charitable Nature Upheld Despite Magnitude of Funds and Promotional Benefits
United Sisters Foundation Vs ITO
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38569 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 13(8)
-
Mumbai ITAT Nullifies Penalty for Non-Compliance with Section 44AB, Recognizes Bona Fide Belief Regarding GST Exclusion from Turnover Threshold
Manish Pushkar Dayal Singhal Vs ITO
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38570 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 44AB
-
Mumbai ITAT Directs AO to Re-examine US LP’s Status as ‘Company’ under India-US DTAA for Loss Carry Forward Eligibility
Pabrai Investment Fund IV, L.P. Vs Asst. Director of Income Tax
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38571 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Ahmedabad ITAT Quashes Section 68 Addition: No Unexplained Income Where Cash Sales and Deposits During Demonetization Duly Accounted by Cloth Trader
Pravinkumar D Gandhi HUF Vs Income Tax Officer
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38572 (ITAT-AHMEDABAD) · Section 68
-
Mumbai ITAT Denies Condonation for 6-Year Delay in Filing Cross Objections by Mashreq Bank: Subsequent Favourable Ruling Not a Sufficient Cause
Mashreq Bank PSC Vs DDIT(IT)4(1)
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38573 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Bangalore ITAT Affirms Deductibility of Success Fee Paid for Advisory Services in Share Sale under Section 48
Mohan Rajashekar Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38574 (ITAT-BANGALORE) · Section 48
-
Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue's Appeal Condoning 156-Day Delay Owing to Bona Fide Administrative Lapses, Emphasizes Liberal Approach to Limitation under Section 260A
JS Capital LLC Vs The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38575 (HC-BOMBAY)
-
Delhi ITAT Quashes Section 270A Penalty: Bona Fide and Debatable TDS Interpretation on Payments to GNOIDA Not Sufficient for Under-Reporting of Income
Royalgolf Link City Projects Vs Income Tax Office
(2026) TaxCorp(LJ) 38576 (ITAT-DELHI) · Section 270A
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.