-
Judgement pronounced and dictated in open court, However Judge entitled to recalled or reviewed verdict until judgement is signed & sealed - SC Larger Bench
Kushalbhai Ratanbhai Rohit vs. State of Gujarat
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3295 (SC)
-
Revised SC guideline in Cheque Bounce Cases U/s. Section 138 (NI Act)
Indian Bank Association and Others v. Union of India
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3276 (SC)
-
Important principles on distinction between “contract for sale of goods” and “works contract” explained
Kone Elevator India Pvt. Ltd vs. State of T. N
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3274 (SC)
-
Despite pronouncement of verdict in open court & signing of draft judgement, Judge entitled to alter verdict until judgement is signed & sealed
Kushalbhai Ratanbhai Rohit vs. State of Gujarat
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3273 (SC)
-
Sale proceeds of the scrap
Commnr. of Income Tax vs Punjab Stainless Steel Industries
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3263 (SC) · S. 80HHC
-
SC dismissed SLP
KIRAN DEVI vs CIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3261 (SC) · S. 271(1)(c), 153 C, 139, 148
-
Discretionary Trust or Specific Trusts - Merely because the Settlor and after his death, his son did not exercise their power to appoint the discretion exercisers, the character of the subject trusts does not get altered. The discretionary trust is equally applicable to the controversy under the Wealth Tax Act. The value of the assets cannot be assessed on the estate of the deceased Settlor.
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX vs ESTATE OF LATE HMM VIKRAMSINHJI OF GONDAL
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3258 (SC)
-
Section 72A meant for Companies, No such provision which would permit the amalgamating co-operative society to carry forward and adjust such losses against the profits of the amalgamated co-operative society.
Rajasthan R S S & Ginning Mills FED. Ltd vs DCIT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3245 (SC)
-
Deal with the misuse of Public Interest Litigation with iron hand – SC
JAIPUR SHAHAR HINDU VIKAS SAMITI TR.PRES Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN TR.CHIEF SEC.& ORS.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3208 (SC)
-
Pvt firms including telecom Companies come in CAG ambit – SC
ASSO.OF UNIFIED TELE.SERV.PROV.& ORS. Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3207 (SC)
-
SC grants recognition to transgenders / Eunuchs as third gender
National Legal Services Authority Versus Union of India
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3205 (SC)
-
Govt woman employee can get uninterrupted 2-yr leave for child care – SC
Kakali Ghosh Versus Chief Secretary
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3204 (SC)
-
S. 244A: Deductor entitled to interest on refund of excess TDS from date of payment
UOI vs. Tata Chemicals Ltd.
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3196 (SC) · S. 244A
-
A charitable and religious trust which does not benefit any specific religious community is not hit by s. 13(1)(b) & is eligible to claim exemption u/s 11
CIT vs. M/s Dawoodi Bohara Jamat
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3194 (SC) · S. 13(1)(b)
-
S. 158BC/ 158BD: Law on how & when “satisfaction” has to be recorded by AO to attain jurisdiction over non-searched person explained
CIT vs. Calcutta Knitwears
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 3185 (SC) · S. 158BC, 158BD
-
Satisfaction note issuance u/s 158BD - scope and possible interpretation of Section 158BD - “Satisfaction” has to be recorded by AO to attain jurisdiction over non-searched person - (a) at the time of or along with the initiation of proceedings against the searched person under Section 158BC of the Act; (b) along with the assessment proceedings under Section 158BC of the Act; and (c) immediately after the assessment proceedings are completed under Section 158BC of the Act of the searched person.
CIT vs Calcutta Knitwears
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2726 (SC) · Income Tax Section 158BD, 158BD and Chapter XIV-B
-
Legal profession is not business or trade – SC
DHANRAJ SINGH CHOUDAHRY VERSUS NATHULAL VISHWAKARMA
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2704 (SC)
-
Section 23 of NDPS Act not applies to transport of Indian ganja – SC
Union of India Versus Sheo Shambhu Giri
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2703 (SC)
-
It is only the objects of a trust as declared in the trust deed which would govern its right of exemption under Section 11 or 12.
CIT vs DAWOODI BOHARA JAMAT
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2695 (SC) · Income Tax Section 11,12, 13(1)(b)
-
Provident Fund – Interest under Section 7Q of the Act for belated remittances - Supreme Court upheld that 7Q dues regarding imposition of Interest for belated remittance under the Act is not appealable before the Tribunal, if EPF Authority passes an independent order laiming interest separately under section 7Q from that of 7A dues.
Arcot Textile Mills Ltd. vs The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and others
(2014) TaxCorp(LJ) 2692 (SC)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.