-
SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had held that no addition could be made in the block assessment proceedings for want of undisclosed income.
Shibu Soren vs. CIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10790 (SC)
-
SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had disallowed provision for loss on transit-breakages absent scientific basis to determine the amount of provision.
Seagram Distilleries (P) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10671 (SC)
-
SC - SLP Granted - Taxability of lease-line charges reimbursement
DIT. vs. WNS Global Services (UK) Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10663 (SC)
-
SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had held that mere sending of pre-printed notice with all ground mentioned not sufficient to levy penalty.
CIT. vs. Veerbhadrappa Sangappa & Co.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10654 (SC)
-
SC - Subsidy by way of refund of excise duty and interest for setting up new industrial undertaking is a capital receipt.
CIT. vs. Shree Balaji Alloys
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10606 (SC)
-
Subsidy by way of refund of excise duty and interest for setting up a new industrial undertaking is a capital receipt & not taxable as income. Alternatively, such receipts are "derived" from the industrial undertaking and are deductible u/s 80-IB
CIT vs. Shree Balaji Alloys
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10576 (SC) · Section 80-IB
-
Entire law on assessment of shipping companies under the "Tonnage Tax" Scheme in Chapter XIIG of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in the context of "slot charters" explained
CIT vs. Trans Asian Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10573 (SC)
-
Interest paid for broken period should not be considered as part of the purchase price, but should be allowed as revenue expenditure in the year of purchase of securities. American Express vs. CIT 258 ITR 601 (Bom) affirmed, Vijaya Bank 187 ITR 541 (SC) distinguished
CIT vs. CitiBank N.A.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10571 (SC)
-
SC - Assessee’s appeal admitted against HC-order declining intervention by way of writ to quash notices u/s 148.
Adobe Systems Software Ireland Ltd. vs. Asstt. Director Of Income Tax
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10287 (SC)
-
SC - Where assessee was ceased to be a sick industrial undertaking, IT Department to take steps for recovery of tax.
DGIT vs. GTC Industries Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10251 (SC)
-
SC - Assessee is entitled to interest u/s 244(1A) on refund utilised by the revenue against outstanding tax demand.
CIT. vs. Jyotsna Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10238 (SC)
-
SC - Assessment order valid even though passed beyond limitation period of two years prescribed u/s 153 as ssessment pendency before IAC to be excluded from limitation period.
CIT. vs. Saurashtra Cement & Chem. Industries Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10217 (SC)
-
SC - SLP Dismissed - HC had held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) cannot be deleted on guise or pretence of legal opinion as a smokescreen and façade.
N.G. TECHNOLOGIES (IN LIQUIDATION) Vs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10188 (SC)
-
SC - Where requisite and due enquiries were not made during assessment proceedings, revision u/s 263 was justified.
CIT. vs. Amitabh Bachchan
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10187 (SC)
-
SC - Rent can be said to have accrued or arisen only when a right to receive the same is vested in the assessee even in case of retrospective enhancement.
P.G.& W.SAWOO PVT. LTD. Vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10185 (SC)
-
S. 5/ 147: Even if income by way of rent is enhanced with retrospective effect, it accrues only when a right to receive the income is vested in the assessee. A notice u/s 148 seeking to assessee the income prior to its accrual is without jurisdiction
P.G. & W. Sawoo Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10179 (SC) · Sections 5, 147
-
SC - SLP dismissed - HC was justified in deleting interest levied u/s 234A/B/C as Revenue had failed to adjust seized cash.
CIT. vs. Sunil Chandra Gupta
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10167 (SC) · Secton. 234A/B/C
-
SC - HC justified in excluding period for which interim stay against special audit direction u/s 142(2A) was in operation for counting period of limitation for passing block assessment order.
VLS Finance Limited Vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10157 (SC)
-
S. 15, 17, 192: Concept of "salary" explained. Held that as "tips" are paid to employees of the assessee from an outsider on a voluntary basis and the employees have no vested right to receive the same, the same is not "salary" and the assessee has no obligation to deduct TDS
ITC Limited vs. CIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10149 (SC) · Sections 15, 17, 192
-
SC - TDS u/s 192 on salaries is not applicable on payment of tips by assessee hotel to its staff/waiters.
ITC LIMITED GURGAON Vs COMMISSIONER OF I.T. (TDS) DELHI
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10147 (SC)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.