Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

ITAT Pune — Direct Tax

416 rulings

  1. ITAT Pune · 08 Feb 2022
    Since the assessee did not put to use the two projects under consideration, the interest thereon was required to be capitalized, which was not eligible for deduction u/s. 36(1)(iii).

    ACIT, CIRCLE-6 PUNE VERSUS SILVER JUBILEE MOTORS LTD.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28331 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95478&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  2. ITAT Pune · 03 Feb 2022
    Assessee is entitled to the depreciation under the provisions of section 32 of the Act inspite of the fact that the vehicle is registered in the name of the director of the appellant company.

    SEHGAL AUTORIDERS PVT. LTD. VERSUS DCIT, CIRCLE-10 PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28306 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95355&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  3. ITAT Pune · 02 Feb 2022
    Provision of section 2(22)(e) of the Act have no application to the facts of the case, there is no necessity to deal with the other contentions raised on behalf of the assessee.

    SHRI JITENDRA KAPILDEO GUPTA, M/S. SUBU CHEM PVT. LTD. VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 6, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28293 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95329&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  4. ITAT Pune · 04 Jun 2021
    Mere doubt cannot lead to revision of assessment order unless shown that AO failed to apply his mind, or that his view was wrong in facts or law.

    Shivratan Shrigopal Mundada Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28273 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 54F

  5. ITAT Pune · 29 Jan 2022
    When all the documents and explanations from the Assessee have been scrutinized and examined by the AO, the assessment cannot be said to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue.

    Shergil Harjit Vs Pr. CIT-1

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28267 (ITAT-PUNE)

  6. ITAT Pune · 11 Jun 2021
    The amendment of Finance Act, 2014 is prospective and applicable w.e.f. April 1, 2015.

    Prima Private Limited Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28246 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 54EC

  7. ITAT Pune · 22 Jan 2022
    When all the explanations and documents from the assessee have been scrutinized and examined by the Assessing Officer in such scenario the order of the assessment cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of the revenue.

    SHERGIL HARJIT VERSUS PR. CIT-1, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28216 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95160&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Pune · 12 Jan 2022
    We uphold the order of the ld. CIT(A), as we do not find merit in the appeal filed by the assessee.

    M/S. ARUN SHINDE VERSUS ITO, WARD-3 (3) , PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28148 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94956&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Pune · 07 Jan 2022
    Disallowance cannot be made solely on the ground that the vouchers are self-made and thus are bogus in nature.

    Mercedez-Benz India Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28121 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 35AB

  10. ITAT Pune · 01 Jan 2022
    When we peruse the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment in the present case of the assessee as recorded by the Assessing Officer, we find that there is no scope for any hypothetical or any contingency in the given reasoning.

    SHRI RAVI PICHAYA, DIRECTOR IN HEXTECH ENGINEERS INDIA PVT. LTD. VERSUS THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, NASHIK

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28053 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94790&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  11. ITAT Pune · 23 Dec 2021
    ITAT - Payment to AE in Belgium for using the IT Infrastructure facility falls within the ambit of royalty u/s 9(1)(vi) as also under Article 12 of India- Belgium DTAA - Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) for TDS default justified.

    Bekaert Industries Private Limited Vs DCIT

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27998 (ITAT-PUNE)

  12. ITAT Pune · 10 Dec 2021
    Mere admission u/s 132(4) cannot form the basis of addition.

    ISMT Limited Vs ACIT

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27911 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 132(4)

  13. ITAT Pune · 08 Nov 2021
    ITAT - The AO recommending a revision u/s 263 to the CIT has no statutory sanction and is a course of action unknown to the law

    Alfa Laval Lund AB Vs CIT(IT/TP)

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27617 (ITAT-PUNE)

  14. ITAT Pune · 14 Oct 2021
    ITAT - No appeal against draft assessment order also consequences flowing from the wrong mentioning of the section in the draft order cannot legally validate the appeal filed against the draft order.

    Sandvik Mining and Construction Tools AB Vs ACIT

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27418 (ITAT-PUNE)

  15. ITAT Pune · 02 Oct 2021
    ITAT - In absence of PE in India, software license-fee not taxable as business profits and also not taxable as Royalty.

    Husco International Inc. Vs ACIT (IT)

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27364 (ITAT-PUNE)

  16. ITAT Pune · 27 Sep 2021
    ITAT - The waiver of loan in the earlier year has no impact either on the actual cost u/s 43(1) or the w.d.v. u/s 43(6) for the year under consideration. Depreciation has to be allowed on the w.d.v. of the block of Machinery at the gross value without reducing the waiver of loan therefrom.

    Shapers India Private Limited Vs DCIT

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27329 (ITAT-PUNE)

  17. ITAT Pune · 27 Aug 2021
    ITAT - The term activities u/s 12A in the provision includes proposed activities.

    Arare Foundation Vs The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27103 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 12AA

  18. ITAT Pune · 27 Aug 2021
    ITAT - Quasi-Judicial Authorities are required to substantiate every addition made with proper reasoning and that reason should come out from the orders of the authorities itself as such ad hoc disallowance of commission to technically skilled liaison representatives is not justified.

    Cooper Corporation Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 27100 (ITAT-PUNE)

  19. ITAT Pune · 30 Jul 2021
    There is no scope for any guess work or surmises or any hypothetical situation for imposing penalty u/s.271(1)(c).

    THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, AURANGABAD VERSUS M/S. BG LI IN ELECTRICALS LTD., M/S. BMR HVAC LTD.

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 26959 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=90983&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. ITAT Pune · 10 Jul 2021
    AO is not empowered to substitute the agreed consideration by Fair Market Value except in situations envisaged u/s 50C of the Act.

    AMIT VISHNU PASHANKAR, VISHNU PUNDALIK PASHANKAR, MAHESH VISHNU PASHANKAR VERSUS THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 2, SANGLI., THE DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 3, PUNE.

    (2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 26877 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=90622&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.