Search
Advanced Search Search with field filters
/adv
Navigation
Home Go to homepage
/home
Direct Tax Income Tax resources
GST GST Acts, Rules & Case Laws
Company Law Companies Act & SEBI
Due Date Tracker Statutory compliance deadlines
/due
Due Date Calendar Calendar view of compliance deadlines
Daily Digest Today's tax updates and articles
/digest
Landmark Rulings

ITAT Pune — Direct Tax

383 rulings

  1. ITAT Pune · 14 May 2022
    Assessee’s claim under Section 80-IA(4) was allowed by the Revenue in flagrant violation of Section 80(5) and the assessment order passed was contrary to the plain provisions of the Act.

    Mahavir Civil Engineering Vs PCIT (Central)

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 29073 (ITAT-PUNE) · Sections 80-IA, 80(5)

  2. ITAT Pune · 07 Apr 2022
    The activity of CD writing was done at the Parwanoo unit for transfer to the Pune unit has been recorded at more than its market value as against the mandate of Section 80IA(8).

    Biz Secure Labs Pvt. Ltd Vs DCIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28784 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 80-IC

  3. ITAT Pune · 02 Apr 2022
    Merely because the prescribed Audit Report in Form No. 56F was not filed in the return of income, denial of claim under Section 10A was erroneous.

    Clarion Technologies Pvt. Ltd Vs Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28751 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 10A

  4. ITAT Pune · 26 Mar 2022
    No rental income can be said to have accrued to the Assessee from unsold flats either as stock in trade or under income from house property.

    KD Construction unit I Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28702 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 23(5)

  5. ITAT Pune · 28 May 2021
    An income may be appropriately charged to tax on the regularisation of the operations of the bank coupled with the possibility of receipt of income in foreseeable future.

    TS-396-ITAT-2021PUN-Nutan_Warehousing_Co

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28626 (ITAT-PUNE)

  6. ITAT Pune · 27 May 2021
    Income from capital gain on a transaction which never materialized was, at best, hypothetical income.

    Amit Murlidhar Kamthe Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28625 (ITAT-PUNE)

  7. ITAT Pune · 11 Mar 2022
    Although the apparent must be considered as real, but, if there are reasons to believe that the apparent is not real, as is the case under consideration as well, then the apparent should be ignored to unearth the harsh reality.

    M/S. KASTURI RASHI DEVELOPERS VERSUS ITO, WARD-5 (3) , PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28558 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95991&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  8. ITAT Pune · 10 Mar 2022
    Ld. CIT(A) was not justified in upholding the addition.

    THE JANALAXMI CO-OP. BANK LTD. VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE – 1, NASHIK

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28549 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95974&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  9. ITAT Pune · 10 Mar 2022
    Assessee is entitled to exemption. The impugned order is, therefore, set-aside.

    OSWAL BANDHU SAMAJ VERSUS ITO (EXEMPTIONS) -1, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28548 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95976&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  10. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    Income under capital gains is taxable in the year of transfer and further that transfer takes place only when it becomes operational, that is, on executing the sale deed.

    Beena Shammi Chaudhari Vs ITO

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28401 (ITAT-PUNE)

  11. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    If the amount of employees' contribution towards EPF, ESI, etc is delayed by an employer beyond the due date under the respective Acts, the disallowance will be called for notwithstanding the fact that it was deposited before the due date u/s. 139 of the Act.

    POWERLINK ENGINEERS LLP VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-2 NASHIK

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28397 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95648&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  12. ITAT Pune · 18 Feb 2022
    A piece of legislation which imposes a new obligation or attaches a new disability is considered prospective unless the legislative intent is clearly to give it a retrospective effect.

    GRI RENEWABLE INDUSTRIES S.L., (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GONVARRI EOLICA S.L., VERSUS ACIT (IT) , CIRCLE-1, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28395 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95655&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  13. ITAT Pune · 16 Feb 2022
    The appellant has paid interest as interest for delay in payment of TDS. This is not an allowable expenditure. Therefore, disallowance by the CIT(A) is upheld.

    SANKET FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ITO, WARD 1 (3) , JALNA

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28381 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95594&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  14. ITAT Pune · 15 Feb 2022
    It is trite law that a CBDT Circular is binding on the AO and not on the assessees or the ITAT or other appellate authorities and the Circular transgressing the boundaries of section 90(1) cannot bind the ITAT.

    GRI Renewable Industries S.L Vs ACIT (IT)

    (2020) TaxCorp(LJ) 28377 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 90(1)

  15. ITAT Pune · 15 Feb 2022
    Failure of the assessee to deduct tax at source from payment made to the Netherlands entity clearly magnetizes section 40(a)(i) of the Act.

    VANDERLANDE INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ACIT, CIRCLE-13, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28370 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95581&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  16. ITAT Pune · 11 Feb 2022
    We are fully satisfied that the assessee discharged the onus upon him to prove the source of deposit in the joint bank account.

    RAJENDRA SATGOUDA PATIL VERSUS ITO, 2 (3) SANGLI

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28349 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95546&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  17. ITAT Pune · 08 Feb 2022
    Since the assessee did not put to use the two projects under consideration, the interest thereon was required to be capitalized, which was not eligible for deduction u/s. 36(1)(iii).

    ACIT, CIRCLE-6 PUNE VERSUS SILVER JUBILEE MOTORS LTD.

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28331 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95478&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  18. ITAT Pune · 03 Feb 2022
    Assessee is entitled to the depreciation under the provisions of section 32 of the Act inspite of the fact that the vehicle is registered in the name of the director of the appellant company.

    SEHGAL AUTORIDERS PVT. LTD. VERSUS DCIT, CIRCLE-10 PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28306 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95355&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  19. ITAT Pune · 02 Feb 2022
    Provision of section 2(22)(e) of the Act have no application to the facts of the case, there is no necessity to deal with the other contentions raised on behalf of the assessee.

    SHRI JITENDRA KAPILDEO GUPTA, M/S. SUBU CHEM PVT. LTD. VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 6, PUNE

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28293 (ITAT-PUNE) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=95329&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip

  20. ITAT Pune · 04 Jun 2021
    Mere doubt cannot lead to revision of assessment order unless shown that AO failed to apply his mind, or that his view was wrong in facts or law.

    Shivratan Shrigopal Mundada Vs ACIT

    (2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28273 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 54F

Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.


An unhandled error has occurred. Reload ×

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.