-
ITAT - Where the amount of sub-contract payments made by the assessee though without tax deduction at source, has been included by the recipient in his return of income and the said recipient had paid taxes on the income relatable to such receipts, then there is no merit in holding the assessee to be in default for not deducting tax at source.
Mr. Sushil Govindrao Uttarwar Versus The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10322 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=49529&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Sec. 40(a)(ia) not attracted where there is short deduction of tax.
M/s Satyam Petrochemicals Versus The Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10321 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=49530&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Share application money being distinct from share-capital, interest thereon would be ‘revenue’ in nature.
S.R. Thorat Milk Products Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10298 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
ITAT - Compounding fees paid to RBI for regularising ECB is not covered by Explanation to Sec. 37(1) & is deductible.
EON Hadapsar Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10252 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
ITAT - Rental income received by a multiplex upon leasing out portion of building qualifies for deduction u/s 80IB(7A).
Sameer Rajendra Shah Vs. The Jt. Commissioner of Income Tax
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10224 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section. 80IB(7A)
-
ITAT - Foreign exchange fluctuation loss on outstanding foreign currency loan allowable u/s 37(1) as such loss has direct nexus to saving in interest-costs.
Cooper Corporation Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10215 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
ITAT - If the undertaking is carrying out integrated activities by employing hired labourers or by taking warehousing facilities on rent and hiring transportation facilities, the undertaking is eligible to claim deduction u/s. 80IB(11A)
Anurag Radhesham Attal vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10159 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section. 80IB(11A)
-
ITAT - No TDS u/s 195 on commission payment to foreign agent for obtaining purchase order from Indian subsidiary of a foreign company.
Accurate Engineering Co. Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10155 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
ITAT - There is no condition in Art. 24 of India-Singapore DTAA that the money ought to be remitted to or received in other Contracting State 'in the relevant fiscal year', as long as the income was received though in subsequent year.
Imerys Asia Pacific Pvt. Ltd. vs. DDIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10150 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
S. 14A/ Rule 8D: No disallowance can be made on shares held as stock-in-trade
Paresh Pritamlal Mehta vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10104 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 14A
-
ITAT - Deduction claim u/s 80(IB)(10) rejected based on strict interpretation to the term “one acre”.
Virag Deshpanday Developers Vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 10006 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section. 80(IB)(10)
-
ITAT - In view of instructions of CBDT Circular No. 21/2015, dated 10-12-2015, revenue's appeal denied as tax effect was below monetary limit.
Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Sangli v. Pallavi Satish Patil
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9950 (ITAT-PUNE) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=46357&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
WIP Valuation on receipt basis forbidden in mercantile accounting
The ACIT. vs. M/s. Ambarwadikar & Co., Engineers & Contractors
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9907 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
S. 263 Valid if AO fails to enquire business exigency of donations
Shri M.D. Wadhokar vs. CIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9884 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section. 263
-
S. 80IB(10) Mere Common Commercial & Residential Layout?
M/s. D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd. vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9883 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section. 80IB(10)
-
Invocation of Section 263 on mere DCIT Suggestion invalid
Span Overseas Ltd. vs. CIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 9881 (ITAT-PUNE) · Section 263
-
ITAT - Even if the expenditure is of enduring benefit, but having not been incurred in the capital field, is to be allowed as deduction.
DCIT vs. Autoline Industries Ltd.
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9609 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
ITAT - Where the directors had given services and in recognition thereof, there was proposal to pay commission to the said directors, then the same could not be questioned merely on the basis of speculation by the Revenue that the same was to avoid payment of dividend tax.
Arihantam Infraprojects Pvt Ltd vs JCIT
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9579 (ITAT-PUNE)
-
S. 43B/ 145A: Taxes collected by the assessee, which remain unpaid, have to be added to the income even if the same are not debited to the P&L A/c and claimed as a deduction
Munaf Ibrahim Memon vs. ITO
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9550 (ITAT-PUNE) · Sections 43B, 145A
-
ITAT - Consideration received by an individual for relinquishing his rights over trademark jointly owned with assignee by way of family arrangement is a non-taxable capital receipt.
D.S. Thakur vs. ITO
(2015) TaxCorp(LJ) 9433 (ITAT-PUNE)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.