-
ITAT - Since creditor companies are legal entities and are already assessed to income tax and assessee also explained the source of the creditors, no additions u/s 68.
M/s. Jaico Textiles Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer 9 (2) (1), Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11449 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51931&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
S. 153C: An order u/s 153C passed without obtaining the approval of the JCIT u/s 153D is without jurisdiction and void in view of Calcutta Knitwears 362 ITR 673 (SC) and CBDT Circular No. 24/15 dated 31.12.2015
HiKlass Moving Picture Pvt. Ltd vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11440 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 153C, 153D
-
S. 45/48: In valuing the shares of a privately held co, the “enterprise valuation” has to be taken by valuing even the assets held by subsidiaries of the Company. It is common for the sellers to charge a “controlling premium” for the sale of the shares. Such transfers to enable restructuring and re-aligning the shareholding pattern are genuine and bona fide. The alleged excess consideration for the sale of the shares cannot be treated as “unexplained income”
Amritlal T. Shah vs. ITO
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11431 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 45, 48
-
ITAT - No disallowance on account of salary paid to expatriate employees who were employed in India for the services rendered in India.
The British Bank of Middle East Versus The JCIT, Spl. Range 27, Mumbai And Vice-Versa
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11428 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51860&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Since assessee had voluntarily filed return before issuance of the notice for initiation of penalty. No penalty u/s 272A (2)(k) for delay in is furnishing return of TDS.
Smt. Rani A. Grover (Prop. Visual Communications) Versus ACIT (TDS) -Range-3, Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11427 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51911&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - TPO cannot value the ALP of the transaction at “Nil” without adhering to the proper procedure of law laid down under the Act and relevant rules. No penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) for T.P. adjustment.
DCIT -10 (1), Mumbai Versus M/s Kodak Graphic Communication (I) Pvt Ltd
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11422 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51903&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Amount received from nominal members as ‘transfer fees’ by a co-operative society does not represent mutual concerns. ‘Transfer fee’ received by the assessee was to be taxed in its hands.
The Vithalnagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd Versus Income Tax Officer-21 (2) Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11411 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51863&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Foreign exchange fluctuation can be linked to specific items and adoption of sales ratio as the basis for allocation of expenses across the board also does not appear to be correct.
M/s. Directi Internet Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus Income Tax Officer, Circle-9 (1) (3), Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11385 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51839&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Without any further enquires in respect of the Bogus purchases, AO cannot make the addition u/s 69C by merely relying on information obtained from the Sales Tax Department.
ACIT – 25 (3) Versus Shri Vishal P. Mehta
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11384 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51841&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Where price charged by the assessee in international transactions have not been computed in accordance with the provisions contained in section 92C, levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) valid.
M/s. Clestra Life Sciences P. Ltd. (Formerly as Brahma Drugs P. Ltd.) Versus ITO, Ward 10 (3) (1), Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11382 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51290&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - No TDS u/s 194H on charges deducted by the bank for use of swiping machines for sales through credit card as the same is not commission.
The Income Tax Officer (TDS) -3 (4) , Mumbai Versus The Mobile Store Ltd.
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11372 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51790&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Disallowance of amount paid as commission to one whole time working Direcotr who had rendered extra service to the company was not avoidance of payment of tax. Expenditure allowed.
M/s. Marks Shipping Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT - 4 (2), Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11371 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51791&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - U/s 14A r.w.r 8D(2)(iii) disallowance has to be computed only on the average value of investment giving rise to exempt income.
Pinebridge Investment Asset Management Company India Pvt. Ltd. vs. ACIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11362 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 14A
-
ITAT - As per rule of evidence there is distinction between set of facts not proved and facts disproved and facts proved. Benefit to be given to the assessee because there is a doubt for the reason that mere non-satisfactory explanation furnished by the assessee cannot amount proof of falsity of explanation furnished. No penalty levied u/s. 271(1)(c).
Motta Construction Pvt. Ltd. Versus ACIT, Central Circle-15 and 16, Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11353 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51745&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Merely treating the business loss as speculation loss does not automatically warrant inference of concealment of income or furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income. No penalty u/s 271(1)(c).
M/s. Lenient Finvest Pvt. Ltd. (Formerly known as M/s. Leesha Investment Finvest Ltd.) Versus The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (2) 2, Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11349 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51753&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - In case of conscious concealment of facts by the assessee (non disclosure of bank accounts in which cash was deposited), penalty u/s 271(1)(c) justified. N
Mr. Kumar V. Vasani Versus Income Tax Officer-32 (2) (2) , C-13, Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11348 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51754&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
S. 158BE(1)(b): A panchnama for purposes of opening a locker and vacating s. 132(3) prohibitory orders does not amount to conclusion of the search for purposes of extending limitation for passing the block assessment order
Rajendra Agarwal vs. DCIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11335 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 158BE(1)(b)
-
ITAT - Compensation received for cancellation of development agreement is contractual receipt and not short term capital gain.
Income Tax Officer-32 (1) (5) , Mumbai Versus M/s Empire Developers
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11331 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51729&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Where exhaustive exercise has been done by the AO, then order could not be held to be erroneous.
M/s Cartier Leaflin Pvt Ltd Versus ITO, Wd. 1 (1) (2), Mumbai
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11327 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · http://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=51731&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
ITAT - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) upheld upon furnishing inaccurate particulars to claim capital expenditure towards acquisition of fixed asset as a deduction in addition to depreciation claim on the same.
State Bank of Mauritius Ltd. vs. DDIT
(2016) TaxCorp(LJ) 11325 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section. 271(1)(c)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.