-
When undisputedly levy has been made by the A.O in all appeals under consideration prior to 1st June, 2015 by invoking the provisions contained u/s 234E the same is not sustainable in the eyes of law.
LEKHRAJ CORP. PRIVATE LIMITED VERSUS ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL PROCESSING CELL-TDS, TDS CPC AAYAKAR BHAWAN, GHAZIABAD
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28104 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94850&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
CIT could not legally assume jurisdiction u/s. 263 over an order passed by the AO pursuant to the direction of DRP.
Barclays Bank PLC Vs CIT(IT)
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28094 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 263
-
Merely because the assessee issued the CCD, which is hybrid instrument to arrange corporate funding thru group concerns, it does not mean that it has indulged in generation of unaccounted money.
ARM INFRA & UTILITIES PVT. LTD. VERSUS PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX RANGE-6, MUMBAI
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28091 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94826&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Disallowance of certain expenses made on account of specific expenditure claimed in respect of eligible unit would only go to enhance the claim of deduction u/s.80IA of the Act.
WNS GLOBAL SERVICES PVT. LTD. VERSUS ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 10 (2) MUMBAI
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28090 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94830&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
A tax withholding liability, particularly under section 195, is a vicarious liability and its survival entirely depends on survival of the primary tax liability of income, embedded in the related payments, in the hands of the recipient.
Braitrim India Pvt. Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer (IT)
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28086 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 195
-
AO has no jurisdiction to make addition in an unabated assessment year without there being incriminating materials and accordingly the jurisdiction of the AO can not be justified.
DCIT, CC-7 (1) , MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. DR. D.Y. PATIL SPORTS ACADEMY, MUMBAI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28076 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94801&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Assessing officer has not found any incriminating material during search, he cannot make any addition in the proceedings under section 153A of the Act, therefore, penalty cannot be levied in this case.
MR. VIKRAM BODHRAJ TANNA, M/S CAPSULATION SERVICES LTD. VERSUS ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-20, MUMBAI, DCIT CC 3 (2) , CENTRAL RANGE-3, MUMBAI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28075 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94802&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
No penalty u/s 271D and 271E of the Act could be invoked in the present case.
DCIT (CC) 7 (3) , MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. MACROTECH DEVELOPERS LTD., (SUCCESSOR TO M/S. BELLISSIMO CROWN BUILDMART PVT. LTD.
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28074 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94803&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The additions made on mere presumptions could not be sustained and there must be something more than mere suspicion to support the assessment.
SHRI VASANTLAL NYALCHAND KIKAVAT (THROUGH L/H SHRI PANKAJ V. KIKAVAT) VERSUS DCIT-CC 3 (4) , MUMBAI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28072 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94818&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
The CIT(A), without considering assessee’s submissions, erred in making enhancement in the hands of the assessee.
Arysta LifeScience India Limited Vs ACIT
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28064 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Advances lost during the course of business would be business losses and hence, an allowable deduction.
Maneesh Pharmaceuticals Ltd Vs DCIT- CC-7 (1)
(2022) TaxCorp(LJ) 28063 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The liability on account of debenture redemption premium is liable to be deducted from the income and cannot be treated as contingent liability.
63 Moon Technologies Limited Vs DCIT
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28060 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
No disallowance out of the cost incurred towards free samples is called for.
Procter & Gamble Health Limited Vs The Asstt.Commissioner of Incometax-7(1)(1)
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28059 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
Even if deduction u/s 80G has been claimed, then also revenue cannot disallow the deduction taken by the assessee for incurring CSR expenditure.
Naik Seafoods Pvt. Ltd Vs Pr. CIT – 2
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28056 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Sections 37, 80G
-
Provision of section 69C cannot be attracted in this case, unless revenue brings on record any proof of expenditure incurred.
M/S TYLAN ORGANICS PVT LTD C/O KALYANIWALLA AND MISTRY LLP VERSUS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE 1 (3) (1) , MUMBAI
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28045 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94779&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Compensation to slum dwellers under consensus-based Court order will be an allowable expenditure and not a contingent liability.
Salient Traders Pvt. Ltd Vs The Income Tax Officer
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28034 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
-
The bonus paid to the employees and the key management personnel was in the ordinary course of business and squarely allowable as deduction u/s 37 of the Act.
IDFC Capital Ltd Vs DCIT-14(2)(1)
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28033 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 37(1)
-
Assessee had proper reasonable cause within the meaning of section 273B of the Act.
DCIT. CENT. CIR-7 (3), MUMBAI VERSUS M/S. SANATHNAGAR ENTERPRISES LTD., M/S. AJITNATH HI-TECH BUILDERS PVT. LTD., M/S. LODHA GLOWING CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., M/S. LODHA PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENTS PVT. LTD.
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28032 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · https://taxcorp.in/FileOpenDT.aspx?ID=94706&Category=ITAT&CategoryType=Zip
-
Bank of India's excess contribution to superannuation fund is an admissible operative expenditure u/s 37(1).
Bank of India Vs The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28016 (ITAT-MUMBAI) · Section 37(1)
-
The business constraints and exigencies and administrative convenience itself constitutes reasonable cause within the meaning of Section 273B, and thus no penalty u/s 271D and 271E could be invoked.
Macrotech Developers Limited Vs DCIT(CC)7(3)
(2021) TaxCorp(LJ) 28011 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
Headnote lines are open to everyone. The full headnote and the judgment text open with a subscription — see plans or sign in.